| Literature DB >> 31661837 |
Siti Aishah Abdul Aziz1, Saiful Amri Mazlan2,3, U Ubaidillah4,5, Muhammad Kashfi Shabdin6, Nurul Azhani Yunus7, Nur Azmah Nordin8, Seung-Bok Choi9, Rizuan Mohd Rosnan10.
Abstract
Carbon-based particles, such as graphite and graphene, have been widely used as a filler in magnetorheological elastomer (MRE) fabrication in order to obtain electrical properties of the material. However, these kinds of fillers normally require a very high concentration of particles to enhance the conductivity property. Therefore, in this study, the nanosized Ni-Mg cobalt ferrite is introduced as a filler to soften MRE and, at the same time, improve magnetic, rheological, and conductivity properties. Three types of MRE samples without and with different compositions of Mg, namely Co0.5Ni0.2Mg0.3Fe2O4 (A1) and Co0.5Ni0.1Mg0.4Fe2O4 (A2), are fabricated. The characterization related to the micrograph, magnetic, and rheological properties of the MRE samples are analyzed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM), vibrating sample magnetometer (VSM), and the rheometer. Meanwhile, the effect of the nanosized Ni-Mg cobalt ferrites on the electrical resistance property is investigated and compared with the different Mg compositions. It is shown that the storage modulus of the MRE sample with the nanosized Ni-Mg cobalt ferrites is 43% higher than that of the MRE sample without the nanomaterials. In addition, it is demonstrated that MREs with the nanosized Ni-Mg cobalt ferrites exhibit relatively low electrical resistance at the on-state as compared to the off-state condition, because MRE with a higher Mg composition shows lower electrical resistance when higher current flow occurs through the materials. This salient property of the proposed MRE can be effectively and potentially used as an actuator to control the viscoelastic property of the magnetic field or sensors to measure the strain of the flexible structures by the electrical resistance signal.Entities:
Keywords: electrical resistance; filler; hetero-aggregation; magnetorheological elastomer; nanosized Ni-Mg cobalt ferrites; resistivity; rheological properties
Year: 2019 PMID: 31661837 PMCID: PMC6862635 DOI: 10.3390/ma12213531
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Figure 1Fabrication flow chart of the proposed magnetorheological elastomer (MRE) samples.
Magnetic flux density of the MRE samples.
| Samples | Magnetic Flux Densities (T) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current (A) | ||||||
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | |
| MRE | 0 | 0.211 | 0.412 | 0.599 | 0.748 | 0.854 |
| MRE + A1 | 0 | 0.209 | 0.411 | 0.598 | 0.773 | 0.884 |
| MRE + A2 | 0 | 0.214 | 0.416 | 0.608 | 0.774 | 0.889 |
Figure 2Test rig for the conductivity test.
Figure 3Field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM) images for (a) A1 and (b) A2 at 50,000× magnification at a voltage of 2.0 kV.
Figure 4Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images for MRE + A2 at (a) 1000× and (b) 2500× magnification.
Figure 5Magnetization curves for all MRE samples.
Summary of the nanosized Ni-Mg cobalt ferrites and all MRE samples.
| Samples | MRE | A1 [ | MRE + A1 | A2 [ | MRE + A2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ms (Am2/kg) | 140.25 | 47.34 | 143.92 | 54.62 | 143.77 |
| Mr (Am2/kg) | 0.32 | 26.41 | 0.61 | 29.13 | 0.59 |
| Hc (Oe) | 8.70 | 621.27 | 15.71 | 608.17 | 15.33 |
Figure 6Storage modulus versus strain of all MRE samples (a) MRE, (b) MRE + A1, and (c) MRE + A2.
Figure 7Mechanism of particle movement in the MRE samples (a) MRE + A1 and (b) MRE + A2.
Figure 8Loss factor versus strain at various magnetic fields for (a) MRE, (b) MRE + A1, and (c) MRE + A2.
Figure 9The storage modulus of all MRE samples as a function of magnetic flux density.
The initial modulus, absolute (Δ), and relative magnetoresistance (MR) effect.
| Samples | G0 (MPa) | ΔG (MPa) | MR Effect (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| MRE | 0.19 | 0.30 | 157.89 |
| MRE + A1 | 0.07 | 0.40 | 571.43 |
| MRE + A2 | 0.26 | 0.56 | 215.38 |
Figure 10Electrical resistance comparison of MRE samples at the off- (0 T) and the on-state (0.1 T) conditions.
The electrical resistance of MRE + A1 and MRE + A2 with an increment of weight at the off-state (0 T) and the on-state (0.1 T) conditions.
| Samples/Weight (g) | MRE + A1 | MRE + A2 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 T | 0.1 T | 0 T | 0.1 T | |
| 50 | 9848.63 Ω | 9533.67 Ω | 9938.91 Ω | 9845.05 Ω |
| 100 | 6431.33 Ω | 1929.30 Ω | 7906.90 Ω | 6698.81 Ω |
| 150 | 1744.36 Ω | 523.21 Ω | 2771.35 Ω | 2537.91 Ω |
| 200 | 929.08 Ω | 185.84 Ω | 1085.38 Ω | 1048.48 Ω |
| 250 | 314.55 Ω | 94.25 Ω | 369.11 Ω | 359.45 Ω |
| 300 | 232.83 Ω | 46.43 Ω | 285.56 Ω | 268.98 Ω |
| 350 | 180.45 Ω | 54.03 Ω | 200.62 Ω | 183.40 Ω |
| 400 | 112.82 Ω | 33.67 Ω | 120.34 Ω | 112.86 Ω |
| 450 | 88.15 Ω | 17.69 Ω | 98.26 Ω | 96.01 Ω |
| 500 | 55.68 Ω | 16.58 Ω | 62.66 Ω | 49.30 Ω |
| 550 | 10.12 Ω | 5.06 Ω | 17.81 Ω | 8.17 Ω |
| 600 | 1.73 Ω | 0.20 Ω | 3.02 Ω | 2.37 Ω |
Figure 11Mechanism of particles interaction in MRE with the absence and presence of magnetic and electric fields.