| Literature DB >> 31661339 |
Agnieszka Pluta1, Tadeusz Robak1, Kamil Brzozowski1, Konrad Stepka1, Ewa Wawrzyniak1, Anna Krawczynska1, Magdalena Czemerska1, Anna Szmigielska-Kaplon1, Olga Grzybowska-Izydorczyk1, Mateusz Nowicki1, Piotr Stelmach1, Marta Kuydowicz1, Tomasz Gromek2, Marek Hus2, Grzegorz Helbig3, Sebastian Grosicki4, Ewa Bodzenta5, Małgorzata Razny6, Karol Wojcik6, Lukasz Bolkun7, Janusz Kloczko7, Wanda Knopinska-Posluszny8, Agnieszka Piekarska9, Andrzej Hellman9, Marta Sobas10, Tomasz Wrobel10, Elzbieta Patkowska11,12, Ewa Lech-Maranda11,12, Krzysztof Warzocha11, Jerzy Holowiecki13, Sebastian Giebel13, Agnieszka Wierzbowska1.
Abstract
We present the results of a prospective, non-randomized phase 2 trial in which 253 AML patients (pts) under 60 years old received DAC (Daunorubicin + AraC + Cladribine) as first induction followed by CLAM (Cladribine + AraC + Mitoxantrone) as early second induction on day 16 based on bone marrow (BM) blasts on day 14 (D14). The CR/CRi rate after a single course of DAC was 83% for pts with D14 BM blasts less than 10%. Forty-six pts had >10% BM blasts on D14, of whom 35 received CLAM with rates of CR/CRi 60% and early death (ED) 23%. The remaining 11 pts were not fit to receive CLAM, with rates of CR/CRi 28%, PR 18%, and ED 18%. Median OS was 7.2 versus 7.5 months, respectively. The overall CR/CRi rate was 77% after the first induction, with final CR/CRi rate 80% after DAC reinduction for pts who achieved PR with initial DAC course. CLAM used as early second induction might improve CR/CRi rates for younger AML pts with poor early response to DAC induction, but may be associated with higher mortality.Entities:
Keywords: AML; CLAM; early second induction
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31661339 DOI: 10.1080/10428194.2019.1678151
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Leuk Lymphoma ISSN: 1026-8022