| Literature DB >> 31664594 |
Johannes Herzog1, Frank P Schmidt1,2, Omar Hahad1, Seyed Hamidreza Mahmoudpour3,4, Alina K Mangold1, Pascal Garcia Andreo1, Jürgen Prochaska4,5,6, Thomas Koeck5,6, Philipp S Wild4,5,6, Mette Sørensen7,8, Andreas Daiber1,6, Thomas Münzel9,10,11.
Abstract
Nocturnal train noise exposure has been associated with hypertension and myocardial infarction. It remains unclear whether acute nighttime train exposure may induce subclinical atherosclerosis, such as endothelial dysfunction and other functional and/or biochemical changes. Thus, we aimed to expose healthy subjects to nocturnal train noise and to assess endothelial function, changes in plasma protein levels and clinical parameters. In a randomized crossover study, we exposed 70 healthy volunteers to either background or two different simulated train noise scenarios in their homes during three nights. After each night, participants visited the study center for measurement of vascular function and assessment of other biomedical and biochemical parameters. The three nighttime noise scenarios were exposure to either background noise (control), 30 or 60 train noise events (Noise30 or Noise60), with average sound pressure levels of 33, 52 and 54 dB(A), respectively. Flow-mediated dilation (FMD) of the brachial artery was 11.23 ± 4.68% for control, compared to 8.71 ± 3.83% for Noise30 and 8.47 ± 3.73% for Noise60 (p < 0.001 vs. control). Sleep quality was impaired after both Noise30 and Noise60 nights (p < 0.001 vs. control). Targeted proteomic analysis showed substantial changes of plasma proteins after the Noise60 night, mainly centered on redox, pro-thrombotic and proinflammatory pathways. Exposure to simulated nocturnal train noise impaired endothelial function. The proteomic changes point toward a proinflammatory and pro-thrombotic phenotype in response to nocturnal train noise and provide a molecular basis to explain the increased cardiovascular risk observed in epidemiological noise studies.Entities:
Keywords: Environmental risk factor; Flow-mediated dilation; Oxidative stress; Pro-thrombotic state; Sleep deprivation; Systemic inflammation; Train noise exposure
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31664594 PMCID: PMC6817813 DOI: 10.1007/s00395-019-0753-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Basic Res Cardiol ISSN: 0300-8428 Impact factor: 17.165
Effects of nocturnal train noise on sleep disturbance, hemodynamic parameters, laboratory parameters, catecholamines
| Control | Noise30 | Noise60 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Peak dB(A) | 64.63 ± 8.62 | 74.9 ± 3.56 | 74.49 ± 4.02 | < 0.001 |
| 33.32 ± 4.58 | 52 ± 2.69 | 54.45 ± 2.6 | < 0.001 | |
| Sleep disturbance (VAS 0–10) | 3.6 ± 2.06 | 6.62 ± 1.8 | 7.19 ± 1.71 | < 0.001 |
| Hemodynamic parameter | ||||
| HR mean | 59.5 ± 8.1 | 58.7 ± 8.2 | 59.6 ± 8.4 | 0.377 |
| HR max | 104.6 ± 14.2 | 106.5 ± 16.8 | 107.3 ± 12.6 | 0.283 |
| HR accel index | 155.1 ± 144.2 | 177.8 ± 176.1 | 168.4 ± 146.5 | 0.843 |
| BPsyst mean | 115.3 ± 13.8 | 116.9 ± 13.5 | 114.1 ± 13.9 | 0.294 |
| BPdiast mean | 72.90 ± 11 | 74.10 ± 10.4 | 72.7 ± 10.1 | 0.475 |
| BP rise index | 31.1 ± 39.7 | 30.8 ± 31.3 | 38.8 ± 45.4 | 0.879 |
| PTTmean | 333.7 ± 19.2 | 332.5 ± 24.8 | 332.7 ± 19.8 | 0.377 |
| PTTmax | 373.2 ± 43.2 | 380 ± 19.2 | 375.3 ± 45.4 | 0.641 |
| PTTmin | 281.6 ± 26.2 | 274.1 ± 27.2 | 272.9 ± 26.5 | 0.088 |
| Laboratory parameters | ||||
| CRP (mg/l) | 2.00 ± 7.73 | 1.96 ± 7.91 | 1.13 ± 1.89 | 0.969 |
| Neutrophils (%) | 52 ± 8.7 | 52.5 ± 9.0 | 52.8 ± 8.4 | 0.626 |
| Cortisol (μg/l) | 15.46 ± 5.11 | 15.55 ± 5.4 | 15.15 ± 4.42 | 0.519 |
| Glucose (mg/dl) | 86.8 ± 6.2 | 86.5 ± 6.6 | 88 ± 6.4 | 0.058 |
| Adrenalin (pg/ml) | 25.6 ± 22.0 | 23.0 ± 18.18 | 25.9 ± 21.6 | 0.295 |
| Noradrenalin (pg/ml) | 144.4 ± 109.7 | 144.6 ± 123.3 | 157.6 ± 113.6 | 0.570 |
| Dopamine (pg/ml) | 10.07 ± 10.8 | 9.02 ± 8.8 | 10.68 ± 9.2 | 0.506 |
| 8-Isoprostan (pg/ml) | 39.1 ± 20 | 40.5 ± 22.3 | 40.1 ± 20.4 | 0.697 |
Data are presented as mean ± SD
L, dB long-term equivalent continuous sound level, PTT pulse transit time, BP blood pressure, HR accel index heart rate acceleration index
Fig. 1Effects of nighttime train noise on sleep disturbance. The Sleep Disturbance Visual Analog Scale 0–10 (VAS 0–10) was applied on control, Noise30 and Noise60 study nights. Data are mean ± SD of 70 study nights
Fig. 2Endothelial function measurement by flow-mediated dilation upon train noise exposure. FMD was determined for control, Noise30 and Noise60 study nights. Exposure to both train noise patterns impaired endothelial function, although no difference was observed between Noise30 and Noise60 study nights. Data are mean ± SD of 69 (Noise30 and Noise60) or 70 (control) individual study nights in a randomized crossover fashion. p < 0.001. Box plots indicate minimum, maximum, 25% interquartile, median and 75% interquartile
Fig. 3Determination of the effect of vitamin C on endothelial function changes by train noise exposure. FMD was determined for control, Noise30 and Noise60 study nights prior and post-administration of vitamin C, which was used as an antioxidant drug to assess the impact of noise-triggered oxidative stress on endothelial function. Vitamin C significantly improved FMD in all study groups (asterisk) being significantly stronger in nighttime railway noise-exposed study participants (dagger) p < 0.001. Box plots indicate minimum, maximum, 25% interquartile, median and 75% interquartile
Fig. 4Changes of the plasma proteome upon train noise exposure. a 92 CVD-related human protein biomarkers were measured for control and Noise60 study nights by PEA technology. Exposure to Noise60 caused substantial changes in the plasma proteome as revealed by a total of 31 significantly changed targets. Here, the 15 plasma proteins with most pronounced significant changes are shown as revealed by paired t test analysis of each target prior/post-noise exposure. STRING database protein–protein interaction analysis of proteins selected by significant changes in t test analysis is shown in suppl. Figure S2. b STRING-database protein–protein interaction analysis of proteins selected by LASSO-regularized logistic regression revealing changes in protein pathways/clusters centered on growth control, oxidative stress, cell adhesion/inflammation, protein degradation/processing as well as some non-networked proteins. Maximal number of interactions to show 1st shell: 10. The non‐networked proteins shown in this figure are sorted by strength of evidence, which is based on their consistency of selection across both LASSO‐regularized regression analyses (highest evidence) and lambda ratios. Node colors indicate cluster membership, as determined using an unsupervised three inflation parameter Markov clustering algorithm. All measured targets are shown in suppl. Table S2. A targeted proteomic analysis was performed for 22 individuals showing the greatest delta between FMD in control night and FMD after Noise60