Literature DB >> 31667028

A Mobile Application for Keyword Search in Real-World Scenes.

Shrinivas Pundlik1, Anikait Singh1, Gautam Baghel1, Vilte Baliutaviciute1, Gang Luo1.   

Abstract

Keyword search in a cluttered environment is difficult in general, and even more challenging for people with low vision. While magnification can help in reading for low vision people, it does not facilitate efficient visual search due to the constriction of the field of view. The motivating observation for this study is that, in a large number of visual search tasks, people know what are they looking for (i.e., they know the keywords), they just do not know where to find them in the scene. We have developed a mobile application that allows the users to input keywords (by voice or by typing), uses an optical character recognition (OCR) engine to search for the provided keyword in the scene captured by the smartphone camera, and zooms in on the instances of the keyword detected in the captured images, to facilitate efficient information acquisition. In this paper we describe the development and evaluation of various aspects of the application, including comparing the various mainstream OCR engines that power the app, and an evaluation study comparing the app to the conventional optical magnifier vision aid. Normally sighted adults, while wearing blur glasses to lower their visual acuity, performed keyword searches for a series of items ranging from easy to difficult with the app and with a handheld magnifier. While there was no difference in the search times between the two methods for the easier tasks, the app was significantly faster than the magnifier for the difficult tasks. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. For more information, see http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Low-vision aid; mobile application; optical character recognition (OCR); timed instrumental activities of daily living (TIADL) tasks

Year:  2019        PMID: 31667028      PMCID: PMC6752634          DOI: 10.1109/JTEHM.2019.2935451

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE J Transl Eng Health Med        ISSN: 2168-2372            Impact factor:   3.316


  18 in total

1.  Perceived and actual performance of daily tasks: relationship to visual function tests in individuals with retinitis pigmentosa.

Authors:  J P Szlyk; W Seiple; G A Fishman; K R Alexander; S Grover; C L Mahler
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 12.079

2.  Timed instrumental activities of daily living tasks: relationship to visual function in older adults.

Authors:  C Owsley; G McGwin; M E Sloane; B T Stalvey; J Wells
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 1.973

3.  Timed instrumental activities of daily living tasks: relationship to cognitive function and everyday performance assessments in older adults.

Authors:  Cynthia Owsley; Michael Sloane; Gerald McGwin; Karlene Ball
Journal:  Gerontology       Date:  2002 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.140

Review 4.  Occupational therapy interventions to improve the reading ability of older adults with low vision: a systematic review.

Authors:  Stacy Smallfield; Kari Clem; Ashley Myers
Journal:  Am J Occup Ther       Date:  2013 May-Jun

5.  Does Central Vision Loss Impair Visual Search Performance of Adults More than Children?

Authors:  PremNandhini Satgunam; Gang Luo
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 1.973

6.  Target search and identification performance in low vision patients.

Authors:  Manfred MacKeben; Donald C Fletcher
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2011-09-29       Impact factor: 4.799

7.  Relationship between vision impairment and ability to perform activities of daily living.

Authors:  Sharon A Haymes; Alan W Johnston; Anthony D Heyes
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 8.  Assessment of functional vision and its rehabilitation.

Authors:  August Colenbrander
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-12-17       Impact factor: 3.761

9.  The p-EVES study design and methodology: a randomised controlled trial to compare portable electronic vision enhancement systems (p-EVES) to optical magnifiers for near vision activities in visual impairment.

Authors:  John Taylor; Rachel Bambrick; Michelle Dutton; Robert Harper; Barbara Ryan; Rhiannon Tudor-Edwards; Heather Waterman; Chris Whitaker; Chris Dickinson
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2014-08-13       Impact factor: 3.117

10.  Smartphone, tablet computer and e-reader use by people with vision impairment.

Authors:  Michael D Crossland; Rui S Silva; Antonio F Macedo
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2014-07-28       Impact factor: 3.117

View more
  2 in total

1.  Influence of COVID-19 Lockdowns on the Usage of a Vision Assistance App Among Global Users With Visual Impairment: Big Data Analytics Study.

Authors:  Gang Luo; Shrinivas Pundlik
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 5.428

2.  What Visual Targets Are Viewed by Users With a Handheld Mobile Magnifier App.

Authors:  Gang Luo
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 3.283

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.