Literature DB >> 31660783

Moving Stroke Rehabilitation Research Evidence into Clinical Practice: Consensus-Based Core Recommendations From the Stroke Recovery and Rehabilitation Roundtable.

Janice J Eng1, Marie-Louise Bird1,2, Erin Godecke3, Tammy C Hoffmann4, Carole Laurin5, Olumide A Olaoye6, John Solomon7, Robert Teasell8, Caroline L Watkins9, Marion F Walker10.   

Abstract

Moving research evidence to practice can take years, if not decades, which denies stroke patients and families from receiving the best care. We present the results of an international consensus process prioritizing what research evidence to implement into stroke rehabilitation practice to have maximal impact. An international 10-member Knowledge Translation Working Group collaborated over a six-month period via videoconferences and a two-day face-to-face meeting. The process was informed from surveys received from 112 consumers/family members and 502 health care providers in over 28 countries, as well as from an international advisory of 20 representatives from 13 countries. From this consensus process, five of the nine identified priorities relate to service delivery (interdisciplinary care, screening and assessment, clinical practice guidelines, intensity, family support) and are generally feasible to implement or improve upon today. Readily available website resources are identified to help health care providers harness the necessary means to implement existing knowledge and solutions to improve service delivery. The remaining four priorities relate to system issues (access to services, transitions in care) and resources (equipment/technology, staffing) and are acknowledged to be more difficult to implement. We recommend that health care providers, managers, and organizations determine whether the priorities we identified are gaps in their local practice, and if so, consider implementation solutions to address them to improve the quality of lives of people living with stroke.

Entities:  

Keywords:  consensus; implementation; knowledge translation; recovery; rehabilitation; stroke

Year:  2019        PMID: 31660783     DOI: 10.1177/1545968319886485

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair        ISSN: 1545-9683            Impact factor:   3.919


  3 in total

1.  Evaluating the impact of a training program to support transitioning from the hospital to the community for people after stroke: a community case study.

Authors:  Michelle Lui; Katherine McKellar; Shari Cooper; Janice J Eng; Marie-Louise Bird
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2022-01-05       Impact factor: 2.655

2.  Effectiveness of Rehabilitation Nursing versus Usual Therapist-Led Treatment in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Randomized Non-Inferiority Trial.

Authors:  Jianmiao Wang; Yuping Zhang; Yuanyuan Chen; Mei Li; Hongyan Yang; Jinhua Chen; Qiaomin Tang; Jingfen Jin
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2021-06-21       Impact factor: 4.458

3.  Implementation of evidence-based assessment of upper extremity in stroke rehabilitation: From evidence to clinical practice.

Authors:  Margit Alt Murphy; Ann Björkdahl; Gunilla Forsberg-Wärleby; Carina U Persson
Journal:  J Rehabil Med       Date:  2021-01-29       Impact factor: 2.912

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.