Literature DB >> 31662803

The Open-source Data Inventory for Anthropogenic Carbon dioxide (CO2), version 2016 (ODIAC2016): A global, monthly fossil-fuel CO2 gridded emission data product for tracer transport simulations and surface flux inversions.

Tomohiro Oda1,2, Shamil Maksyutov3, Robert J Andres4.   

Abstract

The Open-source Data Inventory for Anthropogenic CO2 (ODIAC) is a global high-spatial resolution gridded emission data product that distributes carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from fossil fuel combustion. The emission spatial distributions are estimated at a 1×1 km spatial resolution over land using power plant profiles (emission intensity and geographical location) and satellite-observed nighttime lights. This paper describes the year 2016 version of the ODIAC emission data product (ODIAC2016) and presents analyses that help guiding data users, especially for atmospheric CO2 tracer transport simulations and flux inversion analysis. Since the original publication in 2011, we have made modifications to our emission modeling framework in order to deliver a comprehensive global gridded emission data product. Major changes from the 2011 publication are 1) the use of emissions estimates made by the Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center (CDIAC) at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) by fuel type (solid, liquid, gas, cement manufacturing, gas flaring and international aviation and marine bunkers), 2) the use of multiple spatial emission proxies by fuel type such as nightlight data specific to gas flaring and ship/aircraft fleet tracks and 3) the inclusion of emission temporal variations. Using global fuel consumption data, we extrapolated the CDIAC emissions estimates for the recent years and produced the ODIAC2016 emission data product that covers 2000-2015. Our emission data can be viewed as an extended version of CDIAC gridded emission data product, which should allow data users to impose global fossil fuel emissions in more comprehensive manner than original CDIAC product. Our new emission modeling framework allows us to produce future versions of ODIAC emission data product with a timely update. Such capability has become more significant given the CDIAC/ORNL's shutdown. ODIAC data product could play an important role to support carbon cycle science, especially modeling studies with space-based CO2 data collected near real time by ongoing carbon observing missions such as Japanese Greenhouse Observing SATellite (GOSAT), NASA's Orbiting Carbon Observatory 2 (OCO-2) and upcoming future missions. The ODIAC emission data product including the latest version of the ODIAC emission data (ODIAC2017, 2000-2016), is distributed from http://db.cger.nies.go.jp/dataset/ODIAC/ with a DOI.

Entities:  

Year:  2018        PMID: 31662803      PMCID: PMC6818511          DOI: 10.5194/essd-10-87-2018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Earth Syst Sci Data        ISSN: 1866-3508            Impact factor:   11.333


  8 in total

1.  Towards robust regional estimates of CO2 sources and sinks using atmospheric transport models.

Authors:  Kevin Robert Gurney; Rachel M Law; A Scott Denning; Peter J Rayner; David Baker; Philippe Bousquet; Lori Bruhwiler; Yu-Han Chen; Philippe Ciais; Songmiao Fan; Inez Y Fung; Manuel Gloor; Martin Heimann; Kaz Higuchi; Jasmin John; Takashi Maki; Shamil Maksyutov; Ken Masarie; Philippe Peylin; Michael Prather; Bernard C Pak; James Randerson; Jorge Sarmiento; Shoichi Taguchi; Taro Takahashi; Chiu-Wai Yuen
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-02-07       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Observational contrains on the global atmospheric co2 budget.

Authors:  P P Tans; I Y Fung; T Takahashi
Journal:  Science       Date:  1990-03-23       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Quantification of fossil fuel CO2 emissions on the building/street scale for a large U.S. city.

Authors:  Kevin R Gurney; Igor Razlivanov; Yang Song; Yuyu Zhou; Bedrich Benes; Michel Abdul-Massih
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2012-10-09       Impact factor: 9.028

4.  High resolution fossil fuel combustion CO2 emission fluxes for the United States.

Authors:  Kevin R Gurney; Daniel L Mendoza; Yuyu Zhou; Marc L Fischer; Chris C Miller; Sarath Geethakumar; Stephane de la Rue du Can
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2009-07-15       Impact factor: 9.028

5.  An atmospheric perspective on North American carbon dioxide exchange: CarbonTracker.

Authors:  Wouter Peters; Andrew R Jacobson; Colm Sweeney; Arlyn E Andrews; Thomas J Conway; Kenneth Masarie; John B Miller; Lori M P Bruhwiler; Gabrielle Pétron; Adam I Hirsch; Douglas E J Worthy; Guido R van der Werf; James T Randerson; Paul O Wennberg; Maarten C Krol; Pieter P Tans
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-11-27       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Increase in observed net carbon dioxide uptake by land and oceans during the past 50 years.

Authors:  A P Ballantyne; C B Alden; J B Miller; P P Tans; J W C White
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-08-02       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Holidays in lights: Tracking cultural patterns in demand for energy services.

Authors:  Miguel O Román; Eleanor C Stokes
Journal:  Earths Future       Date:  2015-06-21       Impact factor: 7.495

8.  Top-down assessment of the Asian carbon budget since the mid 1990s.

Authors:  R L Thompson; P K Patra; F Chevallier; S Maksyutov; R M Law; T Ziehn; I T van der Laan-Luijkx; W Peters; A Ganshin; R Zhuravlev; T Maki; T Nakamura; T Shirai; M Ishizawa; T Saeki; T Machida; B Poulter; J G Canadell; P Ciais
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2016-02-25       Impact factor: 14.919

  8 in total
  26 in total

1.  Gridded fossil CO2 emissions and related O2 combustion consistent with national inventories 1959-2018.

Authors:  Matthew W Jones; Robbie M Andrew; Glen P Peters; Greet Janssens-Maenhout; Anthony J De-Gol; Philippe Ciais; Prabir K Patra; Frederic Chevallier; Corinne Le Quéré
Journal:  Sci Data       Date:  2021-01-07       Impact factor: 6.444

2.  Estimating US fossil fuel CO2 emissions from measurements of 14C in atmospheric CO2.

Authors:  Sourish Basu; Scott J Lehman; John B Miller; Arlyn E Andrews; Colm Sweeney; Kevin R Gurney; Xiaomei Xu; John Southon; Pieter P Tans
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Fluxes of Atmospheric Greenhouse-Gases in Maryland (FLAGG-MD): Emissions of Carbon Dioxide in the Baltimore, MD-Washington, D.C. area.

Authors:  D Y Ahn; J R Hansford; S T Howe; X R Ren; R J Salawitch; N Zeng; M D Cohen; B Stunder; O E Salmon; P B Shepson; K R Gurney; T Oda; I Lopez-Coto; J Whetstone; R R Dickerson
Journal:  J Geophys Res Atmos       Date:  2020       Impact factor: 4.261

4.  Wintertime CO2, CH4, and CO Emissions Estimation for the Washington, DC-Baltimore Metropolitan Area Using an Inverse Modeling Technique.

Authors:  Israel Lopez-Coto; Xinrong Ren; Olivia E Salmon; Anna Karion; Paul B Shepson; Russell R Dickerson; Ariel Stein; Kuldeep Prasad; James R Whetstone
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2020-02-21       Impact factor: 9.028

5.  An Interpolation Method to Reduce the Computational Time in the Stochastic Lagrangian Particle Dispersion Modeling of Spatially Dense XCO2 Retrievals.

Authors:  Dustin Roten; Dien Wu; Benjamin Fasoli; Tomohiro Oda; John C Lin
Journal:  Earth Space Sci       Date:  2021-04-02       Impact factor: 2.900

6.  Statistical characterization of urban CO2 emission signals observed by commercial airliner measurements.

Authors:  Taku Umezawa; Hidekazu Matsueda; Tomohiro Oda; Kaz Higuchi; Yousuke Sawa; Toshinobu Machida; Yosuke Niwa; Shamil Maksyutov
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-05-14       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Using Space-Based Observations and Lagrangian Modeling to Evaluate Urban Carbon Dioxide Emissions in the Middle East.

Authors:  Emily G Yang; Eric A Kort; Dien Wu; John C Lin; Tomohiro Oda; Xinxin Ye; Thomas Lauvaux
Journal:  J Geophys Res Atmos       Date:  2020-04-04       Impact factor: 4.261

8.  Comparative assessment of net CO2 exchange across an urbanization gradient in Korea based on eddy covariance measurements.

Authors:  Je-Woo Hong; Jinkyu Hong; Junghwa Chun; Yong Hee Lee; Lim-Seok Chang; Jae-Bum Lee; Keewook Yi; Young-San Park; Young-Hwa Byun; Sangwon Joo
Journal:  Carbon Balance Manag       Date:  2019-09-11

9.  What Are the Different Measures of Mobility Telling Us About Surface Transportation CO2 Emissions During the COVID-19 Pandemic?

Authors:  Johannes Gensheimer; Alexander J Turner; Ankit Shekhar; Adrian Wenzel; Frank N Keutsch; Jia Chen
Journal:  J Geophys Res Atmos       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 4.261

10.  Description of the NASA GEOS Composition Forecast Modeling System GEOS-CF v1.0.

Authors:  Christoph A Keller; K Emma Knowland; Bryan N Duncan; Junhua Liu; Daniel C Anderson; Sampa Das; Robert A Lucchesi; Elizabeth W Lundgren; Julie M Nicely; Eric Nielsen; Lesley E Ott; Emily Saunders; Sarah A Strode; Pamela A Wales; Daniel J Jacob; Steven Pawson
Journal:  J Adv Model Earth Syst       Date:  2021-04-07       Impact factor: 6.660

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.