Literature DB >> 31666924

Mutational profile and genotype/phenotype correlation of non-familial pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma.

Shatha Albattal1,2, Meshael Alswailem1, Yosra Moria3, Hindi Al-Hindi4, Majed Dasouki5,6, Mohamed Abouelhoda5,6, Hala Aba Alkhail4, Entissar Alsuhaibani2, Ali S Alzahrani1,3.   

Abstract

About 30%-40% of patients with pheochromocytoma (PCC) and paraganglioma (PGL) have underlying germline mutations in certain susceptibility genes despite absent family history of these tumors. Here, we present mutational profile of 101 such patients with PCC/PGL (PPGL) from the highly consanguineous population of Saudi Arabia.
Results: Of 101 cases with PPGL, 37/101 (36.6%) had germline mutations. Mutations were detected in 30 cases by PCR and direct Sanger sequencing and in 7 additional cases by NGS. The most commonly mutated gene was SDHB (21/101 cases, 20.8%) and the most common SDHB mutation was c.268C>T, p.R90X occurring in 12/21 (57%) cases. Mutations also occurred in SDHC (4/101, 3.96%), SDHD (3/101, 3%), VHL (2/101, 2%) and MAX (2/101, 2%) genes. The following genes were mutated in 1 patient each (1%), RET, SDHA, SDHAF2, TMEM127 and NF1. Metastatic PPGL occurred in 6/21 cases (28.6%) with SDHB mutations and in 1 case with SDHAF2 mutation. Patients and
Methods: DNA was isolated from peripheral blood (53 patients) or from non-tumorous formalin fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) tissue (48 patients). PCR and direct Sanger sequencing of RET, SDHx, VHL, MAX and TMEM127 genes were performed. Cases without mutations were subjected to whole exome sequencing using next generation sequencing (NGS).
Conclusion: About 37% of PPGL without family history of such tumors harbor germline mutations. The most commonly mutated gene is SDHB followed by SDHC, SDHD, VHL, MAX and rarely RET, SDHA, SDHAF2, TMEM127 and NF1. SDHB mutations were associated with metastatic PPGL in more than a quarter of cases. Copyright:
© 2019 Albattal et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  NGS; SDHB; mutations; paraganglioma; pheochromocytoma

Year:  2019        PMID: 31666924      PMCID: PMC6800268          DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.27194

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncotarget        ISSN: 1949-2553


INTRODUCTION

Pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma (PPGL) are chromaffin cell-derived neuroendocrine tumors [1]. While having been considered mostly sporadic for long time, it has become clear over the last 2 decades that 30–40% of these tumors are due to underlying germline mutations in one of several susceptibility genes [2-4]. Nearly 30 genes have been identified with germline or somatic mutations in PPGL [3]. Apart from the well-known genes such as RET, NF1, VHL, SDHx, TMEM127, and MAX, many of the new genes have been identified in the last 7 years that include HIF2A-EPAS1, FH, H-RAS, PHD1, MDH2, ATRX, H3F3A, CSDE1, MAML3 and IRP1 (summarized in reference [4]). These genes involve at least 3 signal transduction pathways, the pseudohypoxemia, the tyrosine kinase, and the WNT pathways [3, 5]. Much more recently discovered predisposing genes for PPGL include DLST [6], SLC25A11 [7] and DNMT3A [8]. The discovery of new genes has been propagated by major advances in technology. Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) technology has made sequencing of the whole exome fairly routinely available. Many studies have been published on the molecular genetics of PPGL using this technology [3–5, 9–12]. These studies have shown some ethnic differences in the rates of mutations and the underlying genetic landscape [12-15]. There have not been comprehensive studies from the Middle East region and none from the Arabic population. These populations are homogeneous with high rates of consanguinity making them ideal for studying hereditary diseases [16]. In this paper, we report the underlying genetic mutations and the genotype/phenotype correlation in a large series of patients with PPGL from the highly consanguineous population of Saudi Arabia.

RESULTS

Patients' characterstics

A total of 101 patients were included in this study and their clinical and pathological characteristics are summarized in Table 1.
Table 1

Age, sex and pathological features of 101 cases of PPGL

CharacteristicNumber or Frequency
Age (yrs) median (Range)38 (8–81)
Sex F: M61:40
Tumor size (cm), Median (Range)5 (1–24)
Vascular Invasion10 (9.9%)
Capsular invasion19 (18.8%)
Distant Metastasis10 (9.9%)
Sites
PCC (4 Bilateral)32 (31.7%)
Abdominal PGL26 (25.7%)
Head/Neck PGL (2 bilateral)39 (38.6%)
Other sites2 (1.99%)
Multiple sites (including 4 bilateral PCC and 2 bilateral head/neck PGL)8 (7.9%)

Mutational analysis and genotype/phenotype correlation

Germline mutations were detected in 30 cases by PCR and direct Sanger sequencing. The remaining cases were subjected to whole exome sequencing using NGS as direct Sanger sequencing either did not reveal mutations in the known genes that were tested or was unsuccessful. NGS identified additional 7 cases with pathogenic variants. These 7 cases with NGS-detected mutations were subsequently confirmed by Sanger sequencing. Overall, of 101 sporadic cases of PPGL, 37 (36.6%) had germline mutations while 64 patients (63.4%) had no mutations in any of the genes known to be involved in the pathogenesis of PPGL (Table 2 and Figure 1). The most commonly mutated gene was SDHB (21/101 cases, 20.8%) followed by SDHC (4/101, 3.9%). SDHD, VHL and MAX genes were mutated in 3 (3%), 2 (2%) and 2 (2%) cases, respectively. The following genes were mutated in 1 patient each (1%), RET, SDHA, SDHAF2, TMEM127 and NF1.
Table 2

Overall results of genomic profiling of 101 cases of apparently sporadic PPGL

DiagnosisTotalMutation-positive SDHB SDHD SDHC SDHA SDHAF2 RET VHL NF1 MAX TMEM127
Unilateral PCC (1 metastatic)2841111
Bilateral PCC4312
Abd. PGL (6 metastatic)261612211
H/N PGL (2 metastatic)37105221
Bilateral H/N PGL2211
Abd. and H/N PGL111
PCC, abd. and H/N PGL111
Bladder PGL10
Intradural PGL10
Total 101 37 (36.6%) 21 (20.8%) 3 (3%) 4 (3.9%) 1 (1%) 1 (1%) 1 (1%) 2 (2%) 1 (1%) 2 (2%) 1 (1%)
Figure 1

Pie diagram showing the distribution and number of cases with germline mutations in different gene.

SDHB mutations

The majority of cases with SDHB mutations presented with abdominal PGL (14/21 cases, 66.7%) (Table 3) including one patient with combined abdominal and head and neck PGL. Five cases presented with head/neck PGL of whom one case had bilateral carotid body tumors associated with the c.689G>A, p.R230H mutation. Two cases presented with PCC (one isolated and one with mediastinal and head and neck PGL). Six cases (28.6%) developed distant metastasis (Table 3). SDHB is the most commonly mutated gene in our series (21/37 mutations, 56.8%). The non-sense mutation c.268C>T, p.R90X was the most frequent mutation occurring in 12 out of 21 cases (57%) with SDHB mutations. In 4 cases (33%) with this mutation, the disease was metastatic (Table 3).
Table 3

SDHB mutations (NM_003000.2) in 21 cases of PPGL

DiagnosisMetastaticTissueSequencingMutation Nucleotide change Mutation Amino acid change Variant status
Abdominal PGLYesBloodSangerc.412G>Ap.D138NKnown Pathogenic [51]
Abdominal PGLYesBloodSangerc.689G>Ap.R230HKnown Pathogenic [52]
Abdominal PGLYesBloodSangerc.268C>Tp.R90XKnown Pathogenic [53]
Abdominal PGLYesBloodSangerc.268C>Tp.R90XKnown Pathogenic [53]
Abdominal PGLYesBloodSangerc.268C>Tp.R90XKnown Pathogenic [53]
Abdominal PGLNoFFPESangerc.343C>Tp.R115XKnown Pathogenic [54]
Abdominal PGLNoBloodSangerc.268C>Tp.R90XKnown Pathogenic [53]
Abdominal PGLNoFFPESangerc.268C>Tp.R90XKnown Pathogenic [53]
Abdominal PGLNoFFPESangerc.268C>Tp.R90XKnown Pathogenic [53]
Abdominal PGLNoFFPESangerc.268C>Tp.R90XKnown Pathogenic [53]
Abdominal PGLNoBloodSangerc.268C>Tp.R90XKnown Pathogenic [53]
Abdominal PGLNoFFPESangerc.268C>Tp.R90XKnown Pathogenic [53]
Abdominal PGLNoFFPENGSc.637dupAp.M213fsNovel, likely pathogenic
H/N PGLNoBloodSangerc.689G>Ap.R230HKnown Pathogenic [55]
H/N PGLNoBloodSangerc.409A>Gp.K137ENovel, likely pathogenic
H/N PGLNoBloodSangerc.268C>Tp.R90XKnown Pathogenic [53]
H/N PGLNoFFPESangerc.79C>Tp.R27XKnown Pathogenic [2]
Bilateral H/N PGLNoBloodSangerc.689G>Ap.R230HKnown pathogenic [55]
Abdominal and H/N PGLYesFFPESangerc.268C>Tp.R90XKnown Pathogenic [53]
Unilateral PCCNoBloodSangerc.268C>Tp.R90XKnown Pathogenic [53]
PCC, mediastinal PGL, H/N PGLNoBloodSangerc.689G>Ap.R230HKnown Pathogenic [54]

H/N, Head and Neck; PGL, Paraganglioma; PCC, Pheochromocytoma; FFPE, Formalin Fixed Paraffin Embedded tissue

H/N, Head and Neck; PGL, Paraganglioma; PCC, Pheochromocytoma; FFPE, Formalin Fixed Paraffin Embedded tissue

SDHC mutations

Four patients had SDHC mutations. These mutations were missense in 3 cases and a splice site mutation in one case (Tables 2 and 4). Two of these 4 cases had abdominal PGL while the other two had head and neck PGL. All of these were benign tumors.
Table 4

Mutations in RET, VHL, NF1, SDHA, SDHC, SDHD, SDHAF2, TEMEM127 and MAX

DiagnosisGeneTissueSequencing Nucleotide change Amino Acid Change Variant status
Abdominal PGLRETFFPESangerc.1900T>Cp.C634RKnown Pathogenic [56]
Unilateral PCCVHLBloodSangerc.482G>Ap.R161QKnown Pathogenic [2, 57]
Bilateral PCCVHLBloodSangerc.355T>Cp.F119LKnown Pathogenic [58]
Unilateral PCCNF1BloodNGSc.4150G>Ap.E1384KNovel, VUS
Unilateral H/N PGLSDHABloodSangerc.994C>Tp.P332SNovel, likely pathogenic
Abdominal PGLSDHCFFPESangerc.305T>Cp.L102PNovel, likely pathogenic
Abdominal PGLSDHCFFPESangerc.329C>Tp.P110LNovel, likely pathogenic
H/N PGLSDHCBloodNGSc.78-2A>TSplice site mutationKnown Pathogenic [59, 60]
H/N PGLSDHCBloodSangerc.164A>Gp.H55RNovel, likely pathogenic
H/N PGLSDHDFFPESangerc.184G>Ap.A62TNovel, likely pathogenic
H/N PGLSDHDFFPESangerc.335C>Tp.T112INovel, likely pathogenic
Bilateral H/N PGLSDHDBloodSangerc.15G>Ap.W5XLikely pathogenic [2, 61]
Metastatic PCCSDHAF2BloodNGSc.438C>Ap.N146KNovel, VUS
Abdominal PGLTMEM127BloodNGSc.281G>Ap.R94QNovel, likely pathogenic
Bilateral PCCMAXBloodNGSc.196C>Tp.R66XNovel, likely pathogenic
Bilateral PCCMAXBloodNGSc.161T>Ap.I54NNovel, likely pathogenic

VUS, Variant of Unknown significance; NGS, next generation sequencing

SDHD mutations

The most common variant found was c.34G>A, p. G12S occurring in 7/10 cases with SDHD variants (70%). However, the role of this variant in the pathogenesis of PPGL has been controversial. Excluding this variant, another 3 cases had germline SDHD mutations (Table 4). They all presented with head and neck PGL (bilateral in one case). Interestingly, a case with the nonsense mutation c.15G>A, p.W5X presented with multiple recurrent head and neck PGLs (Table 4). VUS, Variant of Unknown significance; NGS, next generation sequencing

RET mutations

Only one patient without family or personal history of multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2 presented with abdominal PGL and his genetic testing revealed the well-known c.1900T>C, p.C634R (Table 4). In addition, the c.2071G>A, p.G691S variant is a single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) that was quite common occurring in 6 cases (5 PCC and 1 abdominal PGL).

Other genes

A number of other known genes were mutated and presented with interesting manifestations (Table 4). VHL mutations were detected in 2 cases (Table 4). These cases presented with bilateral PCC in one case and unilateral PCC in another case (Table 4). MAX gene was mutated in 2 cases both of whom presented with bilateral PCC. A novel SDHAF2 variant was found in one case of metastatic PCC. By in Silico analysis (Mutation taster and Polyphen2), this variant is disease causing and probably damaging with a score of 0.999. Other genes included RET, TMEM127, SDHA and NF1. Each was mutated once. The tumor type, location and the mutations in these genes are detailed in Table 4. The patient with NF1 variant does not have features of neurofibromatosis. However, the variant was confirmed on Sanger sequencing and the in Silico analysis predicted it to be highly damaging.

Mutations by tumor type

Mutations in PCC

Our study included a total of 32 cases of PCC. These include 26 cases with unilateral, 4 with bilateral and 2 metastatic PCC. Twenty-four cases (75%) had no detectable germline mutations. The other 8 (8/32, 25%) cases harbored underlying germline mutations. The underlying genes and mutations are detailed in Table 5. Bilateral PCC occurred in 4 cases and the underlying genes were MAX in 2 cases, VHL in 1 case and no identifiable mutation in another case. In one unusual case with metastatic PCC, the underlying mutation was a novel SDHAF2 variant that is likely pathogenic (Tables 4 and 5).
Table 5

Germline mutations in patients with PCC, abdominal PGL and head and neck PGL

CategoryDiagnosisGeneMutation (Nucleotide change) Mutation (Amino Acid Change)
Pheochromocytoma Unilateral PCC SDHB c.268C>Tp.R90X
Unilateral PCC NF1 c.4150G>Ap.E1384K
Metastatic PCC SDHAF2 c.438C>Ap.N146K
Unilateral PCC VHL c.482G>Ap.R161Q
Bilateral PCC VHL c.355T>Cp.F119L
Bilateral PCC MAX c.196C>Tp.R66X
Bilateral PCC MAX c.161T>Ap.I54N
Unilateral PCC, Mediastinal PGL, H/N PGL SDHB c.689G>Ap.R230H
Abdominal Paraganglioma Abdominal PGL RET c.1900T>Cp.C634R
Abdominal PGL SDHB c.637dupAp.M213fs
Abdominal PGL SDHB c.268C>Tp.R90X
Abdominal PGL SDHB c.268C>Tp.R90X
Abdominal PGL SDHB c.343C>Tp.R115X
Abdominal PGL SDHB c.268C>Tp.R90X
Abdominal PGL SDHB c.268C>Tp.R90X
Abdominal PGL SDHB c.268C>Tp.R90X
Abdominal PGL SDHB c.268C>Tp.R90X
Abdominal PGL SDHC c.305T>Cp.L102P
Abdominal PGL SDHC c.329C>Tp.P110L
Abdominal PGL TMEM127 c.281G>Ap.R94Q
Metastatic Abdominal PGL SDHB c.412G>Ap.D138N
Metastatic Abdominal PGL SDHB c.689 G>Ap.R230H
Metastatic abdominal PGL SDHB c.268C>Tp.R90X
Metastatic Abdominal PGL SDHB c.268C>Tp.R90X
Metastatic Abdominal PGL SDHB c.268C>Tp.R90X
Metastatic abdominal and H/N PGL SDHB c.268C>Tp.R90X
Head and neck paraganglioma Unilateral H/N PGL SDHA c.994C>Tp.P332S
Unilateral H/N PGL SDHB c.409A>Gp.K137E
Unilateral H/N PGL SDHB c.268C>Tp.R90X
Unilateral H/N PGL SDHB c.79C>Tp.R27X
Unilateral H/N PGL SDHB c.689G>Ap.R230H
Unilateral H/N PGL SDHC c.78-2A>TSplice site
Unilateral H/N PGL SDHC c.164A>Gp.H55R
Unilateral H/N PGL SDHD c.184G>Ap.A62T
Unilateral H/N PGL SDHD c.335C>Tp.T112I
Bilateral H/N PGL SDHB c.689G>Ap.R230H
Bilateral H/N PGL SDHD c.15G>Ap.W5X

Mutations in PGL

Overall, 69 cases of PGL were included, of which 26 abdominal PGL (6 metastatic), 35 head and neck PGL, 1 combined abdominal and head/neck PGL, 1 combined PCC, abdominal and head/neck PGLs, 1 bladder PGL, 2 bilateral head/neck PGL, 2 metastatic head and neck PGL and 1 intradural spinal PGL (Table 2). The spinal PGL occurred in a 28-year old man who presented with a 14-month history of lower back pain radiating to both hips and difficulty in walking. He had no hyperadrenergic symptoms. MRI of the spine showed an intradural tumor of 1.4 cm size at lumbar spine 3 (L3) compressing the cauda equina. Surgical resection and histolpathological examination confirmed a diagnosis of PGL with typical microscopic picture and positive Chromogranin A stain. Germline mutations were found in 29 of 69 (42%) of these PGLs while 40 cases were negative for any underlying mutation. These cases with positive mutations include 17 cases of abdominal PGL (5 metastatic), 11 cases of head and neck PGL (two bilateral) and one case of abdominal and head and neck PGLs (Table 5). The details of these mutations are summarized in Table 5.

Multiple PPGL

Four patients had bilateral PCC (2 with MAX, 1 VHL and 1 without identifiable mutation) (Table 5), one patient had synchronous abdominal and head/neck PGL (SDHB R90X mutation) (Table 5), two had bilateral head and neck PGLs (one SDHB and 1 SDHD mutation) (Table 5), and 1 patient had metachronous PCC, abdominal PGL and head and neck PGL (p.R230H SDHB mutation) (Table 5).

Metastatic PCC and PGL

Overall, 10/101 patients (10%) had metastatic PPGL and 7 of them (70%) had underlying germline mutations. Two patients had metastatic PCC (one had no mutation and one had an SDHAF2 mutation) (Tables 4 and 5). Six patients had abdominal PGL and SDHB mutations; one of them had both abdominal and head and neck PGLs (Table 3) and 2 patients had metastatic head and neck PGL (both negative for mutations). The first patient with head and neck PGL was a 38-year old lady who presented with a 7-cm left carotid body tumor that could not be completely resected as it was invading the surrounding structures and the carotid artery. Histopathologcal examination of the resected tumor confirmed the diagnosis of PGL with positive chromogranin A and synaptophysin stains and a Ki67 proliferation index of 3%. There was clear capsular and vascular invasion and positive margin. CT scan of the chest, abdomen and pelvis and MIBG whole body scan showed MIBG-avid bilateral lung metastases up to 1 cm in size. The patient was treated with surgery twice, chemotherapy and 3 doses of MIBG (cumulative dose 364 mCi) but continued to have progression of the lung metastases. She is currently stable with persistent bilateral lung metastases. The second patient was a 48-year old man who presented with a 4-year history of gradually enlarging right mid and upper neck mass with dizziness, headache and pain. CT scan of the neck, chest abdomen and pelvis showed a 6 × 4 cm right carotid body tumor and innumerable bilateral 1-1.5 cm lung, liver and skeletal metastases. These lesions were only faintly positive on MIBG but vey avid on octreotide whole body scan. Histopathological examination of the resected right carotid body tumor and biopsy from a liver lesion confirmed the diagnosis of metastatic carotid body tumor. The patient was supposed to start chemotherapy but was lost for follow up and is likely to have died secondary to the metastatic PGL.

DISCUSSION

In this study, we have comprehensively defined the genomic profile of PPGL from a previously unstudied highly consanguineous Arab population. Overall, we found a high rate (36.6%) of germline mutations in this series of patients with PPGL without family history of these tumors. In our study, SDHB mutations are the most common mutations in PPGL (20.8%) in general and in PGL in particular (30.4%). SDHC and SDHD mutations are much less common occurring in 3.9% and 3% respectively. Other genetic mutations are rare (Figure 1). None of the more recently described genes (DLST, SLC25A11 and DNMT3A) was found mutated in this study. Metastatic PPGL occurred in about 28.6% of patients (6/21) with SDHB mutations and in a patient with SDHAF2 mutation. Mutations involved in the pathogenesis of PPGL have been recently classified into 4 categories; 1. pseudohypoxemia group involving mainly the succinate dehydrogenase subgroup (SDHA, SDHB, SDHC, SDHD and SDHAF2), fumarate hydratase (FH) and the VHL-EPAS1 subgroup; 2. The Tyrosine kinase group (RET, NF1, MAX, TMEM127 and HRAS); 3. WNT-related pathway (somatic mutations in MAML3 and CSDE1); and 4. adrenocortical admixture group [3]. The last group is less clear than others and its existence is controversial [17, 18]. Our study showed that most mutations involve the pseudohypoxemia group with the vast majority occurring in SDHB and to a lesser extent in SDHC and SDHD. These mutations occurred commonly in PGL but very rarely in PCC. SDHB was the most commonly mutated gene (56.8% of patients with positive mutations and 20.8% of all cases studied) and c.268C>T, p.R90X was the most common mutation (Tables 2 and 3). The high frequency of this mutation suggests that it might be a founder mutation in the studied population. By contrast, in the recently published TCGA data from an international consortium population, SDHB germline mutations occurred only in 9.8% (17/173 cases) and the p.R90X mutation occurred only in 1/17 cases [3]. The most frequent SDHB mutation in TCGA data was p.I127S (5/17 cases), which was not found in our patients [3]. This suggests significant ethnic differences in the molecular genetics of PPGL. By contrast, in the original report of germline mutations in non-syndromic PCC from Europe, SDHB mutations were found in 12 of 271 (4.4%) apparently sporadic PPGL (mostly PCC) [2] which is not much different from our study in which 2 out of 32 (6.3%) PCC carry SDHB mutations. A more recent report from Spain in which 329 sporadic single non-familial PPGL were tested for mutations showed an overall prevalence of germline mutations of 14%. Similar to our study, PGL were more commonly mutated (28.7% vs. 42% in our study) and most mutations occurred in SDHB (63% vs. 56.8% in our study) followed by SDHD (13% vs. 8% in our study) and SDHC (4.3% vs. 10.8% in our study) with other genes being rarely mutated [19]. In another study from USA, a review of 129 cases of PPGL who underwent surgery was undertaken and of 42 patients that were tested, 21 (50%) were positive for germline mutations. However, some of those cases were syndromic PPGL [20]. Another study from India reviewed 150 cases of PPGL of whom 30 cases were syndromic PPGL. These cases were tested only for 5 genes (RET, VHL, SDHB, SDHD and SDHC). All 30 syndromic PPGL were positive for germline mutations while in 120 cases of this series with sporadic PPGL, 19 (15.8%) had germline mutations with VHL, SDHB and SDHD being the most commonly mutated genes [21]. In the current study, SDHC mutations were the second most common mutations in PGL occurring in 4 out of 37 cases (10.8%) with positive mutations. This is unusual as the literature cited SDHC-associated PGL to be much less common than SDHB and SDHD-associated PGL [22-25]. In a review of a number of series with more than 3000 patients with PPGL, SDHC mutations occurred only in 1% of cases (31/3193 cases) [1]. In the TCGA data, SDHC mutations were not found [3]. Similarly, in a recent report from Europe, SDHC mutations were not found in 87 cases of PCC [24]. An SDHC founder mutation (c.397C>T, p. Arg133Ter) was detected in about 70% of a cohort of 29 French Canadian patients presenting mostly (70%) with head and neck PGL and with distant metastasis in 30% of them [26]. In our study, two of the SDHC-associated PGL occurred in the head and neck and two were abdominal PGL. All of these 4 cases were benign PGL. Other studies have shown that SDHC-related PGL commonly occur in the head and neck region but also in the mediastinum and abdominal regions [22, 23]. SDHD mutations occurred in three cases with head and neck PGL, two unilateral and one bilateral. Apart from these 3 cases, the most common SDHD variant found in this study was the c.34G>A, p.G12S occurring in 7 cases. The pathogenicity of this variant has been controversial with some studies suggesting that it is pathogenic while others suggested that is a non-pathogenic SNP [27-29]. This variant was not reported in the TCGA data [3]. If considered pathogenic, SDHD mutations would be the second most common mutations after SDHB (10/48, 20.8%). However, we considered it to be non-pathogenic as it also occurred in the normal Saudi Genome Project database (MIF 0.046%). In fact, all SDHD mutations were also rare in the TCGA data occurring only in 3 out of 173 cases (2%) [3]. However, TCGA study excluded head and neck PGL in which SDHD mutation most commonly occur [30]. Other pseudohypoxia genes were much less frequently mutated. SDHA mutations occurred only once in a patient with carotid body tumor (Table 4). Mutations in this gene are rare but can be associated with aggressive metastatic PGL similar to those of SDHB [31, 32]. One patient had an SDHAF2 variant of unknown significance and presented with metastatic PCC. SDHAF2 mutations are extremely rare and their association with metastatic PPGL has not been reported. However, this variant was assessed to be disease causing by mutation taster and probably damaging with a score of 0.999 on Polyphen2 analysis. In a large study from Spain and Netherland with more than 430 patients with SDHB- and SDHD- negative sporadic and familial PPGL tested specifically for SDHAF2, none was found to have SDHAF2 mutation [33]. SDHAF2 mutations were not also reported in TCGA data [3]. VHL mutations were detected in two patients; one with unilateral and one with bilateral PCC. VHL mutations have been commonly reported in hereditary PPGL and can be associated with unilateral or bilateral PCC or less frequently with PGL [2, 34]. Of the tyrosine kinase group, RET mutation occurred in only 1 case of abdominal PGL. Interestingly, MAX mutations occurred in 2 cases of PCC, both of whom presented with bilateral PCC. MAX mutations-associated PCC tend to be bilateral and may metastasize to distant sites [35]. In a study of 972 cases from the European-American-Asian Pheochromocytoma and Paraganglioma Registry without mutations in the common PPGL genes, 58 had mutations in less commonly mutated genes (SDHA, TMEM127, SDHAF2) including 8 cases of PCC with MAX mutations. Two of these 8 cases were bilateral PCC [32]. We also found one case with a TMEM127 mutation in an abdominal PGL. TMEM127 mutations are generally more frequent than MAX mutations and may present with PCC, abdominal or head and neck PGL [32, 36]. Distant metastases are associated with unfavorable prognosis and are essentially incurable [37, 38]. Genetic markers that may predict development of metastatic PPGL can be of significant value for early and more effective intervention and closer follow up [39-44]. SDHB mutations have been associated with increased risk of distant metastasis [45-49]. The association between other gene mutations and distant metastasis are less clear [40, 43]. In this study, SDHB mutations remain the most frequently associated mutations with distant metastasis occurring in 6 out of 21 cases (28.6%). Only one additional case with an SDHAF2 variant developed distant metastasis. However, 3 cases with distant metastasis had no detectable mutations in any of known or potential candidate gene. Our study is the first to evaluate the rates, types of germline mutations and the phenotype-genotype correlation in a large series of PPGL from an Arab population. However, it has some shortcomings including limitation of our study to germline mutations. Some previously reported mutations are somatic, particularly the WNT-related MAML4 fusion and HRAS mutations [3]. We have not included patients with positive family history of PPGL since our aim was to assess the rates of undiagnosed hereditary cases and to discover cases that seem sporadic. However, data from this study from an Arab population strongly supports genetic screening for patients with PPGL in this population since the frequency of germline mutations is high. It also suggests that for targeted sequencing, SDHB should be the first gene to be tested, especially in patients with abdominal or metastatic PGL. Other genes, especially SDHC and SDHD should be tested when mutations are not found in SDHB or the clinical presentation suggests a likely genetic mutation (e. g. VHL and MAX in bilateral PCC). In conclusion, approximately 37% of our patients with non-familial PPGL harbor germline mutations in different susceptibility genes. The most commonly mutated gene is SDHB presenting mostly with abdominal PGL and less frequently with head and neck PGL. It is also associated with the highest risk of distant metastasis. SDHC and SDHD mutations are the second most common genetic alterations in PGL. VHL and MAX mutations occur mainly in PCC and tend to present with bilateral disease. Other genetic alterations are rare but have unique presentations.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients

We studied all patients of PPGL who have no definite family history of such tumors and were seen at the King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center (KFSHRC), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia during the period of January 2003-January 2019. KFSHRC is the main tertiary care center in Saudi Arabia where most cases of PPGL are referred to. Over this period, we managed 101 patients with non-familial PPGL. To avoid selection bias, we excluded patients with known familial PPGL syndromes. All cases underwent surgery and the histopathological examination confirmed the diagnosis of PPGL. The patients’ characteristics are summarized in Table 1.

Samples

We obtained an Institutional Review Board approval from the Office of Research Affairs of the KFSHRC. Informed consents for all prospective blood sample collection were obtained from the patients or their guardians. We collected blood samples from 53 cases. However, in cases where blood samples were not available for testing, we used formalin fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) non-tumorous tissue (48 patients). To ensure that testing is for germline mutations, the tissue was carefully selected by an experienced pathologist (H. A) from previously surgically removed normal tissues avoiding any tumor tissue. Genomic DNA was isolated from peripheral blood leucocytes using the Gentra Blood Kit (Qiagen Corp, Valencia, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. For isolation of DNA from FFPE, DNA was extracted using a commercial DNA extraction kit (QIAamp DNA FFPE Tissue Kit, QIAGEN, Catalog No. 56404) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. DNA was quantified using a nanodrop2000 spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific, Wilmington, DE, USA) and its purity was assured by the A260/280 ratio of ≥ 1.8 indicating good purity DNA. We performed polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and direct Sanger sequencing using Big Dye terminator v3.1 cycle sequencing reaction kit and an ABI PRISM 3730XL genetic analyzer (Applied Biosystems) to detect mutations in RET, SDHA, SDHB, SDHC, SDHD, SDHAF2, VHL, MAX and TMEM127. The primers and PCR conditions have been published previously [2, 11, 50]. When a pathogenic mutation was found in one of these genes, no further testing was performed in the remaining genes. This approach led to identification of 30 pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants in any one of these genes (Table 2). We subjected the remaining cases in whom no mutation was found by PCR and Sanger sequencing or when Sanger sequencing was unsuccessful or unclear to NGS-based whole exome analysis. Variants reported by NGS were subsequently confirmed by direct Sanger Sequencing.

Whole exome sequencing

Whole exome sequencing was achieved using the Ion Proton platform (AmpliSeq kit). Briefly, 100 ng DNA from each sample were collected and the extracted DNA is then amplified using AmpliSeq HiFi mix (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA) for 10 cycles. The resultant PCR products were then pooled followed by primer digestion using FuPa reagent (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA). A ligation step was then conducted using Ion P1 and Ion Xpress Barcode adapters. After that the libraries were purified and quantified using qPCR and the Ion Library Quantification Kit (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA). The next step included emulsion of the libraries using Ion OneTouch System to attach the DNA fragments to the Ion Sphere particles. The final step in the library preparation included enrichment of the Ion Sphere particles using Ion OneTouch ES (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA). Once the library became ready, they are loaded on the sequencing chip which is then inserted into the Ion Proton instrument (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA) for sequencing.

Bioinformatics analysis

For bioinformatics analysis, we used the Torrent Suite (https://github.com/iontorrent/TS) analysis kit, using the manufacturer’s recommended parameters for base calling and alignment. The first step after base calling is to check the reads for quality and trim the low-quality parts. Then the reads are aligned to the reference human genome (version hg19) using the manufacturer’s recommended parameters. After the alignment, we used the variant calling pipeline of the Torrent suite both of which are based on the BWA-GATK pipeline, but they were more tuned to the Ion Torrent technology, by including flow signal information and library of common sequencing error motifs to improve the accuracy. After variant calling, we ran the in-house developed annotation pipeline. This pipeline is based on the Annovar package (http://annovar.openbioinformatics.org), which includes about 40 databases. We also added more information tracks including variant frequencies from the database of the Saudi Human Genome Program. To speed up the analysis, the list of annotated variants per each sample was filtered to remove intronic and synonymous variants. The remaining variants were then prioritized based on the following criteria: 1) Existence in the set of genes which are known to be related to the disease, 2) the effect score (whether the variant is truncating/damaging or not), 3) frequency in public databases and Saudi population.

Quality of sequencing

The sequencing quality was assessed using different metrics. These showed that the target regions are well covered by the NGS reads (99.6% total average coverage at 1× and 96.88% average coverage at 20×) with an average depth of 224 (i. e. each base in the target region is covered by 224 reads on average). Genetic variants detected by NGS were subsequently confirmed by PCR and targeted Sanger sequencing of the exons/introns in which these variants were found.
  61 in total

1.  Mutations in SDHD, a mitochondrial complex II gene, in hereditary paraganglioma.

Authors:  B E Baysal; R E Ferrell; J E Willett-Brozick; E C Lawrence; D Myssiorek; A Bosch; A van der Mey; P E Taschner; W S Rubinstein; E N Myers; C W Richard; C J Cornelisse; P Devilee; B Devlin
Journal:  Science       Date:  2000-02-04       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  SDHB mutation carriers with malignant pheochromocytoma respond better to CVD.

Authors:  L Fishbein; S Ben-Maimon; S Keefe; K Cengel; D A Pryma; A Loaiza-Bonilla; D L Fraker; K L Nathanson; D L Cohen
Journal:  Endocr Relat Cancer       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 5.678

3.  Somatic and occult germ-line mutations in SDHD, a mitochondrial complex II gene, in nonfamilial pheochromocytoma.

Authors:  O Gimm; M Armanios; H Dziema; H P Neumann; C Eng
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2000-12-15       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 4.  Risk of malignant paraganglioma in SDHB-mutation and SDHD-mutation carriers: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Leonie Theresia van Hulsteijn; Olaf M Dekkers; Frederik J Hes; Jan W A Smit; E P M Corssmit
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2012-10-25       Impact factor: 6.318

5.  Three novel VHL germline mutations in Korean patients with von Hippel-Lindau disease and pheochromocytomas.

Authors:  Hio Chung Kang; Il-Jin Kim; Jae-Hyun Park; Yong Shin; Sang-Geun Jang; Sun-A Ahn; Hye-Won Park; Sun-Kyung Lim; Seung Keun Oh; Dae Jung Kim; Kwan Woo Lee; Young-Sik Choi; Young Joo Park; Min Ro Lee; Duck-Woo Kim; Jae-Gahb Park
Journal:  Oncol Rep       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.906

6.  Exome sequencing identifies MAX mutations as a cause of hereditary pheochromocytoma.

Authors:  Iñaki Comino-Méndez; Francisco J Gracia-Aznárez; Francesca Schiavi; Iñigo Landa; Luis J Leandro-García; Rocío Letón; Emiliano Honrado; Rocío Ramos-Medina; Daniela Caronia; Guillermo Pita; Alvaro Gómez-Graña; Aguirre A de Cubas; Lucía Inglada-Pérez; Agnieszka Maliszewska; Elisa Taschin; Sara Bobisse; Giuseppe Pica; Paola Loli; Rafael Hernández-Lavado; José A Díaz; Mercedes Gómez-Morales; Anna González-Neira; Giovanna Roncador; Cristina Rodríguez-Antona; Javier Benítez; Massimo Mannelli; Giuseppe Opocher; Mercedes Robledo; Alberto Cascón
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2011-06-19       Impact factor: 38.330

7.  Germline mutations and genotype-phenotype correlation in Asian Indian patients with pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma.

Authors:  Reshma Pandit; Kranti Khadilkar; Vijaya Sarathi; Rajeev Kasaliwal; Manjunath Goroshi; Shruti Khare; Sandhya Nair; Vijaya Raghavan; Abhay Dalvi; Priya Hira; Gwendolyn Fernandes; Pragati Sathe; Amey Rojekar; Gaurav Malhotra; Ganesh Bakshi; Gagan Prakash; Anil Bhansali; Rama Walia; Sadishkumar Kamalanathan; Jayaprakash Sahoo; Ankush Desai; Nikhil Bhagwat; Prashanth Mappa; Rajesh Rajput; Sudha Rao Chandrashekhar; Vyankatesh Shivane; Padma Menon; Anurag Lila; Tushar Bandgar; Nalini Shah
Journal:  Eur J Endocrinol       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 6.664

8.  Screening of mutations in genes that predispose to hereditary paragangliomas and pheochromocytomas.

Authors:  S Lefebvre; F Borson-Chazot; N Boutry-Kryza; N Wion; F Schillo; J-L Peix; L Brunaud; A Finat; A Calender; S Giraud
Journal:  Horm Metab Res       Date:  2012-04-19       Impact factor: 2.936

9.  Disomy as the genetic underlying mechanisms of loss of heterozigosity in SDHD-paragangliomas.

Authors:  Elena Beristain; Maria-Angeles Vicente; Isabel Guerra; Francisco-Borja Gutiérrez-Corres; Intza Garin; Guiomar Perez de Nanclares
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2013-03-14       Impact factor: 5.958

10.  Genetic evidence of a precisely tuned dysregulation in the hypoxia signaling pathway during oncogenesis.

Authors:  Sophie Couvé; Charline Ladroue; Elodie Laine; Karène Mahtouk; Justine Guégan; Sophie Gad; Hélène Le Jeune; Marion Le Gentil; Gregory Nuel; William Y Kim; Bernard Lecomte; Jean-Christophe Pagès; Christine Collin; Françoise Lasne; Patrick R Benusiglio; Brigitte Bressac-de Paillerets; Jean Feunteun; Vladimir Lazar; Anne-Paule Gimenez-Roqueplo; Nathalie M Mazure; Philippe Dessen; Luba Tchertanov; David R Mole; William Kaelin; Peter Ratcliffe; Stéphane Richard; Betty Gardie
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2014-11-04       Impact factor: 12.701

View more
  6 in total

1.  Identification of a TMEM127 variant in a patient with paraganglioma and acromegaly.

Authors:  Beryl Stütz; Marta Korbonits; Karl Kothbauer; Werner Müller; Stefan Fischli
Journal:  Endocrinol Diabetes Metab Case Rep       Date:  2020-09-23

2.  Genetic and Clinical Profiles of Pheochromocytoma and Paraganglioma: A Single Center Study.

Authors:  Xiaosen Ma; Ming Li; Anli Tong; Fen Wang; Yunying Cui; Xuebin Zhang; Yushi Zhang; Shi Chen; Yuxiu Li
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2020-12-11       Impact factor: 5.555

3.  Recurrent Germline Mutations of CHEK2 as a New Susceptibility Gene in Patients with Pheochromocytomas and Paragangliomas.

Authors:  Yinjie Gao; Chao Ling; Xiaosen Ma; Huiping Wang; Yunying Cui; Min Nie; Anli Tong
Journal:  Int J Endocrinol       Date:  2021-09-30       Impact factor: 3.257

4.  Recurrent paraganglioma of the vulva: A rare case report and review of the literature.

Authors:  Wenzhi Kong; Qingxi Qu; Shiqian Zhang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-08-26       Impact factor: 5.738

5.  One genotype, many phenotypes: SDHB p.R90X mutation-associated paragangliomas.

Authors:  Ali S Alzahrani; Meshael Alswailem; Yosra Moria; Ayman Aldeheshi; Hindi Al-Hindi
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2020-08-17       Impact factor: 3.633

6.  Succinate Dehydrogenase Complex Iron Sulfur Subunit B (SDHB) Immunohistochemistry in Pheochromocytoma, Head and Neck Paraganglioma, Thoraco-Abdomino-Pelvic Paragangliomas: Is It a Good Idea to Use in Routine Work?

Authors:  Aylin Ege Gul; Sevinc Hallac Keser; Nagehan Ozdemir Barisik; Yesim Saliha Gurbuz; Sibel Sensu; Nusret Erdogan
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2021-06-01
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.