Literature DB >> 31664776

Meta-analysis of MRI for the diagnosis of liver metastasis in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Seung Baek Hong1, Sang Hyun Choi2, Kyung Won Kim2, So Yeon Kim2, Jin Hee Kim2, Suk Kim1, Nam Kyung Lee1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Determining if a given patient with primary pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDA) has hepatic metastasis is important for treatment planning. Several previous studies reported on the diagnostic performance of MRI for liver metastasis in patients with PDA. But the reported data are quite variable.
PURPOSE: To systematically determine the diagnostic performance of MRI for liver metastasis in patients with PDA, including comparing it with computed tomography (CT). STUDY TYPE: Systemic review and meta-analysis.
SUBJECTS: In all, 457 patients from five eligible articles. FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: Conventional MR sequences with or without contrast enhancement at 1.5T and 3T. ASSESSMENT: Two reviewers independently performed the data extraction. The reviewers identified and reviewed the original articles reporting the diagnostic performance of MRI for liver metastases in patients with PDA, including those articles making comparisons with CT. STATISTICAL TESTS: Meta-analytic summary sensitivity and specificity were calculated on a per-patient basis using a bivariate random effects model. We compared the meta-analytic summary sensitivity and specificity between MRI and CT.
RESULTS: The meta-analytic summary sensitivity and specificity were 85% (95% confidence interval [CI], 74-92%; I2 = 0%) and 98% (95% CI, 78-100%; I2 = 85%), respectively. In comparison with CT, MRI showed a higher sensitivity (85% vs. 75%) but similar specificity (98% vs. 94%). DATA
CONCLUSION: MRI had good overall diagnostic performance for liver metastasis in patients with PDA, with a higher sensitivity than CT. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 Technical Efficacy: Stage 2 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2020;51:1737-1744.
© 2019 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  diagnosis; liver; magnetic resonance imaging; metastasis; pancreas

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31664776     DOI: 10.1002/jmri.26969

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 1053-1807            Impact factor:   4.813


  5 in total

1.  Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Serum AFP-L3 and GP-73 in the Diagnosis of Primary Liver Cancer.

Authors:  Jun-Jian Yuan; Yan-Dong Xu; Heng Li; Qing-Jin Guo; Guo-Ce Li; Wei Chai; Zhi-Quan Zhang; Ru-Hai Liu
Journal:  J Oncol       Date:  2022-03-30       Impact factor: 4.375

Review 2.  [Radiologic Evaluation for Resectability of Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma].

Authors:  Shin Hye Hwang; Mi-Suk Park
Journal:  Taehan Yongsang Uihakhoe Chi       Date:  2021-03-31

3.  To Investigate the Effect of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI) in the Diagnosis of Mild Craniocerebral Injury.

Authors:  Xiaoyan Lei; Dan Qin; Gangming Zhu
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2022-09-21       Impact factor: 3.246

4.  Diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced diffusion-weighted MRI for liver metastases of pancreatic cancer: towards adequate staging and follow-up of pancreatic cancer - DIA-PANC study: study protocol for an international, multicenter, diagnostic trial.

Authors:  G Litjens; D M Rivière; E J M van Geenen; S A Radema; L A A Brosens; M Prokop; C J H M van Laarhoven; J J Hermans
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2020-08-10       Impact factor: 4.430

5.  Primary pancreatic cystadenocarcinoma with ovarian metastases in a 38-year-old female: case report.

Authors:  Shun-Da Wang; Meng-Hua Dai; Yu-Pei Zhao
Journal:  Transl Cancer Res       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 1.241

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.