Literature DB >> 31667229

Experimental datasets on processed eggshell membrane powder for wound healing.

Tamer A E Ahmed1,2, Henri-Pierre Suso3, Maxwell T Hincke2,4.   

Abstract

Eggshell (ES) and eggshell membrane (ESM) is a significant byproduct of the egg producing industry (Ahmed et al., 2019). Many studies have been undertaken to utilize ES waste for potential value added applications (Cordeiro and Hincke, 2011). Described here are the datasets from our evaluation of processed eggshell membrane powder (PEP) as a wound healing product using the mouse excisional wound splinting model (Ahmed et al., 2019). PEP biomaterial was characterized by proteomics using various extraction and solubilization strategies including moderate (lithium dodecyl sulphate (LDS) and urea/ammonium bicarbonate) and harsh conditions (3-mercaptopropionic acid (3-MPA) and NaOH/dimethylsulfoxide) in order to progressively overcome its stable, insoluble nature (Ahmed et al., 2019, Ahmed et al., 2017). Analysis of proteomic data allowed the relative abundance of the main PEP protein constituents to be determined. The efficacy of PEP for promotion of wound healing was assessed using the mouse excisional wound splinting model, and well-established semi-quantitative histological scoring. (More details about the PEP biomaterial characterization and its in vivo evaluation can be found in the related research article (Ahmed et al., 2019)).
© 2019 The Authors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Histological scoring; Processed eggshell membrane powder; Proteomics; Wound healing

Year:  2019        PMID: 31667229      PMCID: PMC6811977          DOI: 10.1016/j.dib.2019.104457

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Data Brief        ISSN: 2352-3409


Specifications Table The presented data describes the utilization of various extraction and solubilization strategies [1], [4] to identify the protein constituents of PEP by proteomics. The proteomic approach allows the estimation of relative abundances of the main protein constituents of PEP biomaterial. The data demonstrates the use of animals (C57BL/6J mice) for the planimetric timecourse and histological assessment of healing of the splinted excisional wound after application of a biomaterial (PEP). The data describes an established histological scoring system used to assess the effect of PEP on various histological parameters critical to assess wound healing promotion. The histological processing of PEP biomaterial via pelleting and pre-embedding in agar-formalin media provides researchers with a strategy to process powdered biomaterials and even cells.

Data

The presented data demonstrates the utilization of various extraction strategies (moderate to harsh conditions) [1], [2], [3], [4] to identify the protein constituents of PEP using the proteomic approach (Table 1). A comprehensive PEP proteome was established and compared to the general ESM proteome (Fig. 1 and Table 2). LC/MS/MS spectrometry data was interpreted in order to determine the relative abundance of the main protein constituents of PEP biomaterial (Table 3). The kinetics of wound healing (with and without PEP) in the mouse splinting excisional wound model was determined using a macroscopic planimetric strategy with histological scoring (Table 4). The histological scoring system was established to assess various histological parameters including degree of angiogenesis, collagen deposition, fibroblast infiltration, macrophage infiltration, polymorphonuclear cells (PMN) infiltration, fibrin clot formation, epidermal differentiation and indentation along with the presence of multinucleated giant cells (Table 5). Finally, PEP was stained with Masson's trichrome to confirm the absence of stainable collagen using an innovative pre-embedding histological approach (Fig. 2).
Table 1

Various extraction conditions used for the in-solution and in-gel digestion-based proteomic analysis of PEP.

Extraction strategy
In-solution digestionaIn-gel digestion
AbBbCa
Digestion buffer (urea 8 M/ammonium bicarbonate 100 mM), sonication (2 × 15s on – 1min off on ice), centrifugation (16,000×g, 10min, 4 °C)3-mercaptopropionic acid (1.25 M), 1.7 M acetic acid, 24 hours, 80 °C, shaking water bath.NaOH (5% w/v), DMSO, 4 hours, 50 °C, hot plate stirrer.LDS (73mM)/DTT (50 mM), NuPAGE sample buffer only, 30 minutes, 70 °C, Heat block.

Moderate extraction conditions.

Harsh solubilization conditions.

Fig. 1

Venn chart showing a comparison of the PEP proteome to the recently published ESM proteome (Ahmed et al., 2017) [4]. Twenty four (24) of the PEP proteins were not previously identified in the ESM proteome. Micronization to prepare PEP facilitated the identification of a greater number of proteins by increasing the efficiency of the in-solution digestion approach.

Table 2

Inventory of the PEP proteome, as compared to the ESM (hand-peeled and flakes) proteome.

No.Protein nameGene SymbolGene IDPEPESM
1Actin, γ1ACTG1415296YESYES
2ADAM metallopeptidase with thrombospondin type 1 motif, 5ADAMTS5427971YESNO
3A-kinase anchoring protein 12AKAP12421634NOYES
4AlbuminALB396197YESYES
5Aminopeptidase N, Alanyl (membrane) aminopeptidase.ANPEP395667NOYES
6Angiopoietin like 3ANGPTL3100189558YESNO
7Annexin A2ANXA2396297YESNO
8Antigen identified by monoclonal antibody Ki-67MKI67423963NOYES
9Apolipoprotein A-IAPOA1396536YESYES
10Apolipoprotein BAPOB396535YESYES
11Apolipoprotein DAPOD424893YESYES
12Apolipoprotein H (β-2-glycoprotein I)APOH417431YESYES
13Apovitellenin 1APOV1396476YESYES
14ash1 (absent, small, or homeotic)-likeASH1L425064NOYES
15ATPase H+ transporting accessory protein 2ATP6AP2418573YESNO
16ATP-binding cassette, sub-family A (ABC1), member 4ABCA4424490NOYES
17Avian β-defensin 9AvBD9414343NOYES
18Avian β -defensin 10AvBD10414341NOYES
19Avian β -defensin 11AvBD11414876YESYES
20AvidinAVD396260YESYES
21BPI fold containing family C, member BBPIFCB771461NOYES
22Breast cancer 2BRCA2374139NOYES
23Bromodomain containing 8BRD8416219NOYES
24BTB domain containing 7BTBD7423424NOYES
25Ca++-dependent secretion activator 2CADPS2417756NOYES
26Cadherin 1, type 1, E-cadherin (epithelial)CDH1415860YESYES
27Cadherin, EGF LAG seven-pass G-type receptor 3CELSR3107054381NOYES
28Calcium channel, voltage-dependent, T type, a 1H subunitCACNA1H416526NOYES
29Calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II βCAMK2B374174NOYES
30Calmodulin 2CALM395855NOYES
31Carbohydrate (N-acetylglucosamine 6-O) sulfotransferase 6CHST6770257YESNO
32Carboxypeptidase ECPE422424YESNO
33Cathepsin BCTSB396329YESYES
34Cathepsin E-A-likeCTSEAL417848YESNO
35Cell division cycle 20BCDC20B426169NOYES
36CentriolinCNTRL417121NOYES
37Centrosomal protein 152kDaCEP152415437NOYES
38Chondroitin sulphate proteoglycan 4CSPG4425524NOYES
39Chromosome 1 open reading frame, human C12orf35C1H12ORF35418136NOYES
40ClusterinCLU395722YESYES
41Coagulation factor II (thrombin)F2395306NOYES
42CochlinCOCH395779NOYES
43Collagen III (α1 chain)COL3A1396340NOYES
44Collagen IV (α 1 chain)COL4A1395530NOYES
45Collagen IV (α 3 chain)COL4A3424797NOYES
46Collagen IV (α 6 chain)COL4A6422350NOYES
47Collagen V (α 2 chain)COL5A2423986NOYES
48Collagen VII (α 1 chain)COL7A1427584NOYES
49Collagen VIII (α 1 chain)COL8A1418378NOYES
50Collagen X (α 1 chain)COL10A1100858979YESYES
51Collagen XI (al chain)COL11A1374046NOYES
52Collagen XII (al chain)COL12A1395875NOYES
53Collagen XXII, (a l chain)COL22A1420315NOYES
54Complement component 3C3396370YESNO
55Contactin 5CNTN5395317NOYES
56Cortactin binding protein 2CTTNBP2417766NOYES
57Corticotropin releasing hormoneCRH404297NOYES
58CREMP (cysteine rich ESM protein)CREMP776923YESYES
59CREMP1N/AN/ANOYES
60CREMP2N/AN/ANOYES
61CREMP3N/AN/AYESYES
62CREMP4N/AN/ANOYES
63CREMP5N/AN/AYESYES
64CREMP6N/AN/ANOYES
65CTS telomere maintenance complex component 1CTC1418324NOYES
66CUB and Sushi multiple domains 2CSMD2419640NOYES
67Cystatin CCST3396497YESYES
68Dedicator of cytokinesis 1DOCK1423960NOYES
69Deleted in malignant brain tumors 1 protein-like (EW135).DMBT1L426826YESYES
70DENN/MADD domain containing 4CDENND4C427236NOYES
71DesmoplakinDSP420869NOYES
72Dickkopf homolog 3DKK3396023YESYES
73di-N-acetyl- chitobiaseCTBS424535NOYES
74DnaJ heat shock protein family (Hsp40) member C7DNAJC7428312NOYES
75Dynein, axonemal, heavy chain 1DNAH1415943NOYES
76Dynein, axonemal, heavy chain 12DNAH12416004NOYES
77Dynein, axonemal, heavy chain 9DNAH9417314NOYES
78Dynein, cytoplasmic 2, heavy chain 1DYNC2H1418979NOYES
79DystrophinDMD396236NOYES
80EGF containing fibulin-like extracellular matrix protein 1EFEMP1428543NOYES
81EGF-like repeats and discoidin I-like domains 3EDIL3427326YESYES
82Enolase 2 (γ, neuronal)ENO2395689NOYES
83Enolase 3ENO3396016NOYES
84EPH receptor B3EPHB3396179NOYES
85Eukaryotic translation elongation factor l alEEF1A1373963NOYES
86Family with sequence similarity 20, member CFAM20C416445YESNO
87Family with sequence similarity 21, member AFAM21A423772NOYES
88F-box and WD repeat domain containing 8FBXW8417024NOYES
89Fibrinogen γ chainFGG395837YESNO
90Fibronectin 1FN1396133YESYES
91flightless I homologFLII416515NOYES
92Folate receptor 1 (adult)FOLR1395638NOYES
93G protein-coupled receptor kinase interactor 1GIT1417584NOYES
94G protein-coupled receptor kinase interactor 2GIT2374035NOYES
95GalactosylceramidaseGLAC423394YESYES
96Gastrokine 2GKN2419515YESYES
97Glutamine and serine rich 1QSER1421599NOYES
98Glutathione peroxidase 3GPX3427638YESYES
99Glutathione S-transferase α 3GSTA3414896NOYES
100Golgi glycoprotein 1GLG1396492YESNO
101Group-specific component (vitamin D binding protein)GC395696NOYES
102Heat shock 70kDa protein 5 (glucose-regulated protein, 78kDa)HSPA5396487YESNO
103Heat shock 70kDa protein 8HSPA8395853NOYES
104Hemoglobin, α 1HBAA416652YESNO
105Hemoglobin, γ GHBG2396485YESYES
106HemopexinHPX419076YESYES
107HEP21 proteinHEP21395192YESYES
108Heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein A2/B1HNRNPA2B1420627NOYES
109Heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein A3 homolog 1 -likeHNRNPA3100859627NOYES
110Heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein D-likeHNRNPDL422601NOYES
111Hexosaminidase B (β polypeptide)HEXB427204YESNO
112Histone H1.11LHIST1H111L427892NOYES
113Histone H1.11RHIST1H111R427896NOYES
114Histone H2AHIST1H2A4404299NOYES
115Histone H2BHIST1H2B8427886YESYES
116Histone H3 family 3CH3F3C427887NOYES
117Histone H4HIST1H47417950YESYES
118Histone H5H1F0693250NOYES
119Hyaluronan and proteoglycan link protein 3HAPLN3415495YESYES
120Ig heavy chainN/AN/ANOYES
121Ig heavy chain variable regionN/AN/ANOYES
122Ig J polypeptide, linker protein for Ig a and α polypeptidesIGJ374117NOYES
123Ig light chain variable regionN/AN/ANOYES
124Ig mu chain C regionN/AN/AYESYES
125Ig α heavy chainN/AN/AYESYES
126Ig γchainN/AN/AYESYES
127Ig λlight chainN/AN/ANOYES
128Ig λ-like polypeptide 1IGLL1416928YESYES
129Immunoglobulin like domain containing receptor 1ILDR1418358NOYES
130Junction plakoglobinJUP429710NOYES
131Kinesin family member 21BKIF21B421178NOYES
132Kinesin family member 26AKIF26A423489NOYES
133La ribonucleoprotein domain family, member 4BLARP4B420457NOYES
134LDL receptor-related protein 11LRP11421629NOYES
135Lectin, mannose-binding 2LMAN2100859676NOYES
136Leucine zipper protein 1LUZP1428210NOYES
137Lipocalin 8, extracellular fatty acid-binding proteinLCN396393YESYES
138Lymphocyte antigen 86LY86420872YESYES
139Lysozyme CLYZ396218YESYES
140Lysyl oxidase-like 2LOXL2419533YESYES
141Mediator complex subunit 15MED15416941NOYES
142Melanoma inhibitory activity family, member 3MIA3421337NOYES
143Milk fat globule-EGF factor 8 protein (lactadherin isoform 2)MFGE8415494YESYES
144Mucin 6 oligomeric mucus/gel-forming (ovomucin, β subunint)MUC6414878YESYES
145Mucin-5AC-likeLOC100859916100859916YESYES
146Myeloid/lymphoid or mixed-lineage leukemia 2MLL2425846NOYES
147Myeloid/lymphoid or mixed-lineage leukemia 3MLL3420437NOYES
148Myosin, heavy chain 10, non-muscleMYH10396465NOYES
149Myosin, heavy chain 9, non-muscleMYH9396469NOYES
150N-acetylglucosamine-1-phosphate transferase, a and β subunitsGNPTAB418096NOYES
151Neuron navigator 2NAV2422977NOYES
152Neuron navigator 3NAV3417869NOYES
153Neuropeptide YNPY396464NOYES
154NeurotriminNTM395450NOYES
155Nucleobindin 2NUCB2423071YESYES
156Obscurin, cytoskeletal calmodulin and titin-interacting RhoGEFOBSCN420395NOYES
157Olfactomedin 4, tiarin-likeOLFM4418826YESYES
158OvalbuminSERBIN14396058YESYES
159Ovalbumin-related protein XSERPINB14C420898YESYES
160Ovalbumin-related protein YSERPINB14B420897YESYES
161Ovocalyxin 32 (Retinoic acid receptor responder 1)RARRES1395209YESYES
162Ovocalyxin 36 (BPI fold containing family B, member 3)BPIFB3419289YESYES
163Ovocleidin 116 (matrix extracellular phosphoglycoprotein)MEPE395256YESYES
164Ovocleidin 17OC-17100313508YESYES
165Ovoglobulin G2 (TENP)BPIFB7395882YESYES
166Ovodefensin A1OvoDA1422030YESYES
167Ovomucin, α subunitMUC5B395381YESYES
168OvostatinOVST396151YESYES
169Ovostatin-likeOVSTL425757NOYES
170Ovotransferrin (transferrin)TF396241YESYES
171p21 protein (Cdc42/Rac)-activated kinase 3PAK3422342NOYES
172Phosphoglucomutase 5PGM5427215NOYES
173Phospholipase B domain containing 1PLBD1417967YESNO
174Piccolo (presynaptic cytomatrix protein)PCLO395319NOYES
175PIT54 proteinPIT54395364YESYES
176PleiotrophinPTN418125YESNO
177Polycystic kidney and hepatic disease 1 (autosomal recessive)PKHD1422044NOYES
178Polymeric immunoglobulin receptorPIGR419848NOYES
179Procollagen-lysine, 2-oxoglutarate 5-dioxygenase 1PLOD1419485YESYES
180Programmed cell death 6PDCD6420988NOYES
181Prolyl 4-hydroxylase, β polypeptideP4HB374091YESNO
182Prospero homeobox 1PROX1395802NOYES
183Prostaglandin D2 synthase 21kDaPTGDS374110YESYES
184Prostate stem cell antigenPSCA420302YESYES
185Prostatic acid phosphatase-likeLOC428451428451YESYES
186Protein O-fucosyltransferase 2POFUT2395112YESNO
187Protein phosphatase, Mg2+/Mn2+ dependent, 1JPPM1J419873NOYES
188Protein tyrosine phosphatase, receptor type, APTPRA396060NOYES
189Protocadherin 1PCDH1416194NOYES
190Quiescin Q6 sulfhydryl oxidase 1QSOX1373914YESYES
191Retbindin (Riboflavin-binding protein)RTBDN396449YESYES
192Retinoic acid receptor responder 2RARRES2420366YESYES
193Rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor (GEF) 17ARHGEF17777518NOYES
194Ribosomal protein L36RPL36373936NOYES
195Ring finger protein 17RNF17418961NOYES
196Rootletin, ciliary rootlet coiled-coilCROCC428191NOYES
197RPE-spondin-likeLOC771089771089NOYES
198Salivary amylase, αlAAMY1A414139NOYES
199Sal-like 4SALL4769286NOYES
200Secretoglobin family 1C member 1 -likeLOC101749303101749303NOYES
201Secretory trypsin inhibitorSPINK1101749216NOYES
202Sema domain, immunoglobulin domain (Ig), short basic domain, secreted, (semaphorin) 3GSEMA3G415945YESYES
203Serine peptidase inhibitor, Kazal type 2 (acrosin-trypsin inhibitor)SPINK2770729YESYES
204Serine peptidase inhibitor, Kazal type 5, (Ovoinhibitor)SPINK5416235YESYES
205Serine peptidase inhibitor, Kazal type 7 (ovomucoid)SPINK7416236YESYES
206Serine/threonine kinase 38STK38428260NOYES
207Serpin peptidase inhibitor, clade B (ovalbumin), member 1SERPINB1420894NOYES
208Serpin peptidase inhibitor, clade B (ovalbumin), member 5SERPINB5420900NOYES
209Serpin peptidase inhibitor, clade E (nexin, plasminogen activator inhibitor type 1), member 2SERPINE2424805YESYES
210Serpin peptidase inhibitor, clade F (α-2 antiplasmin, pigment epithelium derived factor), member 2SERPINF2100857105YESYES
211Shroom family member 3SHROOM3422636NOYES
212Similar to arf-GAP with Rho-GAP domain of ZebrafishN/AN/ANOYES
213Similar to CREB binding protein b of ZebrafishN/AN/ANOYES
214Similar to cadherin 4 of ZebrafishCDH4N/ANOYES
215Similar to Calumenin A of ZebrafishN/AN/AYESYES
216Similar to IgGFc-binding protein-like of wild turkey.ZANN/ANOYES
217Similar to Kunitz-like protease inhibitorLOC771972771972YESYES
218Similar to metastasis associated 1 of ZebrafishMTA1N/ANOYES
219Similar to Septin 4a of ZebrafishN/AN/ANOYES
220Similar to transcription factor EB ZebrafishTFEBN/ANOYES
221Similar to zinc finger ZZ-type and EF-hand domain-containing protein 1 of wild turkeyZZEF1100541118NOYES
222Spectrin repeat containing, nuclear envelope 1SYNE1421640YESYES
223Spectrin, β, non-erythrocytic 5SPTBN5423225NOYES
224Sperm associated antigen 16SPAG16424009NOYES
225Stromal cell derived factorSDF4419423YESYES
226Syndecan binding protein (syntenin)SDCBP421136YESNO
227TATA box binding protein likeTBPL2776269NOYES
228Tenascin CTNC396440YESYES
229Teneurin transmembrane protein 3TENM3422557NOYES
230Tetratricopeptide repeat domain 3TTC3418518NOYES
231Thyroid hormone receptor interactor 11TRIP11423414NOYES
232TIMP metallopeptidase inhibitor 3TIMP3396483YESYES
233TitinTTN424126NOYES
234transcobalamin 2TCN2429737YESNO
235Transient receptor potential cation channel, subfamily M, member 1TRPM1427494NOYES
236Transient receptor potential cation channel, subfamily V, member 2TRPV2417603NOYES
237Transthyretin.TTR396277YESYES
238Tsukushi, small leucine rich proteoglycanTSKU419088YESYES
239Tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily, member 6b, decoyTNFRSF6B395096YESYES
240Tumor necrosis factor superfamily member 10TNFSF10378894YESNO
241Ubiquitin BUBB396190NOYES
242Ubiquitin specific peptidase 4 (proto-oncogene)USP4415937NOYES
243Ubiquitin-protein ligase E3BUBE3B776286NOYES
244Uncharacterized LOC107049386LOC107049386107049386NOYES
245Uncharacterized LOC771994LOC771994771994YESNO
246Uncharacterized protein (R4GJG8)N/AN/ANOYES
247Uncharacterized protein (UPI0000448E55)N/AN/AYESNO
248Uncharacterized protein (UPI0000E802A1)N/AN/AYESNO
249Uncharacterized protein (UPI000240B987)N/AN/ANOYES
250Uncharacterized proteins (R4GIK1)N/AN/ANOYES
251Uridine-cytidine kinase 1 -like 1UCKL1419255NOYES
252Vacuolar protein sorting 13 homolog DVPS13D419481NOYES
253Vitelline membrane outer layer protein 1VMO1418974YESYES
254Vitellogenin 1VTG1424547YESYES
255Vitellogenin 2VTG2424533YESYES
256VitronectinVTN395935YESYES
257v-raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog BBRAF396239NOYES
258WAP four-disulfide core domain 8WFDC8419301YESYES
259WSC domain containing 2WSCD2416887NOYES
260YLP motif containing 1; (C14orf170)YLPM1423356NOYES
261Zinc finger protein 185-likeLOC422301422301NOYES
262Zinc finger protein 335ZNF335396131NOYES
263Zinc finger, CCHC domain containing 11ZCCHC11424642NOYES
264Zona pellucida glycoprotein 1 (sperm receptor)ZP1395418NOYES
265Zona pellucida sperm-binding protein 3ZP3378906NOYES
266A thalassemia/mental retardation syndrome X-linkedATRX422331NOYES
267α1 acid glycoproteinORM1395220YESYES
268α2 macroglobulin-like 1A2ML1418254YESYES
269α2 macroglobulin-like 4A2ML4100858010NOYES
270β 1,4-N-acetyl-galactosaminyl transferase 4B4GALNT4770601NOYES
271β microseminoprotein-likeLOC101750704101750704YESYES
272β2 microglobulinB2M414830NOYES
Total110248
Table 3

Relative abundance of the main proteins constituting the PEP biomaterial. Data is arranged according to the percent abundance.

Gene symbolAverage total spectral count% abundance
LOXL233.328.0
CREMPs31.227.0
LYZ13.812.0
COL10A111.510.0
SERBIN147.36.0
MEPE4.03.0
TF3.03.0
CLU2.02.0
HAPLN32.02.0
OC-172.52.0
GKN21.00.8
NUCB21.00.8
ORM11.00.8
QSOX11.00.8
SERPINB14B1.00.8
SERPINB14C1.00.8
VTG21.00.8
Table 4

Number of mice used for the in vivo study.

Purpose of the studyNumber of C57BL/6J mice evaluated
Day 0Day 3Day 7Day 10Day 14Day 17
Wound closure curve383834343030
Histology040404
Total383834343030
Table 5

Scoring scheme for the different histological parameters to assess wound healing.

Histological parameterScore
012345
AngiogenesisAbsentScantyLowModerateMarkedProfound
Collagen depositionAbsentScanty/disorganizedlow/fragmentedModerate/separatedProfound/organizedRestored
Fibroblast infiltrationAbsentScantyLowModerateMarkedProfound
Macrophage infiltrationAbsentScantyLowModerateMarkedProfound
PMN infiltrationAbsentScantyLowModerateMarkedProfound
Fibrin clotAbsentScantyLowModerateMarkedProfound
Epidermal differentiation and indentationAbsentScantyLowModerateMarkedProfound
Multinuclear giant cellsAbsentScantyLowModerateMarkedProfound
Fig. 2

Masson's trichrome staining showing the amorphous nature of PEP biomaterial and the absence of stainable collagen fibres.

Various extraction conditions used for the in-solution and in-gel digestion-based proteomic analysis of PEP. Moderate extraction conditions. Harsh solubilization conditions. Venn chart showing a comparison of the PEP proteome to the recently published ESM proteome (Ahmed et al., 2017) [4]. Twenty four (24) of the PEP proteins were not previously identified in the ESM proteome. Micronization to prepare PEP facilitated the identification of a greater number of proteins by increasing the efficiency of the in-solution digestion approach. Inventory of the PEP proteome, as compared to the ESM (hand-peeled and flakes) proteome. Relative abundance of the main proteins constituting the PEP biomaterial. Data is arranged according to the percent abundance. Number of mice used for the in vivo study. Scoring scheme for the different histological parameters to assess wound healing. Masson's trichrome staining showing the amorphous nature of PEP biomaterial and the absence of stainable collagen fibres.

Experimental design, materials, and methods

Proteomic analysis

Processed eggshell membrane powder (PEP, <100 μm) [3] was subjected to various extraction and solubilization strategies as utilized previously for ESM proteomics [4](Table 1). A complete protein inventory for PEP was created by merging the proteins identified after application of moderate extraction [lithium dodecyl sulphate/dithiothreitol (LDS/DTT) or urea/ammonium bicarbonate (NH4HCO3)] and harsh solubilization conditions [3-mercaptopropionic acid (3-MPA) or sodium hydroxide/dimethylsulfoxide (NaOH/DMSO)] (Fig. 1 and Table 2). Conditions of in-gel (3-MPA, NaOH/DMSO, and LDS/DTT) or in-solution [urea/NH4HCO3] tryptic digestion were applied and the resultant peptides were analyzed using the 5600 mass spectrometer with a nanoelectrospray ion source connected to Agilent 1200 nanopump (ES-MS/MS) [3], [4].

Relative abundance of PEP protein constituents

MS/MS peak lists were generated using ProteinPilot (Version 4.5) and analyzed using Mascot (Version 2.4.0) and X!Tandem (CYCLONE version), both programmed to search the TAX_GallusGallus_9031_20141114 database (unknown version, 222,250 entries). Validation of MS/MS based peptide and protein identification was performed using Scaffold Proteome software (version 4.3.4). MS/MS spectra were searched against the Uniprot and NCBI chicken databases. The relative abundance of the PEP protein constituents was estimated by averaging the total spectral count of each identified protein using the aforementioned Scaffold Proteome software (Table 3).

In vivo study

All in vivo experiments were conducted following the approved animal protocol (CMM 2108) by the University of Ottawa Animal Care committee and according to the guidelines of the Canadian Council on Animal Care (CCAC). All animal protocols are in compliance with the NIH Guide for Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (Animal Welfare Assurance # A5043-01). Capacity of PEP for promotion of wound healing was assessed using the well-established mouse excisional wound splinting model [5]and the subsequent macroscopic planimetric timecourse [6] and histological scoring. A total of 38C57BL/6J male mice (10–12 weeks old, Jackson Laboratories, USA) were used for the entire study (Table 4).

Histological assessments

PEP (50 mg) was suspended in 1 mL PBS and centrifuged for 5 minutes at 13,000 rpm. The resultant pellet was centered in a base mould; pre-mounting media composed of 2% agar and 10% formalin was poured gently over the pellet and left for few minutes to solidify. The resulted PEP block was processed using the LOGOS tissue processer, embedded in paraffin and then sectioned using a Leica microtome. PEP sections were stained using Masson trichrome to confirm the absence of stainable collagen in the PEP biomaterial (Fig. 2). For evaluation of wound healing, histological scoring system was established to assess parameters that represent wound healing [7], [8], [9], including degree of angiogenesis, collagen deposition, fibroblast infiltration, macrophage infiltration, polymorphonuclear cells (PMN) infiltration, fibrin clot formation, epidermal differentiation and indentation along with presence of multinucleated giant cells. Every parameter was given a score of 0–5 based on its graded level of abundance. Score 0 indicates complete absence, while score 5 indicates profound manifestation of the assessed parameter. Scoring of collagen deposition was based, not only on the degree of abundance (i.e. absent, scanty, low, moderate, profound, restored), but also on the degree of organization (disorganized, fragmented, separated, organized) (Table 5).

Specifications Table

Subject areaMaterials Science
More specific subject areaBiomaterials
Type of dataTables and figures.
How data was acquiredAgilent 1200 nanopump (Reversed-phase (RP) nanoscale capillary liquid chromatography (nanoLC), Agilent Technologies Canada Inc., Ontario, Canada) connected to mass spectrometer 5600 with a nanoelectrospray ion source (ES-MS/MS, AB Sciex, MA, USA).LOGOS microwave hybrid tissue processor (Milestone, MI, USA).Leica microtome (Leica Biosystems Inc., ON, Canada).Zeiss Mirax Midi whole slide digital scanner (Carl Zeiss Canada Ltd, ON, Canada).
Data formatRaw and analyzed
Experimental factorsMass spectrometry: Eggshell membrane collected at the egg breaking unit was processed (washed, milled, sieved, and γ sterilized) into a micronized powder (<100 μm), which was designated “Processed Eggshell Membrane Powder” (PEP). For proteomics, PEP samples were subjected to various extraction and solubilization strategies including moderate (via lithium dodecyl sulphate (LDS) and urea/ammonium bicarbonate (NH4HCO3)) and harsh conditions (via 3-mercaptopropionic acid (3-MPA) and NaOH/dimethylsulfoxide) conditions. Samples prepared by 3-MPA, NaOH/DMSO, and LDS/DTT treatment were subjected to in-gel digestion, while in the case of urea/NH4HCO3extraction, in-solution digestion was performed. The protein constituents of PEP were identified using LC/MS/MS analysis, with a false discovery rate (FDR) of 1% and at least two unique peptides. Keratins were discarded from the identified protein inventory. In addition, any protein identified with only one unique peptide (according to the Scaffold software interface) was discarded from the final protein inventory.Tissue processing: The processed wound samples were cut into two halves (Upper and lower halves) and then embedded in paraffin (Leica Biosystems Inc., ON, Canada). PEP (50 mg) was suspended in PBS and centrifuged. The resultant pellet was centered in pre-embedding media and processed with the LOGOS tissue processor.Digital scanning:Stained tissue and PEP sections were scanned with Zeiss Mirax Midi whole slide digital scanner (12 slides/scan and 40X objective lens). Exposure time was 10-100 ms (bright field) and the specimen threshold level of 40-45.
Experimental featuresA complete protein inventory for PEP was created by merging the proteins identified by LC/MS/MS analysis after various extraction and solubilization strategies. Relative abundances of proteins identified in the PEP biomaterial were determined using Scaffold proteome software. The effect of PEP on wound healing was evaluated in the mouse excisional wound splinting model using the macroscopic planimetric timecourse (30–38 mice) and a histological scoring system (4 mice each at time points 3, 10, and 17). Various histological parameters related to wound healing were scored for all stained section. The absence of stainable collagen in the PEP biomaterial was confirmed using Masson's trichrome staining of the PEP pellet.
Data source locationMS/MS spectrometry was conducted in the Proteomics Platform Of Québec Genomics Center, CHU de Québec Research Center (Laval, QC, Canada).In vivo experiments were carried out in the animal care and veterinary service facility (ACVS), Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.Wound tissue sample processing, embedding, sectioning, staining, and scanning was performed in the Histology Core Facility, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Data accessibilityThe data are available within the article.
Related research articleAhmed TAE, Suso HP, Maqbool A, and Hincke MT. Processed Eggshell Membrane Powder: Bioinspiration for an Innovative Wound Healing Product, Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 95 (2019) 192–203.
Value of the data

The presented data describes the utilization of various extraction and solubilization strategies [1], [4] to identify the protein constituents of PEP by proteomics.

The proteomic approach allows the estimation of relative abundances of the main protein constituents of PEP biomaterial.

The data demonstrates the use of animals (C57BL/6J mice) for the planimetric timecourse and histological assessment of healing of the splinted excisional wound after application of a biomaterial (PEP).

The data describes an established histological scoring system used to assess the effect of PEP on various histological parameters critical to assess wound healing promotion.

The histological processing of PEP biomaterial via pelleting and pre-embedding in agar-formalin media provides researchers with a strategy to process powdered biomaterials and even cells.

  8 in total

Review 1.  Aging and wound healing.

Authors:  Ankush Gosain; Luisa A DiPietro
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2004-02-17       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  In-depth comparative analysis of the chicken eggshell membrane proteome.

Authors:  Tamer A E Ahmed; Henri-Pierre Suso; Maxwell T Hincke
Journal:  J Proteomics       Date:  2017-01-10       Impact factor: 4.044

Review 3.  Epithelial mechanobiology, skin wound healing, and the stem cell niche.

Authors:  Nicholas D Evans; Richard O C Oreffo; Eugene Healy; Philipp J Thurner; Yu Hin Man
Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater       Date:  2013-05-14

4.  Processed eggshell membrane powder: Bioinspiration for an innovative wound healing product.

Authors:  Tamer A E Ahmed; Henri-Pierre Suso; Ayesha Maqbool; Maxwell T Hincke
Journal:  Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 7.328

5.  The mouse excisional wound splinting model, including applications for stem cell transplantation.

Authors:  Xusheng Wang; Jianfeng Ge; Edward E Tredget; Yaojiong Wu
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2013-01-17       Impact factor: 13.491

Review 6.  Recent patents on eggshell: shell and membrane applications.

Authors:  Cristianne M M Cordeiro; Maxwell T Hincke
Journal:  Recent Pat Food Nutr Agric       Date:  2011-01

7.  A statistical analysis of murine incisional and excisional acute wound models.

Authors:  David M Ansell; Laura Campbell; Helen A Thomason; Andrew Brass; Matthew J Hardman
Journal:  Wound Repair Regen       Date:  2014 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.617

Review 8.  Macrophages, Foreign Body Giant Cells and Their Response to Implantable Biomaterials.

Authors:  Zeeshan Sheikh; Patricia J Brooks; Oriyah Barzilay; Noah Fine; Michael Glogauer
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 3.623

  8 in total
  4 in total

1.  Three-dimensional structures of avian beta-microseminoproteins: insight from the chicken egg-specific beta-microseminoprotein 3 paralog.

Authors:  Franck Coste; Thierry Moreau; Valérie Labas; Magali Chessé; Mégane Bregeon; Hervé Meudal; Karine Loth; Bertrand Castaing; Nicolas Guyot; Sophie Réhault-Godbert
Journal:  FEBS Open Bio       Date:  2021-05-24       Impact factor: 2.693

2.  Identification of Age-Specific and Common Key Regulatory Mechanisms Governing Eggshell Strength in Chicken Using Random Forests.

Authors:  Faisal Ramzan; Selina Klees; Armin Otto Schmitt; David Cavero; Mehmet Gültas
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2020-04-24       Impact factor: 4.096

Review 3.  State-of-the-Art of Eggshell Waste in Materials Science: Recent Advances in Catalysis, Pharmaceutical Applications, and Mechanochemistry.

Authors:  Matej Baláž; Elena V Boldyreva; Dmitry Rybin; Stefan Pavlović; Daily Rodríguez-Padrón; Tihana Mudrinić; Rafael Luque
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2021-01-27

4.  The eggshell membrane: A potential biomaterial for corneal wound healing.

Authors:  Rosemond A Mensah; Seung Bin Jo; Hoon Kim; Sung-Min Park; Kapil D Patel; Kyong J Cho; Michael T Cook; Stewart B Kirton; Victoria Hutter; Laura E Sidney; Decio Alves-Lima; Hungyen Lin; Jung-Hwan Lee; Hae-Won Kim; David Ys Chau
Journal:  J Biomater Appl       Date:  2021-06-18       Impact factor: 2.646

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.