Literature DB >> 31661578

Effects of genotype on TENS effectiveness in controlling knee pain in persons with mild to moderate osteoarthritis.

Manika Govil1, Nandita Mukhopadhyay1, Teri Holwerda2, Kathleen Sluka3, Barbara Rakel4, Debra L Schutte5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study examined the extent to which genetic variability modifies Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) effectiveness in osteoarthritic knee pain.
METHODS: Seventy-five participants with knee osteoarthritis were randomly assigned to either: (a) High-frequency TENS, (b) Low-frequency TENS or (c) Transient Placebo TENS. Pain measures were collected pre- and post-treatment. Participants were genotyped on genes implicated in central or peripheral pain pathways: NGFB, NTRK1, EDNRA, EDNRB, EDN1, OPRM1, TAC1, TACR1, BDNF, BDKRB1, 5HTT, COMT, ESR2, IL6 and IL1B. Genetic association using linear regression modelling was performed separately for the transient placebo TENS subjects, and within the High-frequency TENS + Low-frequency TENS participants, including TENS level as a covariate.
RESULTS: In the placebo group, SNPs rs165599 (COMT) was significantly associated with an increased heat pain threshold (β = -1.87; p = .003) and rs6827096 (EDNRA) with an increased resting pain (β = 2.68; p = .001). Within the treatment groups, TENS effectiveness was reduced by the SNP rs6537485 (EDNRA) minor allele in relationship to mechanical sensation (β = 184.13; p = 5.5E-9). Individuals with the COMT rs4680 minor allele reported lowered pain at rest after TENS (β = -42.30; p = .001), with a higher magnitude of pain reduction (28 unit difference) in the low-frequency TENS group compared to the high-frequency TENS group (β = 28.37; p = .0004).
CONCLUSIONS: EDNRA and COMT are implicated in osteoarthritic knee pain and provide a basis for tailoring TENS interventions according to individual characteristics. SIGNIFICANCE: Findings from this study demonstrate that genetic variation within the COMT and EDNRA genes influences the effectiveness of TENS, a non-pharmacologic pain-reduction intervention, in the context of osteoarthritic knee pain. Evidence such as this may contribute to risk models that provide a clinically useful tool for personalizing TENS interventions according to individual characteristics in order to best control pain and maximize functional status.
© 2019 European Pain Federation - EFIC®.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31661578     DOI: 10.1002/ejp.1497

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Pain        ISSN: 1090-3801            Impact factor:   3.931


  4 in total

Review 1.  Characterising the Features of 381 Clinical Studies Evaluating Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) for Pain Relief: A Secondary Analysis of the Meta-TENS Study to Improve Future Research.

Authors:  Mark I Johnson; Carole A Paley; Priscilla G Wittkopf; Matthew R Mulvey; Gareth Jones
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2022-06-14       Impact factor: 2.948

2.  Computational Functional Genomics-Based AmpliSeq™ Panel for Next-Generation Sequencing of Key Genes of Pain.

Authors:  Dario Kringel; Sebastian Malkusch; Eija Kalso; Jörn Lötsch
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-01-16       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 3.  Resolving Long-Standing Uncertainty about the Clinical Efficacy of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) to Relieve Pain: A Comprehensive Review of Factors Influencing Outcome.

Authors:  Mark I Johnson
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2021-04-14       Impact factor: 2.430

4.  COMT rs4818, pain sensitivity and duration, and alveolar bone grafting of oral clefts.

Authors:  E M V M Silva; R H W Lacerda; I L Farias; B G N Cavalcante; I O Assis; M Bezamat; A Modesto; Alexandre Rezende Vieira
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2020-09-29
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.