| Literature DB >> 31663780 |
Whitney J Cowell1, Kelly J Brunst2, Ashley J Malin1, Brent A Coull3,4, Chris Gennings1, Itai Kloog5, Lianna Lipton6, Robert O Wright1, Michelle Bosquet Enlow7,8, Rosalind J Wright1,6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The autonomic nervous system plays a key role in maintaining homeostasis and responding to external stimuli. In adults, exposure to fine particulate matter (PM2.5) has been associated with reduced heart rate variability (HRV), an indicator of cardiac autonomic control.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31663780 PMCID: PMC6867319 DOI: 10.1289/EHP4434
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Environ Health Perspect ISSN: 0091-6765 Impact factor: 9.031
Figure 1.Map of predicted levels for PRISM study participants during pregnancy. Each point represents residential () averaged across pregnancy. , fine particulate matter; PRISM, PRogramming of Intergenerational Stress Mechanisms.
Figure 2.Stylized representation of a typical response during the Repeated Still-Face Paradigm (SFP-R). The SFP-R is a 10 min, 5-episode procedure (, , , , ) that is designed to induce moderate stress in the infant via maternal disengagement and reunion. During the Play and Reunion episodes, the mother is instructed to interact with her infant, who is seated in a car seat across from her, as she normally would. During the Still-Face episodes, the mother maintains a neutral facial expression and avoids touching or vocalizing with her infant. PNS, parasympathetic nervous system; , first Reunion episode; , second Reunion episode; , respiratory sinus arrhythmia adjusted for total respiratory cycle time (); , first Still-Face episode; , second Still-Face episode.
Characteristics of mother–infant pairs enrolled in the Boston-based PRISM study () stratified by quartile of exposure during pregnancy [ or (%)].
| Characteristic | Overall ( | Q1 ( | Q2 ( | Q3 ( | Q4 ( |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prenatal | |||||
| Maternal age at enrollment (y) | |||||
| Maternal race/ethnicity | |||||
| White | 80 (34) | 32 (54) | 27 (47) | 15 (25) | 6 (10) |
| Black | 61 (26) | 15 (25) | 17 (29) | 17 (28) | 12 (20) |
| Hispanic | 77 (32) | 10 (17) | 9 (16) | 18 (30) | 40 (67) |
| Other/mixed | 19 (8) | 2 (3) | 5 (9) | 10 (17) | 2 (3) |
| Maternal high school degree | |||||
| No | 54 (23) | 9 (16) | 10 (17) | 13 (22) | 22 (37) |
| Yes | 180 (77) | 48 (84) | 48 (83) | 46 (78) | 38 (63) |
| Material hardship | |||||
| Not likely | 163 (69) | 45 (76) | 45 (78) | 37 (62) | 36 (60) |
| Somewhat likely | 48 (20) | 8 (13) | 9 (16) | 16 (27) | 15 (25) |
| Likely, very likely, or extremely likely | 26 (11) | 6 (10) | 4 (7) | 7 (12) | 9 (15) |
| Maternal Life Stressor Checklist–Revised | |||||
| Tobacco smoke exposure during pregnancy | |||||
| No | 200 (84) | 52 (88) | 48 (83) | 48 (62) | 52 (87) |
| Yes | 37 (16) | 7 (12) | 10 (17) | 12 (20) | 8 (13) |
| Tobacco smoke exposure after birth | |||||
| No | 215 (94) | 55 (98) | 52 (93) | 53 (93) | 55 (92) |
| Yes | 14 (6) | 1 (2) | 4 (7) | 4 (7) | 5 (8) |
| Infant sex | |||||
| Male | 129 (54) | 33 (56) | 31 (53) | 37 (62) | 28 (47) |
| Female | 108 (46) | 26 (44) | 27 (47) | 23 (38) | 32 (53) |
| Gestational age (weeks) | |||||
| Birthweight (kg) | |||||
| Infant alert, rested, and feeling good at SFP-R | |||||
| No | 30 (19) | 6 (13) | 4 (10) | 9 (21) | 11 (35) |
| Yes | 129 (81) | 39 (87) | 37 (90) | 33 (79) | 20 (65) |
Note: There are no missing covariate data with the exception of maternal high school degree ( missing). ETS, environmental tobacco smoke; , fine particulate matter; PRISM, Programming of Intergenerational Stress Mechanisms; Q, quartile; SFP-R, Still-Face Paradigm–Repeated.
Assessed with the Life Stressor Checklist–Revised, possible range: 0–150.
Maternal self-report of smoking or exposure to ETS for during pregnancy.
Maternal report of infant exposure to ETS for assessed at ages 2 and 6 months, .
Adjusted change [ (95% CI)] in at baseline (play) and between sequential SFP-R episodes () and for a 1-unit increase in ().
| SFP-R episode | Typical PNS response | Adjusted change in | Adjusted change in |
|---|---|---|---|
| Model 1: Play | Baseline | 16.73 (15.45, 18.11) | |
| Model 2: | Withdrawal | 0.74 ( | |
| Model 3: | Activation | 7.00 (5.40, 8.60) | 0.04 ( |
| Model 4: | Withdrawal | 0.61 ( | |
| Model 5: | Activation | 6.39 (4.26, 8.51) |
Note: The models were adjusted for infant activity, maternal race/ethnicity, maternal stress and material hardship. CI, confidence interval; , fine particulate matter; , respiratory sinus arrhythmia [in ms/mL corrected for total respiratory cycle time ()]; R, Reunion; SF, Still-Face, SFP-R, Repeated Still-Face Paradigm.
Adjusted geometric mean.
during Play is natural-log transformed; therefore, the estimate is interpreted as the percentage change in for a 1-unit increase in .
.
Sex-stratified adjusted change [ (95% CI)] in at baseline (play) and between sequential SFP-R episodes () and for a 1-unit increase in ().
| SFP-R episode | Typical PNS response | Girls ( | Boys ( | Sex | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adjusted change in | Adjusted change in | Adjusted change in | Adjusted change in | |||
| Model 1: Play | Baseline | 15.04 (13.40, 16.87) | 18.35 (16.49, 20.42) | 0.66 | ||
| Model 2: | Withdrawal | 0.88 ( | 0.77 ( | 0.90 | ||
| Model 3: | Activation | 6.36 (3.87, 8.86) | 7.33 (5.27, 9.39) | 0.67 ( | 0.30 | |
| Model 4: | Withdrawal | 1.63 ( | 0.15 ( | 0.35 | ||
| Model 5: | Activation | 7.05 (3.78, 10.33) | 5.11 (2.42, 7.80) | 0.72 ( | 0.05 | |
Note: The models were adjusted for infant activity, maternal race/ethnicity, maternal stress and material hardship. CI, confidence interval; , fine particulate matter; PNS, parasympathetic nervous system; , respiratory sinus arrhythmia [in ms/mL corrected for total respiratory cycle time ()]; R, Reunion; SF, Still-Face; SFP-R, Repeated Still-Face Paradigm.
Adjusted geometric mean.
during Play is natural-log transformed; therefore, the estimate is interpreted as the percentage change in for a 1-unit increase in .
.
.
Figure 3.Scatter plot of difference in () between sequential SFP-R episodes by () among infants enrolled in the Boston-based PRISM study (). Plotted values are residuals from linear regression models between predictors (, infant activity, race/ethnicity, maternal stress, material hardship) and added to the grand mean for each episode. The lines correspond to the estimated coefficients in Table 2 and the rug on the x-axis represents the distribution of concentrations. , fine particulate matter; PRISM, PRogramming of Intergenerational Stress Mechanisms; R, Reunion; , respiratory sinus arrhythmia [in ms/mL corrected for total respiratory cycle time ()]; SF, Still-Face; SFP-R, Repeated Still-Face Paradigm.