Alberto Dominguez-Rodriguez1, Pablo Avanzas2, Pedro Abreu-Gonzalez3, Nestor Baez-Ferrer4, Francisco J Martín-Sanchez5, Óscar Mirò6. 1. Servicio de Cardiología, Hospital Universitario de Canarias, San Cristóbal de La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain; Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Europea de Canarias, La Orotava, Tenerife, Spain. Electronic address: adrvdg@hotmail.com. 2. Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, Servicio de Cardiología, Oviedo, Spain; Departamento de Medicina, Universidad de Oviedo, Oviedo, Spain; Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Principado de Asturias (ISPA), Spain. 3. Departamento de Ciencias Médicas Básicas (Unidad de Fisiología), Universidad de La Laguna, San Cristóbal de La Laguna, Sta. Cruz de Tenerife, Spain. 4. Servicio de Cardiología, Hospital Universitario de Canarias, San Cristóbal de La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain. 5. Servicio de Urgencias, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Centro Nacional de Investigaciones Cardiovasculares Carlos III (CNIC), Madrid, Spain. 6. Área de Urgencias, Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain; Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Barcelona, Spain.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Adherence to the Mediterranean diet (MedDiet) has been associated with prolonged survival in older individuals. However, it is unknown whether adherence to MedDiet is associated with the prognosis in older patients scheduled to undergo cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). The aim of this study was to evaluate the association between adherence to the MedDiet and clinical outcomes at 12 months follow-up after CRT implantation in older patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients adherents to the MedDiet, defined as ≥ 9 of 14 points using the PREDIMED (Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease with a Mediterranean Diet Study) questionnaire, was assessed before device implantation in patient's ≥ 70 years candidates for CRT. The primary outcome was a combined endpoint at 12 months follow-up after CRT implantation, defined as cardiovascular death, cardiac transplantation or decompensated heart failure. The cohort study consisted of 284 patients with a mean age of 73 ± 3 years. One hundred and fifty-nine (55.9%) patients were classified as adherent to the MedDiet. Seventy (24.6%) patients showed the combined endpoint at one year follow-up. Subjects who did not developed the combined endpoint had higher proportion of adherent patients to the MedDiet compared to patients who developed the combined endpoint (85% vs 67.1%, p = 0.002). After adjustment by possible confounders, the adherence to the MedDiet was a protective and significant predictor of the combined endpoint (HR = 0.42, 95% CI 0.22-0.81; p = 0.01). CONCLUSION: Adherence to the MedDiet is inversely associated with outcome in older patients following CRT.
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Adherence to the Mediterranean diet (MedDiet) has been associated with prolonged survival in older individuals. However, it is unknown whether adherence to MedDiet is associated with the prognosis in older patients scheduled to undergo cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). The aim of this study was to evaluate the association between adherence to the MedDiet and clinical outcomes at 12 months follow-up after CRT implantation in older patients. METHODS AND RESULTS:Patients adherents to the MedDiet, defined as ≥ 9 of 14 points using the PREDIMED (Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease with a Mediterranean Diet Study) questionnaire, was assessed before device implantation in patient's ≥ 70 years candidates for CRT. The primary outcome was a combined endpoint at 12 months follow-up after CRT implantation, defined as cardiovascular death, cardiac transplantation or decompensated heart failure. The cohort study consisted of 284 patients with a mean age of 73 ± 3 years. One hundred and fifty-nine (55.9%) patients were classified as adherent to the MedDiet. Seventy (24.6%) patients showed the combined endpoint at one year follow-up. Subjects who did not developed the combined endpoint had higher proportion of adherent patients to the MedDiet compared to patients who developed the combined endpoint (85% vs 67.1%, p = 0.002). After adjustment by possible confounders, the adherence to the MedDiet was a protective and significant predictor of the combined endpoint (HR = 0.42, 95% CI 0.22-0.81; p = 0.01). CONCLUSION: Adherence to the MedDiet is inversely associated with outcome in older patients following CRT.