Literature DB >> 31665262

mCSM-AB2: guiding rational antibody design using graph-based signatures.

Yoochan Myung1,2,3, Carlos H M Rodrigues1,2,3, David B Ascher1,2,3,4, Douglas E V Pires1,2,3,5.   

Abstract

MOTIVATION: A lack of accurate computational tools to guide rational mutagenesis has made affinity maturation a recurrent challenge in antibody (Ab) development. We previously showed that graph-based signatures can be used to predict the effects of mutations on Ab binding affinity.
RESULTS: Here we present an updated and refined version of this approach, mCSM-AB2, capable of accurately modelling the effects of mutations on Ab-antigen binding affinity, through the inclusion of evolutionary and energetic terms. Using a new and expanded database of over 1800 mutations with experimental binding measurements and structural information, mCSM-AB2 achieved a Pearson's correlation of 0.73 and 0.77 across training and blind tests, respectively, outperforming available methods currently used for rational Ab engineering.
AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: mCSM-AB2 is available as a user-friendly and freely accessible web server providing rapid analysis of both individual mutations or the entire binding interface to guide rational antibody affinity maturation at http://biosig.unimelb.edu.au/mcsm_ab2. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31665262     DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btz779

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioinformatics        ISSN: 1367-4803            Impact factor:   6.937


  13 in total

1.  mmCSM-AB: guiding rational antibody engineering through multiple point mutations.

Authors:  Yoochan Myung; Douglas E V Pires; David B Ascher
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2020-07-02       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 2.  Progress and challenges for the machine learning-based design of fit-for-purpose monoclonal antibodies.

Authors:  Rahmad Akbar; Habib Bashour; Puneet Rawat; Philippe A Robert; Eva Smorodina; Tudor-Stefan Cotet; Karine Flem-Karlsen; Robert Frank; Brij Bhushan Mehta; Mai Ha Vu; Talip Zengin; Jose Gutierrez-Marcos; Fridtjof Lund-Johansen; Jan Terje Andersen; Victor Greiff
Journal:  MAbs       Date:  2022 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 5.857

3.  Evaluating hierarchical machine learning approaches to classify biological databases.

Authors:  Pâmela M Rezende; Joicymara S Xavier; David B Ascher; Gabriel R Fernandes; Douglas E V Pires
Journal:  Brief Bioinform       Date:  2022-07-18       Impact factor: 13.994

4.  CSM-Potential: mapping protein interactions and biological ligands in 3D space using geometric deep learning.

Authors:  Carlos H M Rodrigues; David B Ascher
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2022-05-24       Impact factor: 19.160

5.  CSM-carbohydrate: protein-carbohydrate binding affinity prediction and docking scoring function.

Authors:  Thanh Binh Nguyen; Douglas E V Pires; David B Ascher
Journal:  Brief Bioinform       Date:  2022-01-17       Impact factor: 13.994

6.  An expanded benchmark for antibody-antigen docking and affinity prediction reveals insights into antibody recognition determinants.

Authors:  Johnathan D Guest; Thom Vreven; Jing Zhou; Iain Moal; Jeliazko R Jeliazkov; Jeffrey J Gray; Zhiping Weng; Brian G Pierce
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2021-02-03       Impact factor: 5.871

7.  DynaMut2: Assessing changes in stability and flexibility upon single and multiple point missense mutations.

Authors:  Carlos H M Rodrigues; Douglas E V Pires; David B Ascher
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2020-09-11       Impact factor: 6.725

8.  mCSM-membrane: predicting the effects of mutations on transmembrane proteins.

Authors:  Douglas E V Pires; Carlos H M Rodrigues; David B Ascher
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2020-07-02       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  Predicting antibody affinity changes upon mutations by combining multiple predictors.

Authors:  Yoichi Kurumida; Yutaka Saito; Tomoshi Kameda
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-11-11       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Distinguishing between PTEN clinical phenotypes through mutation analysis.

Authors:  Stephanie Portelli; Lucy Barr; Alex G C de Sá; Douglas E V Pires; David B Ascher
Journal:  Comput Struct Biotechnol J       Date:  2021-05-21       Impact factor: 7.271

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.