Toshifumi Tada1, Takashi Kumada1, Hidenori Toyoda1, Satoshi Yasuda1, Yasuhiro Sone2, Shinichi Hashinokuchi3, Sadanobu Ogawa3, Takuma Oguri4, Naohisa Kamiyama4, Makoto Chuma5, Tomoyuki Akita6, Junko Tanaka6. 1. Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Ogaki Municipal Hospital, Ogaki, Japan. 2. Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Ogaki Municipal Hospital, Ogaki, Japan. 3. Department of Imaging Diagnosis, Ogaki Municipal Hospital, Ogaki, Japan. 4. Ultrasound General Imaging, GE Healthcare, Hino, Tokyo, Japan. 5. Gastroenterological Center, Yokohama City University Medical Center, Yokohama, Japan. 6. Department of Epidemiology, Infectious Disease Control, and Prevention, Hiroshima University Institute of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima, Japan.
Abstract
AIM: Recently, a new method has been developed to diagnose hepatic steatosis with attenuation coefficients based on the ultrasound-guided attenuation parameter (UGAP). We investigated whether fibrosis identified by hepatic stiffness measurements based on magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) affects attenuation coefficient measurement using UGAP for the evaluation of hepatic steatosis. METHODS: A total of 608 patients with chronic liver disease were analyzed. Correlations between magnetic resonance imaging-determined proton density fat fraction (PDFF) or MRE value and attenuation coefficients were evaluated. In addition, the interaction between hepatic fibrosis and the attenuation coefficient was analyzed. RESULTS: The correlation coefficient (r) between PDFF values and attenuation coefficient values was 0.724, indicating a strong relationship. Conversely, the r between MRE values and attenuation coefficient values was -0.187, indicating almost no relationship. In the multiple regression assessment of the effect of PDFF and MRE on the attenuation coefficient based on UGAP, the P-values for PDFF, MRE, and PDFF × MRE were < 0.001, 0.277, and 0.903, respectively. In patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (n = 169), the r between PDFF values and attenuation coefficient values was 0.695, indicating a moderate relationship. Conversely, the r between MRE values and attenuation coefficient values was -0.068, indicating almost no relationship. In the multiple regression assessment of the effect of PDFF and MRE on the attenuation coefficient based on UGAP, the P-values for PDFF, MRE, and PDFF × MRE were <0.001, 0.948, and 0.706, respectively. CONCLUSION: UGAP-determined attenuation coefficient was weakly affected by liver stiffness, an indicator of hepatic fibrosis.
AIM: Recently, a new method has been developed to diagnose hepatic steatosis with attenuation coefficients based on the ultrasound-guided attenuation parameter (UGAP). We investigated whether fibrosis identified by hepatic stiffness measurements based on magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) affects attenuation coefficient measurement using UGAP for the evaluation of hepatic steatosis. METHODS: A total of 608 patients with chronic liver disease were analyzed. Correlations between magnetic resonance imaging-determined proton density fat fraction (PDFF) or MRE value and attenuation coefficients were evaluated. In addition, the interaction between hepatic fibrosis and the attenuation coefficient was analyzed. RESULTS: The correlation coefficient (r) between PDFF values and attenuation coefficient values was 0.724, indicating a strong relationship. Conversely, the r between MRE values and attenuation coefficient values was -0.187, indicating almost no relationship. In the multiple regression assessment of the effect of PDFF and MRE on the attenuation coefficient based on UGAP, the P-values for PDFF, MRE, and PDFF × MRE were < 0.001, 0.277, and 0.903, respectively. In patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (n = 169), the r between PDFF values and attenuation coefficient values was 0.695, indicating a moderate relationship. Conversely, the r between MRE values and attenuation coefficient values was -0.068, indicating almost no relationship. In the multiple regression assessment of the effect of PDFF and MRE on the attenuation coefficient based on UGAP, the P-values for PDFF, MRE, and PDFF × MRE were <0.001, 0.948, and 0.706, respectively. CONCLUSION: UGAP-determined attenuation coefficient was weakly affected by liver stiffness, an indicator of hepatic fibrosis.
Authors: Sun Kyung Jeon; Ijin Joo; So Yeon Kim; Jong Keon Jang; Juil Park; Hee Sun Park; Eun Sun Lee; Jeong Min Lee Journal: Ultrasonography Date: 2020-05-09