| Literature DB >> 31667085 |
G Arias-Robledo1,2, R Wall2, K Szpila3, D Shpeley4, T Whitworth5, T Stark6, R A King1, J R Stevens1.
Abstract
Lucilia (Diptera: Calliphoridae) is a genus of blowflies comprised largely of saprophagous and facultative parasites of livestock. Lucilia bufonivora, however, exhibits a unique form of obligate parasitism of amphibians, typically affecting wild hosts. The evolutionary route by which amphibian myiasis arose, however, is not well understood due to the low phylogenetic resolution in existing nuclear DNA phylogenies. Furthermore, the timing of when specificity for amphibian hosts arose in L. bufonivora is also unknown. In addition, this species was recently reported for the first time in North America (Canada) and, to date, no molecular studies have analysed the evolutionary relationships between individuals from Eastern and Western hemispheres. To provide broader insights into the evolution of the amphibian parasitic life history trait and to estimate when the trait first arose, a time-scaled phylogeny was inferred from a concatenated data set comprising mtDNA, nDNA and non-coding rDNA (COX1, per and ITS2 respectively). Specimens from Canada, the UK, Poland, Switzerland, the Netherlands and Germany were analysed, as well as individuals from its sister taxa, the saprophage Lucilia silvarum and a Nearctic species also implicated in amphibian myiasis, Lucilia elongata. Obligate amphibian parasitism appears to have arisen ~4 mya, likely as a result of niche displacement of a saprophagous/facultative parasite ancestor. Consistent paraphyly of L. bufonivora with respect to L. elongata across single-gene phylogenies and high mtDNA genetic distances between Nearctic and Palearctic individuals suggest on-going cryptic speciation facilitated by geographical isolation. These findings suggest that recent reports of L. bufonivora in the Nearctic do not constitute a recent introduction, but instead suggest that it remained unrecorded due to taxonomic confusion and low abundance. This is the first study to confirm the involvement of L. bufonivora in amphibian myiasis in Canada using DNA-based identification methods. CrownEntities:
Keywords: Amphibian parasitism; Blowfly; Host specialisation; Lucilia; Myiasis; Obligate parasitism
Year: 2019 PMID: 31667085 PMCID: PMC6812060 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijppaw.2019.09.005
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Parasitol Parasites Wildl ISSN: 2213-2244 Impact factor: 2.674
Specimen list. The table provides the location, name on tree, collector/provider, tissue used for DNA extraction, host (if any), their GenBank accession codes for their respective per, ITS2 and COX1 sequence data, length (bp) of ITS2 sequences and primers used for the amplification of the per gene.
If no host listed, the samples were collected in its adult stage. Country abbreviations: NL = the Netherlands; UK= United Kingdom; CHE= Switzerland; DEU = Deustchland; POL = Poland; USA= United States of America; CAN=Canada; TRK = Turkey; MX = Mexico; IRN= Iran.
*per amplification primers: 1* = (present study); 2* = and (present study); 3* = (Williams and Villet, 2013).
Accession codes in blue belong to BOLD database. NOTE: Only new sequence data were submitted to GenBank as haplotypes (shown in red text), thus specimens with the same haplotype were allocated with the same accession codes.
Additional COX1 sequences used in this study with their respective location, accession codes and public database where the sequences are available (BOLD/Genbank).
| Species | Location | Accession Code | BOLD/GenBank |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spain | GBDP15380-14 | BOLD | |
| Saskatchewan, CAN | BBDCQ387-10 | BOLD | |
| Saskatchewan, CAN | CNGSD7561-15 | BOLD | |
| Saskatchewan, CAN | GenBank | ||
| Spain | GenBank | ||
| Manitoba, CAN | SMTPR3630-16 | BOLD | |
| Vancouver, CAN | BBDCP287-10 | BOLD | |
| Washington, USA | GMNCF036-12 | BOLD | |
| Callifornia, USA | BBDIT928-11 | BOLD | |
| San Francisco, USA | GenBank | ||
| Germany | GMGMA838-14 | BOLD |
Fig. 1Location of samples for which the COX1 gene was sequenced in this study. Boxes represent the locations of individual samples: red, Lucilia elongata; orange, Lucilia silvarum; green, Lucilia bufonivora.
Primers used for the amplification of per, COX1 and ITS2. Name, sequence, source and PCR protocols are described.
| Gene | Name | Sequence | Source | Protocol | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ID | D | A | E | C | F | ||||
| GCCTTCAGATACGGTCAAAC | 94 °C 5min | 94 °C 30s | 50 °C 1min | 72 °C 30s | x36 | 72 °C 7min | |||
| CCGAGTGTGGTTTGGAGATT | |||||||||
| GGCGTTGTCAAGCTCTAGC | this study | 94 °C 5min | 94 °C 30s | 48 °C 1min | 72 °C 30s | x36 | 72 °C 7min | ||
| CCACGAATGTGAACCAACTC | |||||||||
| GCAAACCAGTAACAGCACCT | |||||||||
| GTGCCTGTACCGGTGTTG | |||||||||
| LCO1490 | GGTCAACAAATCATAAAGATATTGG | 94 °C 5min | 95 °C 30s | 45 °C 30s | 72 °C 1min | x35 | 72 °C 7min | ||
| HCO2198 | TAAACTTCAGGGTGACCAAAAAATCA | ||||||||
| ITS4 | TCCTCCGCTTATTGATATGC | *94 °C 2min | 94 °C 30s | 44 °C 35s | 72 °C 30s | x38 | 72 °C 3min | ||
| ITS5.8 | GGGACGATGAAGAACGCAGC | ||||||||
*ID = initial denaturation step, D = denaturation, A = annealing, E = extension, C = cycles of D-A-E, F = final extension.
Fig. 2Bayesian Inference tree constructed from Internal transcribed Spacer 2 (non-coding) sequence data. Each specimen is labelled with the species name and location abbreviation as indicated in Table 1. Green text corresponds to European samples of Lucilia bufonivora; red represents Lucilia elongata; purple represents Canadian L. bufonivora; orange represents Lucilia silvarum. Scale bar represents expected changes per site. (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the Web version of this article.)
Fig. 3Bayesian Inference tree constructed from COX1 (mtDNA) sequence data. Each specimen is labelled with the species name and location abbreviation as indicated in Table 1. Sequences obtained from BOLD/GenBank are also annotated with their respective accession codes. Green text corresponds to European samples of Lucilia bufonivora; red represents Lucilia elongata; purple represents Canadian L. bufonivora; orange represents Lucilia silvarum. Scale bar represents expected changes per site. (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the Web version of this article.)
The pairwise genetic distances computed with COX1 sequence data of various Lucilia specimens. Numbers in blue highlight the distance between European and Canadian Lucilia bufonivora. Letters in red highlight the distance between Lucilia sericata and Lucilia cuprina.
*n = number of sequences with the same haplotype.
Fig. 4Bayesian Inference tree constructed from per gene (nDNA) sequence data. Each specimen is labelled with the species name and location abbreviation as indicated in Table 1. Green text corresponds to European samples of Lucilia bufonivora; red represents Lucilia elongata; purple represents Canadian L. bufonivora; orange represents Lucilia silvarum. Scale bar represents expected changes per site. (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the Web version of this article.)
Fig. 5Parsimony splits network constructed from a per and ITS2 concatenated sequence data set. Heterozygous specimens are indicated with A and B. ‘bufonivora_EUROPE_A’ represents a consistent haplotype present in all 12 samples from Europe (Table 1), of which just two were heterozygous (‘bufonivora_frog’ and ‘bufonivora_NLWi’). ‘bufonivora_CAN’ and ‘elongata_CAN’ are represented by two samples each, none of which were heterozygous. Scale bar represents expected changes per site.
Fig. 6Divergence times estimated from a concatenated data set of per, COX1 and ITS2 sequences for the Lucilia bufornivora species group. Substitution model and relaxed clock models were unlinked for each gene. The tree was calibrated by setting the root to the node age corresponding to the split between Luciilinae and Calliphorinae subfamilies (~19 mya) as estimated by Wallman et al. (2005). Blue bars represent 95% highest posterior density (HPD) of each node age. (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the Web version of this article.)