Literature DB >> 31663602

Participation in a Prospective Cohort Study on Melanoma did not Affect the Incidence and Mortality of the Studied Disease.

Åsa M Ingvar1, Håkan Olsson, Per Broberg, Karolin Isaksson, Christian Ingvar, Kari Nielsen.   

Abstract

Prospective observational studies have shown previously that study participants have lower morbidity and mortality than non-participants. The aim of the current study was to determine whether participants in a prospective cohort study on melanoma have a different incidence and mortality of melanoma compared with non-participants and the background population. Information was collected from Swedish National Registers on participants (n = 30,501) and non-participants (n = 10,499) in the "Melanoma In Southern Sweden" (MISS) study and the background population (n = 243,032). Hazard ratios were calculated for overall incidence of cancer and melanoma, and all-cause and melanoma-specific mortality, using Cox regression. Participants had a lower overall incidence of cancer and all-cause mortality than non-participants and the background population. There was no difference in incidence of melanoma or melanoma-specific characteristics between participants and the background population. In conclusion, participants in the MISS study have a slightly better general health, but are a representative sample of the population with regard to studies of melanoma risk factors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cohort study; incidence; malignant melanoma; mortality

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31663602      PMCID: PMC9128912          DOI: 10.2340/00015555-3362

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Derm Venereol        ISSN: 0001-5555            Impact factor:   3.875


  30 in total

1.  Lifestyle high-risk behaviors and demographics may predict the level of participation in sun-protection behaviors and skin cancer primary prevention in the United States: results of the 1998 National Health Interview Survey.

Authors:  B R Santmyire; S R Feldman; A B Fleischer
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2001-09-01       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  Non-response and related factors in a nation-wide health survey.

Authors:  K Korkeila; S Suominen; J Ahvenainen; A Ojanlatva; P Rautava; H Helenius; M Koskenvuo
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 8.082

Review 3.  The Hawthorne Effect in Infection Prevention and Epidemiology.

Authors:  Luke F Chen; Mark W Vander Weg; David A Hofmann; Heather Schacht Reisinger
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  2015-09-18       Impact factor: 3.254

4.  Total and cause specific mortality among participants and non-participants of population based health surveys: a comprehensive follow up of 54 372 Finnish men and women.

Authors:  Pekka Jousilahti; Veikko Salomaa; Kari Kuulasmaa; Matti Niemelä; Erkki Vartiainen
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 3.710

5.  Representativeness in population-based studies: a detailed description of non-response in a Danish cohort study.

Authors:  Thomas Drivsholm; Lene Falgaard Eplov; Michael Davidsen; Torben Jørgensen; Hans Ibsen; Hanne Hollnagel; Knut Borch-Johnsen
Journal:  Scand J Public Health       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 3.021

6.  Impact on mortality and cancer incidence rates of using random invitation from population registers for recruitment to trials.

Authors:  Matthew Burnell; Aleksandra Gentry-Maharaj; Andy Ryan; Sophia Apostolidou; Mariam Habib; Jatinderpal Kalsi; Steven Skates; Mahesh Parmar; Mourad W Seif; Nazar N Amso; Keith Godfrey; David Oram; Jonathan Herod; Karin Williamson; Howard Jenkins; Tim Mould; Robert Woolas; John Murdoch; Stephen Dobbs; Simon Leeson; Derek Cruickshank; Stuart Campbell; Lesley Fallowfield; Ian Jacobs; Usha Menon
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2011-03-01       Impact factor: 2.279

7.  Prospective research in health service settings: health psychology, science and the 'Hawthorne' effect.

Authors:  Ian O'Sullivan; Sheina Orbell; Tim Rakow; Ron Parker
Journal:  J Health Psychol       Date:  2004-05

8.  Low all-cause mortality in the volunteer-based Rotterdam section of the European randomised study of screening for prostate cancer: self-selection bias?

Authors:  S J Otto; F H Schröder; H J de Koning
Journal:  J Med Screen       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 2.136

9.  Mortality and cancer incidence in the EPIC-NL cohort: impact of the healthy volunteer effect.

Authors:  Ellen A Struijk; Anne M May; Joline W J Beulens; Carla H van Gils; Evelyn M Monninkhof; Yvonne T van der Schouw; Monique W M Verschuren; Jolanda M A Boer; Bas H Bueno-de-Mesquita; Petra H M Peeters
Journal:  Eur J Public Health       Date:  2014-04-15       Impact factor: 3.367

10.  Non-response in a nationwide follow-up postal survey in Finland: a register-based mortality analysis of respondents and non-respondents of the Health and Social Support (HeSSup) Study.

Authors:  Sakari Suominen; Karoliina Koskenvuo; Lauri Sillanmäki; Jussi Vahtera; Katariina Korkeila; Mika Kivimäki; Kari J Mattila; Pekka Virtanen; Markku Sumanen; Päivi Rautava; Markku Koskenvuo
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2012-03-15       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.