Literature DB >> 31662588

Edge Factors: Scientific Frontier Positions of Nations.

Mikko Packalen1.   

Abstract

A key decision in scientific work is whether to build on novel or well-established ideas. Because exploiting new ideas is often harder than more conventional science, novel work can be especially dependent on interactions with colleagues, the training environment, and ready access to potential collaborators. Location may thus influence the tendency to pursue work that is close to the edge of the scientific frontier in the sense that it builds on recent ideas. We calculate for each nation its position relative to the edge of the scientific frontier by measuring its propensity to build on relatively new ideas in biomedical research. Text analysis of 20+ million publications shows that the United States and South Korea have the highest tendencies for novel science. China has become a leader in favoring newer ideas when working with basic science ideas and research tools, but is still slow to adopt new clinical ideas. Many locations remain far behind the leaders in terms of their tendency to work with novel ideas, indicating that the world is far from flat in this regard.

Entities:  

Keywords:  idea adoption; impact factor; new ideas; novelty; science

Year:  2019        PMID: 31662588      PMCID: PMC6818715          DOI: 10.1007/s11192-018-2991-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scientometrics        ISSN: 0138-9130            Impact factor:   3.238


  13 in total

1.  Citation indexes for science; a new dimension in documentation through association of ideas.

Authors:  E GARFIELD
Journal:  Science       Date:  1955-07-15       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Neophilia Ranking of Scientific Journals.

Authors:  Mikko Packalen; Jay Bhattacharya
Journal:  Scientometrics       Date:  2016-10-22       Impact factor: 3.238

3.  Impact factor distortions.

Authors:  Bruce Alberts
Journal:  Science       Date:  2013-05-17       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  China's rise as a major contributor to science and technology.

Authors:  Yu Xie; Chunni Zhang; Qing Lai
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-06-16       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  Ranking games.

Authors:  Margit Osterloh; Bruno S Frey
Journal:  Eval Rev       Date:  2014-08-04

6.  Choosing experiments to accelerate collective discovery.

Authors:  Andrey Rzhetsky; Jacob G Foster; Ian T Foster; James A Evans
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-11-09       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation.

Authors:  E Garfield
Journal:  Science       Date:  1972-11-03       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Age and the Trying Out of New Ideas.

Authors:  Mikko Packalen; Jay Bhattacharya
Journal:  J Hum Cap       Date:  2019

9.  Looking Across and Looking Beyond the Knowledge Frontier: Intellectual Distance, Novelty, and Resource Allocation in Science.

Authors:  Kevin J Boudreau; Eva C Guinan; Karim R Lakhani; Christoph Riedl
Journal:  Manage Sci       Date:  2016-01-08       Impact factor: 4.883

10.  Identifying translational science within the triangle of biomedicine.

Authors:  Griffin M Weber
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2013-05-24       Impact factor: 5.531

View more
  1 in total

1.  'All things are in flux': China in global science.

Authors:  Simon Marginson
Journal:  High Educ (Dordr)       Date:  2021-05-29
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.