| Literature DB >> 31662670 |
N Thligene1, G N Mezzapesa2, D Mondelli3, A Trani2, P Veronico4, M T Melillo4, S Dumontet1, T Miano3, N Sasanelli4.
Abstract
Plant parasitic nematodes (PPN) are important pests of numerous agricultural crops especially vegetables, able to cause remarkable yield losses correlated to soil nematode population densities at sowing or transplant. The concern on environmental risks, stemming from the use of chemical pesticides acting as nematicides, compels to their replacement with more sustainable pest control strategies. To verify the effect of aqueous extracts of the agro-industry waste coffee silverskin (CS) and brewers' spent grain (BSG) on the widespread root-knot nematode Meloidogyne incognita, and on the physiology of tomato plants, a pot experiment was carried out in a glasshouse at 25 ± 2 °C. The possible phytotoxicity of CS and BSG extracts was assessed on garden cress seeds. Tomato plants (landrace of Apulia Region) were transplanted in an artificial nematode infested soil with an initial population density of 3.17 eggs and juveniles/mL soil. CS and BSG were applied at rates of 50 and 100 % (1L/pot). Untreated and Fenamiphos EC 240 (nematicide) (0.01 μL a.i./mL soil) treated plants were used as controls. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) and chlorophyll content of tomato plants were estimated during the experiment. CS extract, at both doses, significantly reduced nematode population in comparison to the untreated control, although it was less effective than Fenamiphos. BSG extract did not reduce final nematode population compared to the control. Ten days after the first treatment, CS 100 %, BSG 50 % and BSG 100% elicited the highest ROS values, which considerably affected the growth of tomato plants in comparison to the untreated plants. The control of these pests is meeting with difficulties because of the current national and international regulations in force, which are limiting the use of synthetic nematicides. Therefore, CS extracts could assume economic relevance, as alternative products to be used in sustainable strategies for nematode management.Entities:
Keywords: Meloidogyne incognita; by-products valorization; phytochemicals; sustainable nematode control; tomato
Year: 2019 PMID: 31662670 PMCID: PMC6662022 DOI: 10.2478/helm-2018-0038
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Helminthologia ISSN: 0440-6605 Impact factor: 1.184
Physical and chemical main characteristics of coffee silverskin (CS) and brewer’s spent grain (BSG) extracts.
| Parameters | Unit | BSG | CS | LSD | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.05 | 0.01 | ||||
| pH | [H+] | 6.9* ± 0.1 | 5.6 ± 0.1 | 0.13 | 0.22 |
| Electrical Conductivity | mS/cm | 4.9 ± 0.3 | 4.6 ± 0.2 | 0.57 | 0.95 |
| Total Nitrogen | g/L | 1.2 ± 0.1 | 0.7 ± 0.2 | 0.35 | 0.57 |
| Total Polyphenols | mg/L | 353 ± 15 | 403 ± 22 | 44.0 | 73.0 |
*Each value is an average of three replications ± SE
Fig. 1Phytotoxicity test. Effect of different BSG and CS aqueous extract concentrations on germination index (GI) of garden cress seeds (Lepidium sativum L.).
Fig. 2Total ions chromatograms of silverskin coffee extract (top) and brewer’s spent grain (bottom) obtained by LC-MS analysis.
Identification and quantification of compounds obtained by LC-MS/MS analysis of silver skin coffee extract (in brackets the relative abundance of each signal).
| RT | [M-H]- | MS2 | mg/L | Name * |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.44 | 191 | 85(100) 127(50) | 54.78 | QA |
| 2.23 | 353 | 135(100) 191(80) 179(10) | 3.43 | 3-CQA |
| 3.22 | 353 | 191(100) 161(5) 173(6) | 4.54 | 5-CQA |
| 3.39 | 353 | 136(100) 191(60) 94(40) 173(30) | 7.44 | 4-CQA |
| 3.56 | 367 | 135(100) 193(10) 179(5) 118(5) 94(5) | 2.26 | 3-FQA |
| 4.01 | 367 | 367(100) 269(95) 287(40) 148(20) 349(15) | 2.85 | FQA1 |
| 4.67 | 367 | 367(100) 287(40) 243(40) 349(30) | 2.02 | FQA2 |
| 6.11 | 367 | 173(100) 134(80) 94(60) 193(15) | 2.53 | 4-FQA |
| 6.27 | 367 | 191(100) 135(40) 94(35) 193(15) | 7.71 | 5-FQA |
| 6.53 | 559 | 351(100) | 0.36 | 3Si-4CQA |
| 9.87 | 381 | 358(100) 363(74) 257(48) 273(35) 319(27) 363(25) 336(23) | 4.25 | 3-DQA |
| 12.34 | 397 | 397(100) 325(20) 219(10) | 0.37 | SiQA |
*Q=quinic, F=Feruloyl, C=Caffeoyl, Si=Sinapoyl, D=Dimethoxycinnamoyl, A=Acid
Identification and quantification of compounds obtained by LC-MS/MS analysis of brewer’s spent grain extract (in brackets the relative abundance of each signal).
| RT | [M-H]- | MS2 | Structural hypothesis |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7.58 | 394 | 289(100) 333(88) 394(88) 305(82) 351(78) 271(36) 297(26) | Ca (289) |
| 7.69 | 329 | 82(100) 247(99) 96(43) 163(37) 125(36) 148(33) 81(30) 173(28) | Co(163) Q frg(173) Dq(329) |
| 8.2 | 265 | 123(100) 86(59) 175(45) 153(19) 168(16) 114(12) 106(11) | P(153) |
| 8.68 | 357 | 163(100) 233(50) 151(10) | Co(163) |
| 8.99 | 331 | 249(100) 153(32) 207(15) 234(13) 150(11) | P(153) |
| 9.01 | 271 | 146(100) 148(59) 136(46) 176(20) 120(17) 163(11) 191(11) | Co(163) Q(191) |
| 9.36 | 373 | 212(100) 283(53) 248(46) 191(43) 209(39) 194(35) | F(194) Q(191) |
| 10.73 | 375 | 312(100) 191(81) 246(52) 187(48) 176(35) 219(24) | Q(191) |
| 12.27 | 538 | 180(100) 414(59) 283(48) 206(28) 383(16) 184(11) | C(180) |
| 12.94 | 480 | 173(100) 262(73) 306(32) 231(22) 480(20) 188(16) 204(15) | Q frg(173) |
| 13.54 | 331 | 157(100) 314(74) 144(39) 153(23) 155(19) 138(18) 171(15) | P (153) |
| 13.95 | 329 | 211(100) 222(44) 173(38) 212(38) 203(37) 163(16) | Co(163) Q(173) Dq(329) |
| 15.58 | 317 | 153(100) 233(30) 112(28) 163(23) 133(19) 215(17) | Co(163) P(153) |
| 17.19 | 541 | 230(100) 117(20) 194(15) 212(10) 153(5) | F (194) P(153) |
Ca=catechin; Co=coumaric; Q=quinic; Dq=dimethylquercetin; P=protocatechuic; F=ferulic; C=caffeic; Frg=fragment.
Effects of two different concentrations of aqueous solutions of coffee silverskin (CS) and brewer's spent grain (BSG) on the growth of tomato plants (landrace of Apulia Region) infested by the root-knot nematode Meloidogyne incognita.
| Treatment | Dose (%) | Top weight | (g) | Height | (cm) | Root weight (g) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| fresh | dry | ||||||||||||
| es | 50 | 76.1*±6.7 | bc** | ABC | 9.3 ± 0.8 | bc | ABC | 88.2 ± 4.4 | ab | A | 8.7 ± 0.7 | b | AB |
| es | 100 | 80.7 ±10.9 | bcd | ABC | 9.6 ± 1.2 | bc | BC | 91.4 ±7 | b | A | 12.2 ± 0.7 | c | BC |
| BSG | 50 | 101.5 ±6.9 | d | C | 12.4 ± 0.9 | d | C | 85.6 ± 2.6 | ab | A | 18.6 ±1.5 | d | D |
| BSG | 100 | 94.4 ± 3.5 | cd | BC | 11.1 ±0.6 | cd | C | 86.8 ± 5.6 | ab | A | 13.3 ± 1.4 | c | C |
| Fenamiphos 240 EC (liquid formulation) | 0.01 soil μL a.i./cm3 | 64.3 ±11.1 | ab | AB | 7.2 ± 1.4 | ab | AB | 94.2 ± 7.5 | b | A | 4.7 ± 0.5 | a | A |
| Untreated control | -- | 52.5 ± 4.5 | a | A | 5.8 ± 0.5 | a | A | 73.8 ± 5.9 | a | A | 12.3 ± 0.9 | c | BC |
* Each value is an average of 5 replications + SE; **Data followed by the same letters in each column are not statistically different according to Least Significant Difference's Test (small letters for P= 0.05; capital letters for P= 0.01).
Effects of different concentrations of aqueous solutions of coffee silverskin (CS) and brewer's spent grain (BSG) on the root-knot nematode Meloidogyne incognita infecting tomato plants (landrace Apulia Region).
| Treatment | Dose (%) | Root gall index (0-10) | Eggs and juveniles/g root (x 1,000) | Eggs and juveniles/mL soil | Final population/mL soil (from roots and soil) | Reproduction rate | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CS | 50 | 3.8*± 0.7 | b** | B | 19.8 ± 1.3 | ab | A | 14.8 ± 1.6 | b | BC | 42.9 ± 2.8 | b | AB | 13.5 ± 0.9 | b | AB |
| CS | 100 | 4 ± ±0.3 | bc | B | 22.4 ± 1.5 | b | AB | 4.8 ± 0.7 | a | A | 52.9 ± 9.4 | b | BC | 16.7 ±1.1 | b | BC |
| BSG | 50 | 4.6 ±0.5 | bc | B | 35.2 ± 2.1 | cd | CD | 5.4 ± 1.3 | a | A | 107 ±10.9 | d | D | 33.7 ± 3.4 | d | D |
| BSG | 100 | 4.2 ±0.6 | bc | B | 29.3 ± 1.7 | c | BC | 16.8 ± 3.3 | b | C | 69.1 ±11.4 | bc | BC | C16.8 ±3.3bC6 | bc | BC |
| Fenamiphos 240 EC (liquid formulation) | 0.01 μL/ cm3 soil | 1.4 ±0.5 | a | A | 13.8 ± 2.9 | a | A | 5.8 ± 0.9 | a | A | 13.1 ±1.2 | a | A | 3.1 ±1.2aA4 | a | A |
| Untreated control | -- | 5.4 ±0.2 | c | B | 40.3 ± 3.5 | d | D | 8.2 ± 1.8 | a | AB | 82.2 ±13.6 | cd | CD | 25.9 ± 4.3 | cd | CD |
* Each value is an average of 5 replications + SE; **Data followed by the same letters in each column are not statistically different according to Least Significant Difference's Test (small letters for P= 0.05; capital letters for P= 0.01).
Effect of coffee silverskin (CS) and brewer’s spent grain (BSG) extracts soil treatments, at two concentrations (50 and 100%), on plant growth and reactive oxygen species (ROS) accumulation in tomato roots (landrace Apulia Region).
| Treatment | Dose | 5 days after 1st treatment | 10 days after 1st treatment | 5 days after 2nd treatment | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (%) | ROS content | Plant weight (g) | ROS content | Plant weight (g) | ROS content | Plant weight (g) | |
| 3,482 ± 125 | 4.96 ± 1.38 | 3,738 ± 69** | 6.45 ± 0.86* | 3,682 ± 77 | 30.83 ± 2.63 | ||
| 3,725 ± 71 | 3.37 ± 0.79 | 3,840 ± 50** | 5.36 ± 1.05* | 2,999 ± 82 | 28.97 ± 1.31 | ||
| 3,444 ± 127 | 4.57 ± 0.82 | 3,325 ± 129 | 7.91 ± 1.44 | 3,392 ± 157 | 26.89 ± 2.04 | ||
| 3,777 ± 165 | 4.11 ± 1.08 | 3,764 ± 130** | 6.42 ± 1.18* | 4,681 ± 139** | 29.93 ± 0.49 | ||
| 3,3721 ± 182 | 4.91 ± 0.94 | 3,131 ± 148 | 11.00 ± 0.93 | 3,360 ± 203 | 27.13 ± 3.06 | ||
Each value is an average of fluorescence units (FSU 50 mg-1 root fresh weight) of two experiments each containing six replications ± SE; Asterisks indicate statistically significant difference in comparison to the untreated control according to Student’s t-test (* for P≤0.05, ** for P≤0.01).
Effect of different concentrations of coffee silverskin (CS) and brewer’s spent grain (BSG) aqueous extracts on chlorophyll content (Chl) of leaves of treated or untreated (control) tomato plants (landrace of Apulia Region) at 5, 10 and 25 days after treatments.
| 15/11/2017 (5 days – after the first treatment) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment | Dose (%) | Chl | Chl | Chl tot. (μg/cm2) | |||
| 27.6* ± 1.7 | a** | 7 ± 1.6 | a | 34.6 ± 3.2 | a | ||
| 26.7 ± 4 | a | 7.3 ± 1.1 | a | 34.1 ± 5.1 | a | ||
| 28.9 ± 2.7 | a | 8.1 ± 0.7 | a | 37 ± 3.4 | a | ||
| 26.7 ± 2.9 | a | 7.7 ± 1.2 | a | 34.3 ± 4 | a | ||
| 28.1± 1.3 | a | 7.9 ± 0.4 | a | 36.1 ± 1.7 | a | ||
Each value is an average of 3 replications ±SE;** Data followed in each column by the same letter are not significantly different according to Least Significant Difference’s Test (LSD’s Test) (P≤0.05).