Literature DB >> 31665828

Retrospective serological analysis reveals presence of the emerging lagovirus RHDV2 in Australia in wild rabbits at least five months prior to its first detection.

Tanja Strive1,2, Melissa Piper1, Nina Huang1,2, Roslyn Mourant1, John Kovaliski3, Lorenzo Capucci4, Tarnya E Cox2,5, Ina Smith1.   

Abstract

The lagovirus rabbit haemorrhagic disease virus (RHDV) has been circulating in Australia since the mid-1990s when it was released to control overabundant rabbit populations. In recent years, the viral diversity of different RHDVs in Australia has increased, and currently four different types of RHDV are known to be circulating. To allow for ongoing epidemiological studies and impact assessments of these viruses on Australian wild rabbit populations, it is essential that serological tools are updated. To this end, reference sera were produced against all four virulent RHDVs (RHDV, RHDV2 and two different strains of RHDVa) known to be present in Australia and tested in a series of available immunological assays originally developed for the prototype RHDV, to assess patterns of cross-reactivity and the usefulness of these assays to detect lagovirus antibodies, either in a generic or specific manner. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) developed to detect antibody isotypes IgM, IgA and IgG were sufficiently cross-reactive to detect antibodies raised against all four virulent lagoviruses. For the more specific detection of antibodies to the antigenically more different RHDV2, a competition ELISA was adapted using RHDV2-specific monoclonal antibodies in combination with Australian viral antigen. Archival serum banks from a long-term rabbit monitoring site where rabbits were sampled quarterly over a period of 6 years were re-screened using this assay and revealed serological evidence for the arrival of RHDV2 in this population at least 5 months prior to its initial detection in Australia in a dead rabbit in May 2015. The serological methods and reference reagents described here will provide valuable tools to study presence, prevalence and impact of RHDV2 on Australian rabbit populations; however, the discrimination of different antigenic variants of RHDVs as well as mixed infections at the serological level remains challenging.
© 2019 Blackwell Verlag GmbH.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ELISA; biological control; differential diagnostic; epidemiology; rabbit biocontrol; serology

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31665828     DOI: 10.1111/tbed.13403

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transbound Emerg Dis        ISSN: 1865-1674            Impact factor:   5.005


  3 in total

1.  Immunological Cross-Protection between Different Rabbit Hemorrhagic Disease Viruses-Implications for Rabbit Biocontrol and Vaccine Development.

Authors:  Tiffany W O'Connor; Andrew J Read; Robyn N Hall; Tanja Strive; Peter D Kirkland
Journal:  Vaccines (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-22

Review 2.  A Review on the Methods Used for the Detection and Diagnosis of Rabbit Hemorrhagic Disease Virus (RHDV).

Authors:  Joana Abrantes; Ana M Lopes
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2021-04-30

3.  Age and Infectious Dose Significantly Affect Disease Progression after RHDV2 Infection in Naïve Domestic Rabbits.

Authors:  Robyn N Hall; Tegan King; Tiffany O'Connor; Andrew J Read; Jane Arrow; Katherine Trought; Janine Duckworth; Melissa Piper; Tanja Strive
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2021-06-21       Impact factor: 5.048

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.