Melissa J Davidson1, Poul M F Nielsen1,2, Andrew J Taberner1,2, Jennifer A Kruger1,3. 1. Auckland Bioengineering Institute, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand. 2. Department of Engineering Science, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand. 3. Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Abstract
AIM: Physiotherapists typically use digital palpation to determine residual tension in a muscle, referred to as muscle stiffness or tone. These assessments are subjective, and little is known about their accuracy or repeatability. Despite this, it is standard practice to base clinical treatment on these findings. The aim of this study was to assess physiotherapists' ability to assign a seven-point palpation scale to quantitative stiffness values generated by a novel device. METHODS: Prospective observational study involving 125 musculoskeletal and pelvic floor physiotherapists. A novel device was developed that replicates the haptic feedback that clinicians assess as muscle stiffness. Measurements of displacement, force, and stiffness were recorded. RESULTS: There was wide overlap between each scale category assigned to the stiffness values, from low stiffness at -3 (119 [106, 132] N/m) to moderate stiffness at 0 (462 [435,489] N/m); to high stiffness at +3 (897 [881,913] N/m). Consistency in applying the scale was poor, and the probability of a similar value of stiffness being assigned to the same scale category by different participants was low. CONCLUSIONS: While palpation is used globally by physiotherapists as a readily available and low-cost method of assessing muscle stiffness, these results indicate that it should be used with caution in diagnosing and defining patient care. Clinical assessment of muscle stiffness requires a validated and reliable palpation scale if this metric is to be used to diagnose pathology and develop treatment protocols. Training in this scale should then be recommended to improve reliability in patient assessment.
AIM: Physiotherapists typically use digital palpation to determine residual tension in a muscle, referred to as muscle stiffness or tone. These assessments are subjective, and little is known about their accuracy or repeatability. Despite this, it is standard practice to base clinical treatment on these findings. The aim of this study was to assess physiotherapists' ability to assign a seven-point palpation scale to quantitative stiffness values generated by a novel device. METHODS: Prospective observational study involving 125 musculoskeletal and pelvic floor physiotherapists. A novel device was developed that replicates the haptic feedback that clinicians assess as muscle stiffness. Measurements of displacement, force, and stiffness were recorded. RESULTS: There was wide overlap between each scale category assigned to the stiffness values, from low stiffness at -3 (119 [106, 132] N/m) to moderate stiffness at 0 (462 [435,489] N/m); to high stiffness at +3 (897 [881,913] N/m). Consistency in applying the scale was poor, and the probability of a similar value of stiffness being assigned to the same scale category by different participants was low. CONCLUSIONS: While palpation is used globally by physiotherapists as a readily available and low-cost method of assessing muscle stiffness, these results indicate that it should be used with caution in diagnosing and defining patient care. Clinical assessment of muscle stiffness requires a validated and reliable palpation scale if this metric is to be used to diagnose pathology and develop treatment protocols. Training in this scale should then be recommended to improve reliability in patient assessment.
Authors: Daiana Priscila Rodrigues-de-Souza; Sandra Alcaraz-Clariana; Lourdes García-Luque; Cristina Carmona-Pérez; Juan Luis Garrido-Castro; Inés Cruz-Medel; Paula R Camargo; Francisco Alburquerque-Sendín Journal: Diagnostics (Basel) Date: 2021-12-09