Literature DB >> 31661082

Perception of the Progressing Digitization and Transformation of the German Health Care System Among Experts and the Public: Mixed Methods Study.

Arne Hansen1,2, Maximilian Herrmann1,3, Jan P Ehlers1, Thomas Mondritzki3, Kai Oliver Hensel4,5, Hubert Truebel1,3, Philip Boehme1,3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Health care systems worldwide are struggling to keep rising costs at bay with only modest outcome improvement among many diseases. Digitization with technologies like Artificial Intelligence or Machine Learning algorithms might address this. Although digital technologies have been successfully applied in clinical studies the effect on the overall health care system so far was limited. The regulatory ecosystem or data privacy might be responsible, but other reasons may also predominate.
OBJECTIVE: We analyzed how the digitization of the German health care market is currently perceived among different stakeholders and investigated reasons for its slow adaption.
METHODS: This was a mixed methods study split into a qualitative Part A using the conceptual approach of the Grounded Theory and a quantitative Part B using the Delphi method. For Part A we interviewed experts in the health care system and converted the results into 17 hypotheses. The Delphi method consisted of an online survey which was sent to the participants via email and was available for three months. For the assessment of the 17 hypotheses, the participants were given a six-point Likert scale. The participants were grouped into patients, physicians, and providers of services within the German health care market.
RESULTS: There was a strong alignment of opinions on the hypotheses between experts (N=21) and survey participants (N=733), with 70.5% overall agreement on 12/17 hypotheses. Physicians demonstrated the lowest level of agreement with the expert panel at 88% (15/17) disagreement, with the hypotheses "H8: Digitization in the health care system will free up jobs," and "H6: Digitization in the health care system will empower the patients," perceived to be in profound disagreement (P=.036 and P<.001, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: Despite the firm agreement among participants and experts regarding the impact of digitization on the health care system, physicians demonstrated a more negative attitude. We assume that this might be a factor contributing to the slow adoption of digitization in practice. Physicians might be struggling with changing power structures, so future measures to transform the market should involve them to a larger degree. ©Arne Hansen, Maximilian Herrmann, Jan P Ehlers, Thomas Mondritzki, Kai Oliver Hensel, Hubert Truebel, Philip Boehme. Originally published in JMIR Public Health and Surveillance (http://publichealth.jmir.org), 28.10.2019.

Entities:  

Keywords:  delivery of health care; diffusion of innovation; digitization; health care sector; mixed method; reform; transformation

Year:  2019        PMID: 31661082     DOI: 10.2196/14689

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JMIR Public Health Surveill        ISSN: 2369-2960


  10 in total

1.  Telemedicine consultations with physicians in Swedish primary care: a mixed methods study of users' experiences and care patterns.

Authors:  Felicia Gabrielsson-Järhult; Sofia Kjellström; Kristina Areskoug Josefsson
Journal:  Scand J Prim Health Care       Date:  2021-05-11       Impact factor: 2.581

2.  Training strategies for a sustainable medical care: a survey among assistant and chief physicians in a tertiary care hospital in Germany.

Authors:  Juliane Kröplin; Eike-Ulrike Zauner; Hauke Dopp; Anke Forberger; Gerhard Schön; Reinhard Bschorer; Oliver Heese; Jörg-Peter Ritz
Journal:  Innov Surg Sci       Date:  2020-12-21

3.  Database Supported Long-term Management of Chronic Diseases - Data from the German Disease Management Programmes as a Source for Continuing Medical Education.

Authors:  Bernd Hagen
Journal:  J Eur CME       Date:  2021-12-19

4.  Continuing Professional Development (CPD) within the Workplace in a Digitised Health-Care System: The Perspective from a German Professional Union.

Authors:  Reinhard Griebenow; Hans-Albert Gehle; Henrik Herrmann
Journal:  J Eur CME       Date:  2022-03-15

5.  Medical Students' Perceptions towards Digitization and Artificial Intelligence: A Mixed-Methods Study.

Authors:  Adrian Gillissen; Tonja Kochanek; Michaela Zupanic; Jan Ehlers
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-13

6.  Attitudes and perception of artificial intelligence in healthcare: A cross-sectional survey among patients.

Authors:  Sebastian J Fritsch; Andrea Blankenheim; Alina Wahl; Petra Hetfeld; Oliver Maassen; Saskia Deffge; Julian Kunze; Rolf Rossaint; Morris Riedel; Gernot Marx; Johannes Bickenbach
Journal:  Digit Health       Date:  2022-08-08

7.  Healthcare Providers' Knowledge of Value-Based Care in Germany: An Adapted, Mixed-Methods Approach.

Authors:  Axel Kuck; Kristian Kinscher; Leonard Fehring; Helmut Hildebrandt; Johannes Doerner; Jonas Lange; Hubert Truebel; Philip Boehme; Celina Bade; Thomas Mondritzki
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-07-11       Impact factor: 4.614

8.  Digitalization in Medicine: Are German Medical Students Well Prepared for the Future?

Authors:  Heiko Sorg; Jan P Ehlers; Christian G G Sorg
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-07-07       Impact factor: 4.614

9.  Acceptance of Telerheumatology by Rheumatologists and General Practitioners in Germany: Nationwide Cross-sectional Survey Study.

Authors:  Felix Muehlensiepen; Johannes Knitza; Wenke Marquardt; Jennifer Engler; Axel Hueber; Martin Welcker
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2021-03-29       Impact factor: 5.428

10.  Perspective of German medical faculties on digitization in the healthcare sector and its influence on the curriculum.

Authors:  Maximilian Neumann; Leonard Fehring; Kristian Kinscher; Hubert Truebel; Florian Dahlhausen; Jan P Ehlers; Thomas Mondritzki; Philip Boehme
Journal:  GMS J Med Educ       Date:  2021-11-15
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.