Jayshree Dave1, John Paul2,3, Thomas Joshua Pasvol4, Andy Williams4, Fiona Warburton5, Kevin Cole6, Victoria Fotini Miari7, Richard Stabler7, David W Eyre8,9. 1. National Infection Service, Public Health Laboratory London, Public Health England, London, UK. 2. Department of Global Health and Infection, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, UK. 3. Department of Microbiology, Royal Sussex County Hospital, Brighton, UK. 4. Ambrose King Centre, Royal London Hospital, London, UK. 5. Statistics, Modelling and Economics Department, Public Health England, London, UK. 6. Department of Microbiology, Public Health England Collaborative Centre, Royal Sussex County Hospital, Brighton, UK. 7. Department of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK. 8. Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK david.eyre@ndm.ox.ac.uk. 9. Big Data Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
International travel complicates gonorrhoea transmission and exacerbates the spread of antibiotic resistance.1 Technologies such as whole-genome sequencing (WGS) have the potential to revolutionise gonorrhoea diagnosis and treatment in sexual health clinics where repeat attendance is not guaranteed. Previous WGS studies in Brighton, UK, identified transmission networks in a predominantly white British population of men who have sex with men (MSM), revealing clusters with mixed HIV serostatus and links between Brighton, London and the USA.2 3 Among diverse urban populations, STI incidence differences have been reported between ethnic groups.4 Such differences have been explained by assortative sexual mixing patterns.5 The targeting of public health efforts requires understanding of transmission networks.Our objective was to combine WGS and epidemiological data to improve our understanding of gonorrhoea transmission networks and antimicrobial resistance in the cosmopolitan population of London.
Methods
Setting and participants
We undertook a retrospective, observational study of unselected patients attending sexual health clinics during two sampling periods (from 20 May 2013 to 16 August 2013 and from 3 December 2013 to 21 March 2014) at Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK, serving a diverse population with >100 000 attendances per year of which around 10% are MSM. Genital and extragenital isolates were collected, according to sexual history, from symptomatic and asymptomatic patients as part of routine care. Information was retrieved regarding: symptoms, age, sex, ethnicity, sexual orientation, HIV and hepatitis B serostatus, recreational/intravenous drug use, number of sexual partners in the last 3 months, sex abroad and nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT) results.
Antimicrobial susceptibility
Susceptibilities were determined at either of two laboratories, the Royal Sussex County Hospital, Brighton and the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, using European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing and British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy methods, respectively. Breakpoints used to categorise samples as susceptible and resistant were: azithromycin: ≤0.25 and >0.5; cefixime: ≤0.125 and >0.125; ciprofloxacin: ≤0.03 and >0.06; penicillin: ≤0.06 and >1; and tetracycline: ≤0.5 and >1 mg/L.6 Descriptive analyses and Fisher’s exact test were undertaken to examine relationships between antimicrobial susceptibilities and risk factors.
Whole-genome sequencing
One isolate per patient was sequenced. Isolates labelled ‘BR−’ underwent WGS on the Illumina HiSeq platform as described previously.2 Isolates labelled ‘LN−’ underwent Illumina MiSeq 2×251 bp paired-end sequencing as per manufacturer’s protocol. Sequence data were processed using a bioinformatic pipeline, described previously.2 Briefly, sequence reads were mapped to the Neisseria gonorrhoeae NCCP11945 reference genome, and high-quality variants were identified. Samples with >70% of the reference genome identified were included in the study. Samples were compared using maximum likelihood phylogenies,7 after correction for recombination using ClonalFrameML.8 Sequences are available on the NCBI SRA under BioProject PRJNA522696.
Results
Demographic data
Data were available for 158 patients. One hundred and twenty-nine (82%) identified as male and 25 (16%) as female; data were unavailable for four patients. One hundred and twenty-three (78%) individuals were born in Europe (96 (61%) in the UK), 6 (4%) Africa, 6 (4%) South America, 5 (3%) South Asia, 5 (3%) South-East Asia/Australia and 4 (3%) in the Caribbean (data unavailable for nine patients). Self-reported recorded ethnicities were: 51 (32%) English/Welsh/Scottish; 33 (21%) white, other; 23 (15%) black British/black African/black, other; 12 (8%) Caribbean; 9 (6%) South Asian; 6 (4%) mixed; and 10 (6%) other groups (14 data unavailable).Patients reported their sexual orientation as: 82 (52%) MSM, 49 (31%) heterosexual and 2 (1%) bisexual (data unavailable for 25 individuals). Regarding HIV status, 22 (14%) were HIV positive (16 on treatment) and 109 (69%) were HIV negative; (data unavailable for 27). One hundred and twenty-two (77%) were hepatitis B negative and 2 (1%) had hepatitis B coinfection (unavailable for 34 patients). Data on recreational drug use were available for 24 patients: 11 (46%) reported use and 13 (54%) denied use. No intravenous drug use was recorded.The number of sexual partners within the last 3 months varied from 1 to 60: 27 patients (17%) reported one partner, 31 (20%) two partners, 16 (10%) 3–4 partners, 9 (6%) 5–9 partners and 15 (9%) ≥10 partners (data unavailable for 60 (38%)). Partner notification occurred for at least 94 (59%) individuals: information was not available for 42 (27%) and notification did not occur for 22 (14%) patients. Twelve (8%) reported sex abroad. One isolate per patient was analysed from the following anatomical sites: 76 (48%) urethral, 29 (18%) rectal, 11 (7%) cervical, 9 (6%) pharyngeal and 33 (21%) not specified. NAAT testing results were available for 109 culture-positive patients; three were NAAT negative.
Antimicrobial susceptibility data
Antimicrobial susceptibility results were as follows: azithromycin: susceptible 96 (61%), intermediate 7 (4%), resistant 1 (1%) and not available 54 (34%); ciprofloxacin: susceptible 104 (66%), intermediate 1 (1%), resistant 37 (23%) and not available 16 (10%); and tetracycline: susceptible 36 (23%), intermediate 19 (12%), resistant 35 (22%) and not available 68 (43%). All 156 tested isolates were ceftriaxone susceptible (data not available for two). There was no demonstrable relationship between antimicrobial susceptibility for any antibiotic and sexual orientation (Fisher’s exact test: p≥0.49 across all antibiotics) or number of partners (p≥0.43).WGS data were successfully generated for 151/158 (96%) isolates. After mapping a median (IQR) (range) 89.1% (87.7%–89.6%) (77.8–90.6%) of the NCCP11945 reference genome was identified. We applied our previously described transmission nomogram2 to link cases related by possible direct person-to-person transmission or indirect transmission via one or more intermediate cases. Cases were considered genetically linked if the number of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) between them fell within the 99% prediction interval for the number expected between transmitted cases based on the time between sampling. Of 151 cases, 76 (50%) were not linked to another case, 30 (20%) belonged to potential transmission pairs, 39 (26%) triplets and 6 cases (4%) formed the largest cluster (figure 1). Overall, 105 distinct genetic subtypes of N. gonorrhoeae were observed. The largest cluster spanned June 2013 to March 2014 and consisted of four MSM, one heterosexual male and a male with undisclosed sexual orientation. All six men were born in Europe (four in the UK) and from varying ethnic groups: white, South Asian and mixed ethnicity. One was HIV positive (treated); another had chronic hepatitis B infection.
Figure 1
Phylogeny of 151 Neisseria
gonorrhoeae isolates from London, May 2013–March 2014. Tips with coloured triangles represent potential transmission clusters, based on the genetic distance and time between isolates.2 The colouring of each transmission cluster is arbitrary. The right-hand panels show associated epidemiological data regarding HIV serostatus, sexual orientation and self-reported ethnic group. MSM, men who have sex with men.
Phylogeny of 151 Neisseria
gonorrhoeae isolates from London, May 2013–March 2014. Tips with coloured triangles represent potential transmission clusters, based on the genetic distance and time between isolates.2 The colouring of each transmission cluster is arbitrary. The right-hand panels show associated epidemiological data regarding HIV serostatus, sexual orientation and self-reported ethnic group. MSM, men who have sex with men.Figure 1 shows all sequenced isolates with patient information. We investigated for evidence of genetic clustering of cases by reported sexual orientation (as a positive control), HIV serostatus and ethnicity. We considered the number of pairs of cases within genetic clusters who shared the same characteristic and compared this with the distribution when we randomly permuted the characteristic labels 1000 times. Forty-one within-cluster pairs had the same reported sexual orientation and seven had different orientations; 21 pairs had missing data. Under the permutated model, representing the distribution expected by chance, many more within-cluster pairs had different sexual orientations, median 23 pairs (95% CI 14 to 30); that is, there is strong evidence for clustering by sexual orientation as the number of observed pairs with different sexual orientations was much lower than the lower bound of the permutation CI.However, there was no evidence of HIV serosorting beyond that expected by chance: 34 potential transmission pairs had the same HIV serostatus and 12 pairs differed; data were missing for 23 pairs. This compares with 17 discordant pairs (95% CI 10 to 23, ie, containing 12) under the random model. All HIV-positive patients with available data identified as MSM (n=21) or bisexual (n=1). Similarly, within the limits of the power of the study, there was no evidence for clustering by ethnic group, 15 pairs shared the same ethnic group, 45 a different ethnic group, and data were missing for nine pairs. Forty-five (95% CI 36 to 52) discordant pairs were expected under the random permutation model.Overall proportions of cases involved in any cluster were similar by ethnic group (Fisher’s exact test: p=0.64) and HIV serostatus (p=0.35). Forty-five out of 82 (55%) MSM or bisexual clients with sequencing data were in genetic clusters of ≥2 cases, compared with 16/44 (36%) of clients identifying as heterosexual (p=0.06). Fifty-six per cent (14/25) patients not recording their sexuality were part of potential transmission clusters.
Discussion
Using combined WGS and epidemiological data, we investigated gonorrhoea in a diverse urban population. Previous studies4 5 demonstrated variation in gonorrhoea incidence within different ethnic groups. We detected no evidence of clustering by ethnicity. Therefore, our findings do not support the hypothesis that infection rate differences between ethnic groups can be explained by assortative sexual mixing. However, our study was limited by the relatively small sample size, with only 151 isolates sequenced.We demonstrated increased linkage of cases among MSM, and we detected clusters involving MSM of mixed HIV serostatus, as reported previously3 and contrary to the findings of a study using samples from 2004.9 We demonstrate bridging events between different ethnicities and sexual orientation. We found less case clustering than in Brighton.3 This may reflect less complete sampling, as London is served by multiple clinics and less clustering of cases in the non-MSM population.Our results show evidence of transmission in heterosexuals and in MSMs of different ethnicity. As in Brighton, we found evidence of gonorrhoea transmission involving patients of mixed HIV serostatus. Decreased concern regarding HIV risks may be contributing to increased condomless sex and gonorrhoea transmission. The impact on transmission networks of the wider availability of HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis since this study could be investigated using WGS in future.
Authors: Joanna Peters; Fiona Cresswell; Lauren Amor; Kevin Cole; Gillian Dean; Xavier Didelot; Dilrini De Silva; David W Eyre; John Paul Journal: Sex Transm Infect Date: 2017-10-11 Impact factor: 3.519
Authors: Xavier Didelot; Janina Dordel; Lilith K Whittles; Caitlin Collins; Nicole Bilek; Cynthia J Bishop; Peter J White; David M Aanensen; Julian Parkhill; Stephen D Bentley; Brian G Spratt; Simon R Harris Journal: mBio Date: 2016-06-28 Impact factor: 7.867
Authors: Teodora Wi; Monica M Lahra; Francis Ndowa; Manju Bala; Jo-Anne R Dillon; Pilar Ramon-Pardo; Sergey R Eremin; Gail Bolan; Magnus Unemo Journal: PLoS Med Date: 2017-07-07 Impact factor: 11.069
Authors: Sebastiaan H Hulstein; Amy Matser; Catharina J Alberts; Marieke B Snijder; Martina Willhauck-Fleckenstein; Katrin Hufnagel; Maria Prins; Henry J C de Vries; Maarten F Schim van der Loeff; Tim Waterboer Journal: BMC Infect Dis Date: 2018-12-03 Impact factor: 3.090
Authors: Dilrini De Silva; Joanna Peters; John Paul; David W Eyre; Kevin Cole; Michelle J Cole; Fiona Cresswell; Gillian Dean; Jayshree Dave; Daniel Rh Thomas; Kirsty Foster; Alison Waldram; Daniel J Wilson; Xavier Didelot; Yonatan H Grad; Derrick W Crook; Tim Ea Peto; A Sarah Walker Journal: Lancet Infect Dis Date: 2016-07-12 Impact factor: 25.071