Literature DB >> 31665041

Prognostic performance of age-adapted SOFA and qSOFA in septic children.

Xuepeng Zhang1,2, Xiying Gui1, Kaiying Yang2, Siyuan Chen3, Yi Ji4.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31665041      PMCID: PMC6819537          DOI: 10.1186/s13054-019-2609-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care        ISSN: 1364-8535            Impact factor:   9.097


× No keyword cloud information.
Dear editors: The criteria used to define pediatric sepsis have not been updated for nearly 15 years since the establishment of the 2005 International Pediatric Sepsis Consensus. Some investigators adapted the Sepsis 3.0 criteria to pediatric sepsis definition [1]. Between January 2018 and July 2019, we prospectively enrolled 342 children from PICU (Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT03598127) with sepsis on admission according to the 2005 Pediatric Sepsis Consensus. Age-adapted SOFA and quick SOFA (qSOFA) were used as described in a previous study [1]. We assessed the performance of age-adapted SOFA and qSOFA, Pediatric Risk of Mortality (PRISM), and pediatric logistic organ dysfunction (PELOD)-2 scores on predicting mortality among septic children by using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC). The median age was 9 months, and 192 children (56.14%) were boys (Table 1); 20 children died in hospital, with a mortality rate of almost 6%. Performances of the four tools on discriminating survival are showed in Fig. 1: the PELOD-2 scores and PRISM scores had good discrimination (0.871, 95%CI 0.831–0.905 and 0.868, 95%CI 0.828–0.902 respectively), better than age-adapted SOFA scores (0.790, 95% CI 0.743–0.832). Age-adapted qSOFA had the smallest AUROC (0.639, 95% CI 0.586–0.690).
Table 1

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicsValue
Age, months9.00 (2.75, 42.0)
Male, n (%)192 (56.14%)
Source of infection, n (%)
 Respiratory system187 (54.68%)
 Gastrointestinal system81 (23.68%)
 Central nervous system13 (3.8%)
 Bloodstream33 (9.65%)
 Other28 (8.19%)
Length of ICU stay, days7.90 (4.50, 13.60)
PRISM8.0 (6.0, 13.0)
PELOD-24.0 (2.0, 6.0)
qSOFA2.0 (1.0, 3.0)
SOFA4.0 (3.0, 7.0)
Mortality, n (%)20 (5.85%)

Data are presented as median (interquartile range) or number (percentage)

Abbreviations: PICU pediatric intensive care unit, PRISM Pediatric Risk of Mortality, PELOD-2, pediatric logistic organ dysfunction-2, qSOFA quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment, SOFA Sequential Organ Failure Assessment

Fig. 1

ROC for PRISM, PELOD-2, qSOFA, and SOFA scores

Baseline characteristics Data are presented as median (interquartile range) or number (percentage) Abbreviations: PICU pediatric intensive care unit, PRISM Pediatric Risk of Mortality, PELOD-2, pediatric logistic organ dysfunction-2, qSOFA quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment, SOFA Sequential Organ Failure Assessment ROC for PRISM, PELOD-2, qSOFA, and SOFA scores Our data revealed that age-adapted qSOFA may not be a good predictor of mortality for pediatric sepsis. Quick SOFA has a range from 0 to 3. It is possible that four variations may be insufficient to describe various severity of sepsis. In addition, scoring of Glasgow coma scale (GCS) score may be inaccurate in children, especially in young infants. Age-adapted qSOFA may be sensitive in recognizing patients with sepsis and facilitates clinicians to quickly find out children who are at high risk for sepsis. However, when considering the limited specificity, promoting qSOFA in children with sepsis may have little benefit. It was reported that the mortality in pediatric sepsis was 3.5–4.4% [2, 3], which is similar to or even lower than the general mortality in PICU [4, 5] but much lower than the mortality in adult sepsis. Should we urge to adapt qSOFA to pediatric sepsis, in which the mortality is not higher than that in general ICU population? Maybe we could focus our attention on the patients with septic shock in whom the mortality is higher than 30%, as this may be more helpful to improve outcomes in children with sepsis.
  5 in total

1.  Epidemiology of Sepsis in Children Admitted to PICUs in South America.

Authors:  Daniela Carla de Souza; Huei Hsin Shieh; Eliane Roseli Barreira; Andrea Maria Cordeiro Ventura; Albert Bousso; Eduardo Juan Troster
Journal:  Pediatr Crit Care Med       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 3.624

2.  International comparison of the performance of the paediatric index of mortality (PIM) 2 score in two national data sets.

Authors:  Stéphane Leteurtre; Bruno Grandbastien; Francis Leclerc; Roger Parslow
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2012-05-09       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  An epidemiologic survey of pediatric sepsis in regional hospitals in China.

Authors:  Yuanyuan Wang; Bo Sun; Hongni Yue; Xiaofei Lin; Bing Li; Xiaochun Yang; Chunming Shan; Yujin Fan; Maotian Dong; Yixing Zhang; Wenlong Lin; Xiaofeng Zuo; Ping Su; Yongbo Heng; Jinzhong Xu; Niranjan Kissoon
Journal:  Pediatr Crit Care Med       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 3.624

4.  Prognostic accuracy of age-adapted SOFA, SIRS, PELOD-2, and qSOFA for in-hospital mortality among children with suspected infection admitted to the intensive care unit.

Authors:  Luregn J Schlapbach; Lahn Straney; Rinaldo Bellomo; Graeme MacLaren; David Pilcher
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2017-12-19       Impact factor: 17.440

5.  A deep learning model for real-time mortality prediction in critically ill children.

Authors:  Soo Yeon Kim; Saehoon Kim; Joongbum Cho; Young Suh Kim; In Suk Sol; Youngchul Sung; Inhyeok Cho; Minseop Park; Haerin Jang; Yoon Hee Kim; Kyung Won Kim; Myung Hyun Sohn
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2019-08-14       Impact factor: 9.097

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.