| Literature DB >> 31661792 |
Gaowa Kang1, Maryia Mishyna2, Kwame Sarpong Appiah3, Masaaki Yamada4, Akihito Takano5, Valery Prokhorov6, Yoshiharu Fujii7,8.
Abstract
One hundred and thirty-nine medicinal plant species were screened for their allelopathic activity through volatile emissions using Lactuca sativa as a test plant. Volatile emissions from the leaves of star anise (Illicium verum) showed the highest inhibition (100%) on the radicle and hypocotyl growth. Using headspace gas collection and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS), seven major volatile compounds from the leaves of star anise, including α-pinene, β-pinene, camphene, 1,8-cineole, D-limonene, camphor, and L-fenchone were detected. To determine volatile compounds that may contribute to the inhibitory activity of star anise, the allelopathic potential of individual volatiles from star anise was evaluated using the cotton swab bioassay. The EC50 was calculated for each of the seven identified compounds. L-fenchone showed the strongest growth inhibitory activity (EC50 is 1.0 ng/cm3 for radicle and hypocotyl growth of lettuce), followed by 1,8-cineole, and camphene. This is the first report that L-fenchone could be an important volatile allelochemical from the leaves of star anise. From the actual concentration of each volatile compound in headspace and EC50 value, we concluded that the four volatile compounds, including L-fenchone, 1,8-cineole, β-pinene, and camphene are the most important contributors to the volatile allelopathy of star anise.Entities:
Keywords: 1,8-cineole; Illicium verum; L-fenchone; allelopathy; camphene; star anise; volatile; β-pinene
Year: 2019 PMID: 31661792 PMCID: PMC6918414 DOI: 10.3390/plants8110457
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Plants (Basel) ISSN: 2223-7747
Top 30 plant with the most potent inhibitory activity of radicle and hypocotyl growth of lettuce (L. sativa) seedlings (% compared to control) through volatiles.
| Name | Family | H (%) | Criteria | R (%) | Criteria |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Schisandraceae | 0.0 | **** | 0.0 | **** | |
| Capparaceae | 13.8 | **** | 105.0 | ||
| Dipterocarpaceae | 65.6 | *** | 109.0 | ||
| Annonaceae | 68.2 | *** | 101.0 | ||
| Menispermaceae | 68.8 | *** | 101.0 | ||
| Lauraceae | 68.9 | *** | 97.0 | ||
| Orchidaceae | 69.7 | *** | 95.0 | ||
| Euphorbiaceae | 75.3 | ** | 93.0 | ||
| Asteraceae | 77.2 | ** | 91.0 | ||
| Lauraceae | 77.3 | ** | 87.0 | * | |
| Bignoniaceae | 77.3 | ** | 89.0 | * | |
| Piperaceae | 78.2 | ** | 85.0 | * | |
| Combretaceae | 78.5 | ** | 83.0 | * | |
| Amaryllidaceae | 78.6 | ** | 107.1 | ||
| Menispermaceae | 79.5 | * | 94.3 | ||
| Malpighiaceae | 79.5 | ** | 109.8 | ||
| Asteraceae | 80.3 | * | 75.8 | ** | |
| Berberidaceae | 80.7 | * | 84.5 | * | |
| Malvaceae | 81.8 | * | 100.6 | ||
| Santalaceae | 81.8 | * | 115.2 | ||
| Fabaceae | 82.7 | * | 94.0 | ||
| Polygalaceae | 83.5 | * | 108.6 | ||
| Lamiaceae | 83.9 | * | 105.0 | ||
| Caprifoliaceae | 84.7 | * | 116.6 | ||
| Fabaceae | 85.1 | * | 115.1 | ||
| Amaranthaceae | 85.5 | * | 90.4 | ||
| Moraceae | 85.6 | * | 88.3 | * | |
| Euphorbiaceae | 86.0 | * | 95.8 | ||
| Eucommiaceae | 87.2 | * | 108.1 | ||
| Sapotaceae | 87.5 | * | 110.1 | ||
| Mean (M) | 98.0 | 100.7 | |||
| Standard Deviation (SD) | 18.4 | 21.5 | |||
| M-0.5 SD | 88.8 | * | 89.9 | * | |
| M-1.0 SD | 79.6 | ** | 79.2 | ** | |
| M-1.5 SD | 70.4 | *** | 68.5 | *** | |
| M-2.0 SD | 61.2 | **** | 57.7 | **** |
More [*] indicate stronger plant growth inhibitory activity. H: Hypocotyl (% of control), R: Radicle (% of control).
Figure 1Distribution of plant species according to their radicle growth of lettuce.
Figure 2Distribution of plant species according to their hypocotyl growth of lettuce.
Figure 3Effect of leaf volatiles from star anise on radicle and hypocotyl growth [%] of lettuce seedlings as a function of distance from plant material using the Dish Pack method.
Inhibitory activity (EC50) of the seven major compounds detected in the headspace of star anise on radicle and hypocotyl growth of lettuce seedlings.
| RT (min) | Name of Compounds | % of Compound | EC50 [ng/cm3] | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Radicle | Hypocotyl | |||
| 9.43 | α–pinene | 5.2 | 19.7 ± 8.2 | 16.2 ± 11.3 |
| 9.78 | camphene | 7.8 | 4.6 ± 0.2 | 5.7 ± 0.7 |
| 10.47 | β-pinene | 13.4 | 7.7 ± 3.5 | 6.5 ± 1.1 |
| 11.61 | D-limonene | 7.2 | 105.7 ± 67.6 | 24.0 ± 10.2 |
| 11.66 | 1,8-cineole | 17.9 | 3.7 ± 0.6 | 3.8 ± 1.6 |
| 12.80 | L-fenchone | 6.9 | 1.0 ± 0.2 | 1.0 ± 0.3 |
| 13.86 | camphor | 7.2 | 13.0 ± 3.6 | 7.6 ± 1.5 |
RT: Retention time, Data are the mean of three replications ± standard deviation.
Figure 4Structure of major volatile compounds from star anise leaves.
Figure 5Testing the effect of leave volatiles from star anise on radicle and hypocotyl growth (%) of lettuce seedlings as a function of distance from plant material using the Dish Pack method (a,b), samples for GC-MS analysis (c), and cotton swab method (d).