| Literature DB >> 31666514 |
Shu-Hua Wang1, Junpei Yue1, Wei Dong1,2, Tong-Tong Zuo1,2, Jin-Yi Li1,2, Xiaolong Liu1, Xu-Dong Zhang1,2, Lin Liu1,2, Ji-Lei Shi1,2, Ya-Xia Yin1,2, Yu-Guo Guo3,4.
Abstract
Metallic lithium affords the highest theoretical capacity and lowest electrochemical potential and is viewed as a leading contender as an anode for high-energy-density rechargeable batteries. However, the poor wettability of molten lithium does not allow it to spread across the surface of lithiophobic substrates, hindering the production and application of this anode. Here we report a general chemical strategy to overcome this dilemma by reacting molten lithium with functional organic coatings or elemental additives. The Gibbs formation energy and newly formed chemical bonds are found to be the governing factor for the wetting behavior. As a result of the improved wettability, a series of ultrathin lithium of 10-20 μm thick is obtained together with impressive electrochemical performance in lithium metal batteries. These findings provide an overall guide for tuning the wettability of molten lithium and offer an affordable strategy for the large-scale production of ultrathin lithium, and could be further extended to other alkali metals, such as sodium and potassium.Entities:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31666514 PMCID: PMC6821877 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-019-12938-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nat Commun ISSN: 2041-1723 Impact factor: 14.919
Fig. 1Schematic of an ultrathin Li layer formed onto lithiophobic substrates. Contact schematic of molten Li and the Cu substrate without (a, b) and with (c, d) the functional coating. e Molecular structures of various functional coatings
Fig. 2Wettability of molten Li onto various substrates and the prepared ultrathin Li layer. Molten Li shows a poor wettability on planar Cu (a), copper foam (b), iron foam (c), nickel foam (d), carbon fiber (e), and oxidized graphite (f). g The contact angle of planar Cu is 140°. With the organic coating of abietic resin, the surface wetting of molten Li onto various substrates is improved. Ultrathin Li is formed on copper foam (h), iron foam (i), nickel foam (j), carbon fiber (k), and oxidized graphite (l). m XRD of prepared ultrathin Li. n EPMA image of ultrathin Li. o Elemental distribution image of C and O on the ultrathin Li. Scale bars are 20 µm in n, o
Fig. 3Mechanism of improved wettability on planar Cu by coating the substrate with abietic resin. a EPMA image of the bottom surface of ultrathin Li when it peeled off from the Cu substrate. b Elemental distribution image of O and C on the bottom surface. c Fourier infrared spectra of ultrathin Li on the bottom surface of the substrate. d Elemental distribution of Li+ and C+ probed via Tof-SIMS. e Elemental distribution map of Li+ on the bottom surface of ultrathin Li after etching 50 layers. f Elemental distribution map of Li+ on the bottom layer of ultrathin Li after etching 179 layers. g XPS spectra of C 1s for the abietic resin coating. XPS spectra of C 1s (h) and Li 1s (i) on the bottom surface of ultrathin Li layer when peeled off from the Cu substrate. j XPS spectra of Li 1s for the bottom surface of ultrathin Li after the carbon-enriched layer was removed by DOL. Scale bars are 20 µm in a, b, e, f
Fig. 4Common characteristics of wettability onto various lithiophobic substrates. a ΔrG for some feasible reactions at 250 °C to improve the wettability. b Bond energies of the newly formed bonds. c Electronegativities of various elements in the periodic table and ΔrG of elements or compounds reacted with the molten Li. The elements in green and blue colors represent the elements could react with molten Li at the temperature of 180–300 °C, and form new chemical bonds, which is responsible for the improved wettability
Fig. 5Theoretical calculation of the newly formed ionic bonds based on chemisorption. a–c The newly formed ionic bond between Li and Cu clusters. d The newly formed ionic bond between Li and abietic acid