Literature DB >> 31662663

Soil Nematode Abundances were Increased by an Incremental Nutrient Input in a Paddy-upland Rotation System.

C Hu1, X G Xia1, X M Han2,3, Y F Chen1, Y Qiao1, D H Liu1, S L Li1.   

Abstract

To study the effect of fertilization on soil nematode communities in a paddy-upland rotation system, an ongoing thirty-three years long-term fertilizer experiment is conducted which includes seven treatments; an unfertilized treatment (control), nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), potassium (K) fertilizer treatments (N, NP, NPK) and organic manure (M) combined with chemical fertilizer treatments (MN, MNP, and MNPK). The soil nematode community structure and crop yields were determined in 2012 and 2013. Overall total nematode abundance was increased by an incremental nutrient input both in the rice and wheat fields. Total number of nematode was 1.25 - 2.37 times greater in the rice field and was 1.08 - 2.97 times greater in wheat field in the fertilization treatments than in the unfertilized treatment. Soil free-living nematode abundances was significantly (P < 0.001) increased in organic manure combined with chemical fertilizer treatments in rice field. Fungi-feeders and plant-feeding nematodes abundances were not significantly different among treatments in rice and wheat fields. Omnivorous and predatory nematodes were the most dominant groups in the present study. Omnivores, predators and Prodorylaimus abundances were significantly (P < 0.05) higher in organic manure combined with NPK fertilizer treatments than in chemical fertilizer alone and unfertilized treatments both in rice and wheat fields. Stepwise regressions revealed that soil free-living nematodes were significant predictors of rice grain yields (R 2 = 0.56, P < 0.001) and omnivorous and predatory nematodes were significant predictors of the wheat grain yield (R 2 = 0.89, P < 0.001). Therefore, long-term application of organic manure combined with chemical fertilizer could increase nematode abundances and crop yields. Organic manure combined with chemical fertilizer application was recommended in agricultural ecosystem.
© 2018 C. Hu, X. G. Xia, X. M. Han, Y. F. Chen, Y. Qiao, D. H. Liu, S. L. Li, published by Sciendo.

Entities:  

Keywords:  crop yields; long-term fertilizer experiment; prodorylaimus; soil nematode community; trophic group

Year:  2018        PMID: 31662663      PMCID: PMC6662006          DOI: 10.2478/helm-2018-0025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Helminthologia        ISSN: 0440-6605            Impact factor:   1.184


Introduction

Maintaining sustainable soil utilization in developing countries is essential to supply the demand for food grain production. However, steady crop yields cannot be maintained without the application of some soil amendments (Gruzdeva ). Long-term and large numbers of chemical fertilizer applications have led to the loss of soil fertility, a reduction in soil biodiversity, and polluted farm products (Singh et al., 2016; Ding ). Therefore, the application of organic fertilizer has come under consideration. The benefits of long-term manure application to soil include better tilth, improved water-holding capacity and cation exchange capacity, moderated soil temperature, enhanced crop performance, and increased soil organic matter and biological fertility (McSorley & Gallaher, 1997). Accordingly, soil fertility and crop yields are increased and good physical or chemical soil properties and biological communities are maintained. However, the long-term application of chemical fertilizers leads to soil hardening, weak aeration, and weak biological activity (Hopkins & Shiel, 1996). Paddy rice-upland wheat crop rotation systems are one of the largest agricultural production systems in the world, mainly distributed in southern and eastern Asia (Brar ). The 13.5 million hectares were in South Asia, and the other 10.5 million hectares are in South China, widely disseminated throughout the provinces of Jiangsu, Zhejiang, Hubei, Guizhou, Yunnan, Sichuan and Anhui, etc. (Hu ). This area accounts for roughly half of the total rice cultivated area in China. Therefore, the protection of the soil environment in the rice-wheat crop system is crucial for the maintenance of sustainable crop yields and to ensure China’s food security (Zhang ). Long-term field experiments are indispensable sources of knowledge and provide a tool for examining soil environment changes (Debreczeni & Körschens, 2003). Furthermore, long-term fertilizer experiments could reflect the influence of fertilizer benefit, crop growth and soil environment due to annual changes in climate (Miao ; Wei ). Some information could be gained regarding sustainable agriculture and humanity’s influence on the soil fertility, landscape and agricultural environment (Diacono & Montemurro, 2010; Miles & Brown, 2011; Peterson ; Geisseler & Scow, 2014). Soil free-living nematode communities are known to be sensitive to agricultural management practices such as fertilization, irrigation, and tillage (Porazinska ; Zhang ). Furthermore, soil nematodes can be placed into at least five functional or trophic groups. They occupy a central position in the soil detrital food web and play a crucial role in soil organic-matter decomposition, plant-nutrient mineralization, and nutrient cycling (Neher, 2001). Therefore, soil nematode diversity, species composition, trophic group, and biomass may be useful bioindicators for monitoring soil environmental changes (Gutiérrez et al., 2016; Scharroba ; Zhao ; Čerevková et al., 2017). Liang reported that total nematode abundance responded positively to manure treatments in monoculture maize fields. Hu & Qi (2013) found that long-term application of micro-organic compost could increase nematode abundance in wheat fields. So far, all studies about the effects of fertilization on the nematode community have mainly focused on the upland cropping systems. However, few investigations have reported the effects of long-term application of inorganic and organic fertilizer on soil nematode communities in the paddy-upland rotation system. Therefore, the aims of this study are to (1) determine the impacts of long-term fertilization on the soil nematode community, (2) compare the differences of the nematode communities under organic manure and inorganic fertilizer treatments in the paddy rice-upland wheat rotation systems.

Materials and Methods

Study site

An ongoing long-term (thirty-three years) fertilizer experiment in a rice-wheat rotation system was initiated from rice cultivation in 1981, belonging to the National Fertilizer Experiment Monitoring Network at Nanhu Experimental Station, Hubei Academy of Agricultural Sciences in Wuchang China, located at latitude 30°28′N, longitude 114°25′E and at an altitude of 20 meters in central China. The experimental site lies in a subtropical monsoon zone, which is characterized by hot summers and severe winters, and occasional snowfall during winter. The mean annual temperature is 13 °C, ranging from a minimum of 3.7 °C in January to a maximum of 28.8 °C in July. The mean annual precipitation is 1300 mm, and the annual non-frost period is 240 days from 1981 to 2013. The soil at the experimental site is yellow-brown soil, belonging to the Albic Luvisol in the FAO classification, which has a clay-loam texture with 15 % sand, 36 % silt, and 49 % clay. Soil physical-chemical properties in October 2012 at an 0 – 20 cm depth were shown in Table 1.
Table 1

Soil properties (0–20 cm) in different fertilization treatments in October 2012.

TreatmentOrganic MatterTotal NAlkaline NAvailable PAvailable KpH
(g kg-1)(g kg-1)(mg kg-1)(mg kg-1)(mg kg-1)
Control21.69c1.64c112.22b8.21c105.63bc7.17ab
N22.02c1.79bc113.88b8.71c94.77bc7.37ab
NP26.02b1.86bc129.51b18.71c93.12c7.57a
NPK26.54b1.88b134.35b18.33c117.66bc7.22ab
MN36.74a2.71a188.98a130.69b139.14bc7.22ab
MNP34.72a2.61a173.51a136.73b141.27b7.30ab
MNPK34.04a2.70a189.01a151.32a205.94a7.03b

Control, the unfertilized treatment; N, the inorganic nitrogen fertilizer treatment; NP, the inorganic nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizer treatment; NPK, the inorganic nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium fertilizer treatment; MN, the manure plus inorganic nitrogen fertilizer treatment; MNP, the manure plus inorganic nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizer treatment; MNPK, the manure plus inorganic nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium fertilizer treatment.

Different letters (a, b, c) in the same column indicate significant differences (P < 0.05) among treatments according to LSD multiple comparison.

Soil properties (0–20 cm) in different fertilization treatments in October 2012. Control, the unfertilized treatment; N, the inorganic nitrogen fertilizer treatment; NP, the inorganic nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizer treatment; NPK, the inorganic nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium fertilizer treatment; MN, the manure plus inorganic nitrogen fertilizer treatment; MNP, the manure plus inorganic nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizer treatment; MNPK, the manure plus inorganic nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium fertilizer treatment. Different letters (a, b, c) in the same column indicate significant differences (P < 0.05) among treatments according to LSD multiple comparison.

Experimental design

The field experiment was constituted of seven treatments and three replicates in a randomized complete block design. Each plot was 40 m2 (5 m width × 8 m length). The seven treatments were as follows: (1) the unfertilized treatment, control; (2) the inorganic N fertilizer treatment, N; (3) the inorganic N and P fertilizer treatment, NP; (4) the inorganic N, P and K fertilizer treatment, NPK; (5) the manure plus inorganic N fertilizer treatment, MN; (6) the manure plus inorganic N and P fertilizer treatment, MNP; and (7) the manure plus inorganic N, P and K fertilizer treatment, MNPK. The chemical fertilizers were applied at an annual rate of 150 kg N ha-1, 75 kg P2O5 ha-1, and 150 kg K2O ha-1 (Zhang et al., 2017b). The N, P, and K fertilizers were applied as urea, ammonium phosphate, and potassium chloride, respectively. 22,500 kg ha-1 of organic fertilizers from pig dung compost was applied to the MN, MNP and MNPK treatments. The pig dung compost contained an average of 282.05 g kg−1 organic C, 15.08 g kg−1 total N, 20.84 g kg−1 P2O5, 13.56 g kg−1 K2O, and 69 % water. 60 % of inorganic fertilizers were applied during the rice growth season and the other 40 % during the wheat growth season, while manure was applied equally (50:50) to the two crops. The N fertilizer was applied three times in the rice growth season. Namely, 40 % of the N fertilizer as basal fertilizer was applied before the cultivating rice, 40 % was applied during the rice tillering stage and 20 % was applied during the rice booting stage. Similarly, the N fertilizer was also applied three times in the wheat growth season. Namely, 50 % of N fertilizer as basal fertilizer was applied before the planting wheat, 25 % during the wheat seedling stage and 25 % was applied during the jointing stage in the wheat growth season. Every year, the P, K fertilizers and manure were applied as basal fertilizer, prior to plough. All basal fertilizers and manure were evenly sprinkled on the soil surface by hand and were incorporated into the plough layer by tillage as soon as possible. Tillage was performed to a depth of 20 cm by a plough, followed by a harrow. The fertilized and unfertilized plots were tilled similarly. All plots were transplanted with rice seedlings (Oryza sativa L.) in summer and were sown with wheat seeds (Triticum aestivum L.) in winter, which has been done annually since 1981. The rice was transpl anted in June and harvested in October, and the wheat was directly sown in November and harvested in May of the next year. The above-ground crops were harvested with a sickle and removed; thus, no straw returned into the soil in any plot. Nevertheless, rice o r wheat stubble and roots were incorporated into the soil with a plow before the subsequent rice or wheat planting. In addition to the fertilizer treatments, all other agronomic managements were identical in the fertilized and unfertilized plots. Rice and wheat grains were separated from straws using a plot thresher. Grains and straw were weighed after sun-drying and recorded from the whole plot.

Soil sampling

Soil samples from the upper (0 – 20 cm) soil layer were collected in the rice and wheat maturity stages in October 2012 and in May 2013, respectively. Composite soil samples consisting of ten cores (2.5 cm diameter × 20 cm depth) were collected from each plot. Soil samples were stored in tied and insulated plastic bags to prevent moisture loss. They were transferred to 4 °C storage as soon as possible until they were used to analyze the soil nematode community structure.

Soil physical-chemical properties analysis

Soil samples collected from the 0 – 20 cm were air-dried at room temperature, mixed, sieved through a 1-mm screen, and sub-samples were used to analyze soil physical-chemical properties. The air-dried sub-samples were ground to pass through a 0.25-mm sieve to determine soil organic matter and total N contents. The potassium dichromate external heating method was used to determine soil organic matter content (Blakemore ). The Kjeldahl method and the alkaline-hydrolysable diffusion method were used to determine total N and alkaline-hydrolysable N content (Bremner, 1996). Soil available P was extracted with 0.5 mol L-1 NaHCO3 (soil: solution=1:20) and measured with the Olsen method (Olsen ). Soil available K was extracted with 1 mol L-1 NH4Ac (soil: solution=1:10) and measured with the flame photometry method (Carson, 1980). Soil pH was measured with 0.01 mol L-1 CaCl2 slurry (soil: solution=1:2.5) using a glass electrode (Lu, 1999).

Nematode analysis

Field moist subsamples (100 g) of each sample were used to extract nematodes with the sugar flotation and centrifugation method (Barker ). The nematode populations were expressed as 100 g-1 dry soil. After counting the total number of nematodes using an anatomical lens, two hundred nematodes per sample were randomly selected and identified to genus according to esophageal and morphology characteristics using an inverted compound microscope (Mal & Lyon, 1975; Ying, 1998). The characteristics of the nematode communities were described using the following approaches: (1) total number of nematodes per 100 g dry soil; (2) the number of soil free-living nematodes per 100 g dry soil; (3) trophic groups: (a) bacterial feeders; (b) fungal feeders; (c) plant feeders; and (d) omnivore-predators (Yeates et al. 1993).

Statistical analysis

One-way variance analysis (one-way ANOVA) was used to detect differences between different treatments. Differences at the P < 0.05 level were considered statistically significant under the least significant difference (LSD) test. All statistical analyses and the stepwise regression were performed using SPSS 18.0 version software package.

Ethical Approval and/or Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals by any of the authors.

Results

Soil physical-chemical properties

Soil organic matter, total N, alkaline-hydrolysable N and available P content were significantly (F = 82.892, P < 0.001 in soil organic matter; F = 39.068, P < 0.001 in soil total N; F = 18.383, P < 0.001 in alkaline-hydrolysable N; F = 224.353, P < 0.001 in available P) higher in the manure combined with chemical fertilizer treatment than in the chemical fertilizer alone and unfertilized treatment. Soil available K content were significantly (F = 6.443, P = 0.002) higher in the manure combined with NPK fertilizer treatment than in the other fertilization treatments and unfertilized control (Table 1).

Total nematode abundance

Total number of nematodes had an increasing tendency with soil nutrient input increments in rice and wheat fields (Fig. 1). Total numbe r of nematode was 1.25 – 2.37 times greater in rice field and was 1.08 – 2.97 times greater in wheat field in the fertilization treatments than in the unfertilized treatment. In particular, the increase was significant in the NPK and manure combined with the chemical fertilizer treatments (F = 31.452, P < 0.001 in rice field; F = 5.253, P = 0.005 in wheat field).
Fig. 1

Total nematode abundance after different fertilization treatments in the rice field (A) and wheat field (B). Control, the unfertilized treatment; N, the inorganic nitrogen fertilizer treatment; NP, the inorganic nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizer treatment; NPK, the inorganic nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium fertilizer treatment; MN, the manure plus inorganic nitrogen fertilizer treatment; MNP, the manure plus inorganic nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizer treatment; MNPK, the manure plus inorganic nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium fertilizer treatment. Data are means ± SD (n = 3). Different letters (a, b, c) above the column indicate significant differences (P < 0.05) among treatments according to LSD multiple comparison.

Total nematode abundance after different fertilization treatments in the rice field (A) and wheat field (B). Control, the unfertilized treatment; N, the inorganic nitrogen fertilizer treatment; NP, the inorganic nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizer treatment; NPK, the inorganic nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium fertilizer treatment; MN, the manure plus inorganic nitrogen fertilizer treatment; MNP, the manure plus inorganic nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizer treatment; MNPK, the manure plus inorganic nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium fertilizer treatment. Data are means ± SD (n = 3). Different letters (a, b, c) above the column indicate significant differences (P < 0.05) among treatments according to LSD multiple comparison.

Nematode trophic group abundance

Like the total number of nematodes, the number of soil free- living nematodes (bacterial-feeders + fungal-feeders + omnivores + predators) had an increasing tendency with soil nutrient input increments in rice and wheat fields. In particular, the increase was significant (F = 41.455, P < 0.001) in the manure combined with chemical fertilizer treatments in rice field. Moreover, the number of soil free-living nematodes were significantly (F = 9.890, P = 0.005) higher in the NPK treatment than in the NP, N and unfertilized treatments under the rice field (Table 2).
Table 2

The number of soil nematodes (individuals 100 g-1 dry soil) after different fertilization treatments in rice and wheat fields.

TreatmentFNBFFFPFOPProdorylaimus
RiceControl262.8d71.9a6.9a110.7a184.1d82.3d
fieldN270.2d75.2a8.4a195.2a186.6d93.6d
NP339.0d104.9a11.6a181.4a222.5d128.7cd
NPK477.2c141.2a6.0a173.7a330.0c197.6c
MN619.1b113.2a7.2a151.7a498.7b446.8b
MNP704.1ab66.0a5.2a117.0a633.0a561.0a
MNPK772.2a129.5a5.9a111.7a636.7a588.7a
WheatControl470.2c65.9bc10.0a210.8a394.3c178.6d
fieldN562.2c89.0bc2.5a173.9a470.7c170.0d
NP578.6c134.0ab0.0a213.0a444.7c176.5d
NPK942.8bc195.2a11.2a202.2a736.3bc499.7cd
MN1238.2b162.1a0.0a232.4a1076.1b971.3bc
MNP1293.0b58.8c3.9a195.2a1230.2ab1103.3ab
MNPK1907.2a195. 6a4.0a115.9a1707.6a1591.2a

FN: the number of free-living nematodes in soil; BF: bacterial feeders; FF: fungal feeders; PF: plant feeders; OP: omnivores and predators. Control, the unfertilized treatment; N, the inorganic nitrogen fertilizer treatment; NP, the inorganic nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizer treatment; NPK, the inorganic nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium fertilizer treatment; MN, the manure plus inorganic nitrogen fertilizer treatment; MNP, the manure plus inorganic nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizer treatment; MNPK, the manure plus inorganic nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium fertilizer treatment.

Different letters (a, b, c) in the same column indicate significant differences (P < 0.05) among treatments at the same sampling times according to LSD multiple comparison.

The number of soil nematodes (individuals 100 g-1 dry soil) after different fertilization treatments in rice and wheat fields. FN: the number of free-living nematodes in soil; BF: bacterial feeders; FF: fungal feeders; PF: plant feeders; OP: omnivores and predators. Control, the unfertilized treatment; N, the inorganic nitrogen fertilizer treatment; NP, the inorganic nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizer treatment; NPK, the inorganic nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium fertilizer treatment; MN, the manure plus inorganic nitrogen fertilizer treatment; MNP, the manure plus inorganic nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizer treatment; MNPK, the manure plus inorganic nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium fertilizer treatment. Different letters (a, b, c) in the same column indicate significant differences (P < 0.05) among treatments at the same sampling times according to LSD multiple comparison. The bacteria-feeding nematode abundance was not significantly different among treatments in rice field; however, the bacteria-feeding nematode abundances were significantly (F = 6.000, P = 0.003) higher in the MNPK, MN, NPK treatments than in the MNP, N and unfertilized treatments in wheat field (Table 2). The fungi-feeding nematode were the least abundant trophic group in this study. Plant-feeding nematodes were the second-most dominant trophic groups. The number of fungi-feeding and plant-feeding nematodes were not significantly different among treatments in rice and wheat fields. The omnivorous and predatory nematodes were the most dominant groups in the present study (Table 2). The number of omnivore-predators was 1.01 – 3.46 times greater in rice field and was 1.19 – 4.33 times greater in wheat field in the fertilization treatments than in the unfertilized treatment. In particular, omnivore and predator abundances were significantly (F = 58.636, P < 0.001) higher in the manure combined with the chemical fertilizer treatments than in the chemical fertilizer alone and the unfertilized treatments in rice field. Omnivore and predator abundances were significantly (F = 5.553, P = 0.013) higher in the MNPK treatment than in the chemical fertilizer alone and unfertilized treatments in wheat field. Omnivore and predator abundances were significantly (F = 9.640, P = 0.005) higher in the NPK treatment than in the NP, N and unfertilized treatments in rice field. A total of 39 nematode taxa were identified in the present study, of which 11 were bacterial feeders, 5 were fungal feeders, 6 were plant feeders, 12 were omnivores and 5 were predators (Table 3, 4). The number of Prodorylamus were significantly (F = 46.0201, P < 0.05) higher in the manure combined with the chemical fertilizer treatment than in the chemical fertilizer alone and the unfertilized treatments in rice field (Table 2).
Table 3

The number of soil nematode taxa (individuals 100 g-1 dry soil) for each treatment in rice field.

GenusGuildControlNNPNPKMNMNPMNPK
ProtorhabditisBa10.00.01.90.00.00.00.0
RhabditisBa10.00.00.00.00.00.03.1
PanagrolaimusBa11.33.33.74.07.32.642.4
CephalobusBa24.26.61.90.00.02.60.0
EucephalobusBa23.71.73.44.84.82.66.3
AcrobeloidesBa23.33.80.00.09.60.03.1
MonhysteraBa20.00.00.01.92.40.00.0
PlectusBa23.86.78.717.524.826.613.7
PrismatolaimusBa34.64.610.030.614.710.630.8
PseudoaulolaimusBa348.944.273.580.339.818.224.7
AmphidelusBa42.04.21.92.09.82.75.2
AphelenchoidesFu20.00.01.90.07.25.25.9
TylencholaimusFu42.50.01.90.00.00.00.0
DorylliumFu43.18.47.86.00.00.00.0
LeptonchusFu41.30.00.00.00.00.00.0
MalenchusH220.814.920.14.312.55.40.0
BasiriaH243.5126.496.598.935.348.039.2
PsilenchusH222.922.522.34.84.80.00.0
TylenchorhynchusH30.00.00.00.032.513.411.1
HirschmanniellaH322.124.833.356.066.650.261.4
BelondiraH51.46.69.39.70.00.00.0
PristionchusOm10.00.00.00.04.82.65.6
LordellonemaOm40.00.00.00.00.05.40.0
ProdorylaimusOm482.393.6128.7197.6446.8561.0588.7
MesodorylaimusOm426.518.421.145.62.45.36.3
EudorylaimusOm413.912.10.014.215.015.93.1
ThorneellaOm41.40.00.00.00.00.00.0
PungentusOm42.51.30.00.00.02.70.0
AporcelaimusOm57.14.73.42.022.413.55.4
SectonemaOm51.30.00.02.40.00.00.0
TripylaCa30.00.00.02.40.00.00.0
IotonchusCa40.00.00.00.00.02.75.4
MylonchulusCa40.01.33.12.02.68.010.9
LaevidesCa549.155.266.163.74.815.911.3

Functional guild classifications are made based on the feeding habits and life-cycle characteristics (Ba: bacterivores, Fu: fungivores, Ca: Carnivores, Om: omnivores, H: herbivores) (Yeates, 1993). Suffix numbers are c-p values for the taxon (Bongers & Bongers, 1998). Control, the unfertilized treatment; N, the inorganic nitrogen fertilizer treatment; NP, the inorganic nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizer treatment; NPK, the inorganic nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium fertilizer treatment; MN, the manure plus inorganic nitrogen fertilizer treatment; MNP, the manure plus inorganic nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizer treatment; MNPK, the manure plus inorganic nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium fertilizer treatment.

Table 4

The number of soil nematode taxa (individuals 100 g-1 dry soil) for each treatment in wheat field.

GenusGuildControlNNPNPKMNMNPMNPK
ProtorhabditisBa10.04.80.00.00.00.00.0
RhabditisBa10.00.02.60.00.00.00.0
PanagrolaimusBa10.011.810.57.823.34.04.0
CephalobusBa22.72.32.76.24.00.00.0
EucephalobusBa20.00.00.00.04.04.00.0
AcrobeloidesBa20.04.82.60.04.00.00.0
MonhysteraBa24.70.02.53.20.00.013.9
PlectusBa20.014.728.369.830.722.293.9
PrismatolaimusBa39.721.156.532.647.315.754.9
PseudoaulolaimusBa348.929.428.372.549.113.028.8
AmphidelusBa40.00.00.03.20.00.00.0
AphelenchoidesFu22.30.00.00.00.00.00.0
DitylenchusFu20.00.00.00.00.03.90.0
TylencholaimusFu40.00.00.04.80.00.00.0
DorylliumFu47.72.50.06.40.00.04.0
MalenchusH20.02.35.114.70.00.00.0
BasiriaH2136.4115.7105.275.4106.176.636.9
PsilenchusH25.27.323.012.65.70.00.0
TylenchorhynchusH32.70.00.00.034.258.318.1
HirschmanniellaH366.543.877.088.886.460.360.9
BelondiraH50.04.92.710.70.00.00.0
PristionchusOm16.416.912.83.27.911.813.9
CoomansinemaOm40.00.02.70.04.04.00.0
EcumenicusOm42.30.00.00.00.00.00.0
ProdorylaimusOm4178.6170.0176.5499.7971.31103.31591.2
MesodorylaimusOm457.879.765.063.413.623.418.1
EudorylaimusOm46.40.02.50.00.07.926.7
ThorneellaOm47.30.00.00.00.00.00.0
PungentusOm413.512.315.36.40.07.90.0
AporcelaimusOm510.57.42.734.524.118.333.9
LabronemaOm40.07.30.00.00.07.90.0
SectonemaOm55.04.85.10.00.00.00.0
TripylaCa32.30.010.59.68.83.95.9
MiconchusCa48.09.712.624.19.716.94.0
IotonchusCa42.39.70.00.09.610.40.0
LaevidesCa593.7152.9139.195.527.214.313.9

Functional guild classifications are made based on the feeding habits and life-cycle characteristics (Ba: bacterivores, Fu: fungivores, Ca: carnivores (predators), Om: omnivores, H, plant feeders (herbivores) (Yeates, 1993). Suffix numbers are c-p values for the taxon (Bongers & Bongers, 1998). Control, the unfertilized treatment; N, the inorganic nitrogen fertilizer treatment; NP, the inorganic nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizer treatment; NPK, the inorganic nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium fertilizer treatment; MN, the manure plus inorganic nitrogen fertilizer treatment; MNP, the manure plus inorganic nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizer treatment; MNPK, the manure plus inorganic nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium fertilizer treatment.

The number of soil nematode taxa (individuals 100 g-1 dry soil) for each treatment in rice field. Functional guild classifications are made based on the feeding habits and life-cycle characteristics (Ba: bacterivores, Fu: fungivores, Ca: Carnivores, Om: omnivores, H: herbivores) (Yeates, 1993). Suffix numbers are c-p values for the taxon (Bongers & Bongers, 1998). Control, the unfertilized treatment; N, the inorganic nitrogen fertilizer treatment; NP, the inorganic nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizer treatment; NPK, the inorganic nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium fertilizer treatment; MN, the manure plus inorganic nitrogen fertilizer treatment; MNP, the manure plus inorganic nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizer treatment; MNPK, the manure plus inorganic nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium fertilizer treatment. The number of soil nematode taxa (individuals 100 g-1 dry soil) for each treatment in wheat field. Functional guild classifications are made based on the feeding habits and life-cycle characteristics (Ba: bacterivores, Fu: fungivores, Ca: carnivores (predators), Om: omnivores, H, plant feeders (herbivores) (Yeates, 1993). Suffix numbers are c-p values for the taxon (Bongers & Bongers, 1998). Control, the unfertilized treatment; N, the inorganic nitrogen fertilizer treatment; NP, the inorganic nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizer treatment; NPK, the inorganic nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium fertilizer treatment; MN, the manure plus inorganic nitrogen fertilizer treatment; MNP, the manure plus inorganic nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizer treatment; MNPK, the manure plus inorganic nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium fertilizer treatment.

Crop yield

Rice and wheat yields were significantly (F = 3.764, P = 0.019 in rice; F = 91.648, P < 0.001 in wheat) influenced by the different fertilization treatments (Table 5). Rice grain yields were 1.23 – 1.73 times greater in the fertilization treatments than in the unfertilized treatment. In particular, rice grain yields were significantly (F = 5.265, P = 0.015) higher in the MNPK treatment than in the chemical fertilizer alone and the unfertilized treatments. Rice grain yields were significantly (F = 5.415, P = 0.014) higher in the MNPK, MNP, MN treatments than in the N and unfertilized treatments; nevertheless, there were no significant differences between the N and unfertilized treatments.
Table 5

Crop grain yields after different fertilization treatments.

TreatmentRice grain yield (t/ha)Wheat grain yield (t/ha)
Control3.79d2.24c
N4.66cd2.32c
NP5.13bc3.13b
NPK5.17bc3.23b
MN6.04ab4.56a
MNP6.10ab4.65a
MNPK6.55a4.74a

Control, the unfertilized treatment; N, the inorganic nitrogen fertilizer treatment; NP, the inorganic nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizer treatment; NPK, the inorganic nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium fertilizer treatment; MN, the manure plus inorganic nitrogen fertilizer treatment; MNP, the manure plus inorganic nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizer treatment; MNPK, the manure plus inorganic nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium fertilizer treatment.

Different letters (a, b, c) in the same column indicate significant differences (P < 0.05) among treatments according to LSD multiple comparison.

Crop grain yields after different fertilization treatments. Control, the unfertilized treatment; N, the inorganic nitrogen fertilizer treatment; NP, the inorganic nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizer treatment; NPK, the inorganic nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium fertilizer treatment; MN, the manure plus inorganic nitrogen fertilizer treatment; MNP, the manure plus inorganic nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizer treatment; MNPK, the manure plus inorganic nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium fertilizer treatment. Different letters (a, b, c) in the same column indicate significant differences (P < 0.05) among treatments according to LSD multiple comparison. Wheat grain yields were 1.04 – 2.12 times greater in the fertilization treatments than in the unfertilized treatment. Wheat grain yields were significantly (F = 91.648, P < 0.001) higher in the manure combined with the chemical fertilizer treatments than in the chemical fertilizer alone and in the unfertilized treatments. Moreover, wheat grain were significantly (F = 19.641, P < 0.001) higher in the NPK, NP treatments than in the N alone and in the unfertilized treatments; nevertheless, there was no significant difference between the N alone and the unfertilized treatments.

Regression analysis

Stepwise regression equations were conducted to evaluate soil nematode community parameters in rice and wheat fields. These parameters were significantly associated with rice and wheat grain yields. The number of soil free-living nematode was found to be a significant (F = 23.968, P < 0.001) predictor of rice grain yields. The number of omnivorous and predatory nematodes was found to be a significant (F = 150.214, P < 0.001) predictor of wheat grain yields (Table 6).
Table 6

Stepwise regression of grain yields of rice and wheat with the soil nematode community.

Predictor variableConstantCoefficientR2FP
RiceFN3.3680.0040.55823.968< 0.001
WheatOP1.6130.0050.888150.214< 0.001

FN: the number of soil free-living nematodes; OP: the number of omnivorous and predatory nematodes.

The values are fitted in the equation: y = a + bx1 + cx2; y = grain yield; x1 and x2 are the independent variables; and a, b and c are coefficients.

Stepwise regression of grain yields of rice and wheat with the soil nematode community. FN: the number of soil free-living nematodes; OP: the number of omnivorous and predatory nematodes. The values are fitted in the equation: y = a + bx1 + cx2; y = grain yield; x1 and x2 are the independent variables; and a, b and c are coefficients.

Discussion

Compared to the unfertilized treatment, the total number of nematode was increased in rice and wheat fields due to fertilizer application. In particular, there was a significant increase in the NPK and manure combined with the chemical fertilizer treatments. Similarly, increasing total nematode abundances after application of manure were also reported by Villenave , Forge and Hu & Qi (2013). The increase of nematode populations could possibly be linked directly to higher food resources associated with the input of organic matter (Villenave et al., 2003). Increasing total number of nematodes due to application of chemical fertilizer was also reported by other studies (Li ; Hu ). Villenave et al. (2010) also observed that soil free-living nematodes were increased due to organic and mineral fertilizer use. Fungi-feeding and plant-feeding nematode abundances were not significantly different among treatments in the present study. This result is not consistent with previous studies showing that organic materials application resulted in an increase of fungal feeders abundances (Ferris & Matute, 2003; Wang ; Villenave et al., 2010) and that plant-feeding nematodes were increased due to compost and chemical fertilizer application in a maize field (Hu & Qi, 2010). The omnivorous and predatory nematodes were the most dominant groups in the present study. In contrast, bacterial feeders were the most abundant group in paddy field (Ou et al., 2005), in yellow squash field (Wang ), and in Horqin sandy land (Jiang ; Guan ). Plant-feeding nematodes were prevalent in maize and wheat fields (Hu & Qi, 2010, 2013; Zhang ), in sorghum field (Villenave et al., 2010), and in millet field (Diakhaté et al., 2013). Compared to the unfertilized treatment, the abundance omnivore-predators was increased in rice and wheat fields due to fertilizer use. A similar study also showed that the application of manure to an agricultural field could increase the abundance of omnivorous nematodes (Villenave ). Li et al. (2010) reported that organic fertilizer application increased the relative abundance of omnivore-carnivores, but different levels of applied nitrogen fertilizer decreased their relative abundance under greenhouse conditions. The composition and abundance of omnivores and carnivores were not affected by the soil amendments (Villenave et al., 2010) and the effect of organic amendment on omnivorous and predatory nematodes was minimal (Wang ). However, Forge reported that high amount manure and chemical fertilizer application reduced omnivorous nematode abundance, but predacious nematodes were more abundant in manure-treated soil than in fertilized soil. Abundant omnivorous and predatory nematodes in the manure-treated soils suggested that more complex soil food webs are expected to result in greater biodiversity of the belowground organisms mediating multiple soil ecosystem functions (Ferris ). For example, carnivores, through preying on plant-parasitic nematodes, were regarded as having potential for the biological regulation of pest species (Steel & Ferris, 2016). The increase of omnivorous and predacious nematodes were beneficial for soil health because omnivores and predators play an important role in further mineralizing soil nutrients tied up in bacteria-feeders or fungi-feeders, as well as preying on other nematodes including plant-parasitic nematodes (Wang ; Khan & Kim, 2007). Prodorylamus were the dominant genera in the present study. However, Helicotylenchus and Scutellonema were predominant in millet field (Diakhaté et al., 2013), Pratylenchus and Tylenchorhynchus were dominant in sorghum field (Villenave et al., 2010) and Tylenchorhynchus, Pratylenchus and Rotylenchus were the dominant genera in wheat field (Hu & Qi, 2013). The number of nematode genera (39) in the present study was lower than in paddy field (45) (Lü ), in maize field (48) (Liang et al., 2009), and in banana field (56) (Zhong ), but similar to the result in a continuous sorghum field (38) (Villenave et al., 2010), in soybean field (37) (Pan ), and in Tibetan plateau grassland (41) (Hu et al., 2017). The number of soil free-living nematode was a significant predictor of rice grain yields and the number of omnivorous and predatory nematode was a significant predictor of wheat grain yields. Similarly, Mandal reported that alkaline phosphatase activity was significant (P < 0.001) for predicting the grain yields of wheat at the dough stages of wheat growth. Hu & Qi (2013) observed that soil free-living nematode was a significant (P < 0.05) predictor of wheat grain yields during the jointing stage of wheat growth.

Conclusions

Based on these results, we deduced that long-term application of organic manure and chemical fertilizer modified the soil nematode community structure, increased crop yields. Total nematode abundance had an increasing tendency with soil nutrient input increments in rice and wheat fields. The number of total soil nematode was significantly increased due to organic manure combined with the chemical fertilizer application in rice field. Omnivores and predators and Prodorylaimus were significantly higher in the organic manure combined with NPK fertilizer treatments than in the chemical fertilizer alone and in the unfertilized treatments in rice and wheat fields. Stepwise regressions revealed that the number of soil free-living nematode was a significant predictor of rice grain yields (R2 = 0.56) and the number of omnivorous and predatory nematode was a significant predictor of wheat grain yield (R2 = 0.89). In conclusion, long-term application of organic manure combined with chemical fertilizer could increase nematode abundances and raise crop yields. Organic manure combined with chemical fertilizer application was recommended in agricultural ecosystem.
  5 in total

1.  Effect of long-term application of manure and fertilizer on biological and biochemical activities in soil during crop development stages.

Authors:  Asit Mandal; Ashok K Patra; Dhyan Singh; Anand Swarup; R Ebhin Masto
Journal:  Bioresour Technol       Date:  2007-01-05       Impact factor: 9.642

2.  Feeding habits in soil nematode families and genera-an outline for soil ecologists.

Authors:  G W Yeates; T Bongers; R G De Goede; D W Freckman; S S Georgieva
Journal:  J Nematol       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 1.402

3.  Role of nematodes in soil health and their use as indicators.

Authors:  D A Neher
Journal:  J Nematol       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 1.402

4.  Effect of soil properties, heavy metals and emerging contaminants in the soil nematodes diversity.

Authors:  Carmen Gutiérrez; Carlos Fernández; Miguel Escuer; Raquel Campos-Herrera; Mª Eulalia Beltrán Rodríguez; Gregoria Carbonell; Jose Antonio Rodríguez Martín
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2016-02-17       Impact factor: 8.071

5.  Effect of Compost and Maize Cultivars on Plant-parasitic Nematodes.

Authors:  R McSorley; R N Gallaher
Journal:  J Nematol       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 1.402

  5 in total
  2 in total

1.  Suppressiveness of Soil Amendments with Pelleted Plant Materials on the Root-knot Nematode Meloidogyne Incognita.

Authors:  T D'Addabbo; V D Migunova; M Renčo; N Sasanelli
Journal:  Helminthologia       Date:  2020-11-19       Impact factor: 1.184

2.  Vertical Distribution of Soil Free-living Nematode in a Playa Habitat in the North-Western Negev Desert, Israel.

Authors:  C Hu; S Pen-Mouratov; Y Steinberger
Journal:  Helminthologia       Date:  2020-11-19       Impact factor: 1.184

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.