| Literature DB >> 31664175 |
José M Menchón1, Eva Real2, Pino Alonso2, Marco Alberto Aparicio2, Cinto Segalas2, Gerard Plans2, Laura Luyten3, Els Brunfaut3, Laurean Matthijs3, Simon Raymakers3, Chris Bervoets3, Antonio Higueras4, Majed Katati4, José Guerrero4, Mariena Hurtado4, Mercedes Prieto4, Lennart H Stieglitz5, Georg Löffelholz5, Sebastian Walther5,6, Claudio Pollo5, Bartosz Zurowski7, Volker Tronnier7, Andreas Kordon8, Orsola Gambini9, Rebecca Ranieri9, Angelo Franzini10, Giuseppe Messina10, Diana Radu-Djurfeldt11, Gaston Schechtmann12, Long-Long Chen12, Renana Eitan13, Zvi Israel13, Hagai Bergman13, Tim Brelje14, Thomas C Brionne15, Aurélie Conseil15, Frans Gielen16, Michael Schuepbach5, Bart Nuttin3, Loes Gabriëls3.
Abstract
Deep brain stimulation (DBS) has been proposed for severe, chronic, treatment-refractory obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) patients. Although serious adverse events can occur, only a few studies report on the safety profile of DBS for psychiatric disorders. In a prospective, open-label, interventional multi-center study, we examined the safety and efficacy of electrical stimulation in 30 patients with DBS electrodes bilaterally implanted in the anterior limb of the internal capsule. Safety, efficacy, and functionality assessments were performed at 3, 6, and 12 months post implant. An independent Clinical Events Committee classified and coded all adverse events (AEs) according to EN ISO14155:2011. All patients experienced AEs (195 in total), with the majority of these being mild (52% of all AEs) or moderate (37%). Median time to resolution was 22 days for all AEs and the etiology with the highest AE incidence was 'programming/stimulation' (in 26 patients), followed by 'New illness, injury, condition' (13 patients) and 'pre-existing condition, worsening or exacerbation' (11 patients). Sixteen patients reported a total of 36 serious AEs (eight of them in one single patient), mainly transient anxiety and affective symptoms worsening (20 SAEs). Regarding efficacy measures, Y-BOCS reduction was 42% at 12 months and the responder rate was 60%. Improvements in GAF, CGI, and EuroQol-5D index scores were also observed. In sum, although some severe AEs occurred, most AEs were mild or moderate, transient and related to programming/stimulation and tended to resolve by adjustment of stimulation. In a severely treatment-resistant population, this open-label study supports that the potential benefits outweigh the potential risks of DBS.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31664175 PMCID: PMC7985042 DOI: 10.1038/s41380-019-0562-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mol Psychiatry ISSN: 1359-4184 Impact factor: 15.992