BACKGROUND: Despite long clinical experience some authorities recommend against the use of aspirin for perioperative VTE prophylaxis and favour alternatives such as dabigatran. A change from Dabigatran to an Aspirin based protocol in a British district general hospital created the conditions of a natural experiment. METHODS: We conducted a single centre, retrospective study of 6-months using a dabigatran based protocol (THA n = 191, TKA n = 155) and 6-months using and aspirin based protocol (THA n = 165, TKA n = 136). Outcomes addressed include: VTE used, VTE events within 90-days, 30-day return to theatre (RTT) rates, and 90-day mortality. RESULTS: Pre-intervention, the dabigatran prescription rate was 73% (n = 139) and 78% (n = 123) with aspirin prescription post-intervention in 67% (n = 110) and 70% (n = 90) for THA and TKA respectively. We found a similar VTE rate when comparing dabigatran and aspirin groups for THA (2.2% vs. 0%, p = 0.17) and TKA (0.64% vs. 0%, p = 0.32). Similarly, no difference in the RTT rate was seen for THA (0.7% vs.2.7%, p = 0.23) or TKA (1.6% vs. 3.2%, p = 0.38). CONCLUSION: No significant differences in safety were found comparing aspirin to dabigatran for VTE prophylaxis for lower limb arthroplasty which, has not been previously reported and represents significant cost saving implications. Crown
BACKGROUND: Despite long clinical experience some authorities recommend against the use of aspirin for perioperative VTE prophylaxis and favour alternatives such as dabigatran. A change from Dabigatran to an Aspirin based protocol in a British district general hospital created the conditions of a natural experiment. METHODS: We conducted a single centre, retrospective study of 6-months using a dabigatran based protocol (THA n = 191, TKA n = 155) and 6-months using and aspirin based protocol (THA n = 165, TKA n = 136). Outcomes addressed include: VTE used, VTE events within 90-days, 30-day return to theatre (RTT) rates, and 90-day mortality. RESULTS: Pre-intervention, the dabigatran prescription rate was 73% (n = 139) and 78% (n = 123) with aspirin prescription post-intervention in 67% (n = 110) and 70% (n = 90) for THA and TKA respectively. We found a similar VTE rate when comparing dabigatran and aspirin groups for THA (2.2% vs. 0%, p = 0.17) and TKA (0.64% vs. 0%, p = 0.32). Similarly, no difference in the RTT rate was seen for THA (0.7% vs.2.7%, p = 0.23) or TKA (1.6% vs. 3.2%, p = 0.38). CONCLUSION: No significant differences in safety were found comparing aspirin to dabigatran for VTE prophylaxis for lower limb arthroplasty which, has not been previously reported and represents significant cost saving implications. Crown
Authors: Frederick A Anderson; Wei Huang; Richard J Friedman; Louis M Kwong; Jay R Lieberman; Vincent D Pellegrini Journal: J Arthroplasty Date: 2011-10-27 Impact factor: 4.757
Authors: Yngve Falck-Ytter; Charles W Francis; Norman A Johanson; Catherine Curley; Ola E Dahl; Sam Schulman; Thomas L Ortel; Stephen G Pauker; Clifford W Colwell Journal: Chest Date: 2012-02 Impact factor: 9.410
Authors: Alexander L Aquilina; Luke R Brunton; Michael R Whitehouse; Niall Sullivan; Ashley W Blom Journal: Hip Int Date: 2012 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 2.135
Authors: B I Eriksson; O E Dahl; N Rosencher; A A Kurth; C N van Dijk; S P Frostick; P Kälebo; A V Christiansen; S Hantel; R Hettiarachchi; J Schnee; H R Büller Journal: J Thromb Haemost Date: 2007-11 Impact factor: 5.824
Authors: Bengt I Eriksson; Ola E Dahl; Nadia Rosencher; Andreas A Kurth; C Niek van Dijk; Simon P Frostick; Martin H Prins; Rohan Hettiarachchi; Stefan Hantel; Janet Schnee; Harry R Büller Journal: Lancet Date: 2007-09-15 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: D Culliford; J Maskell; A Judge; C Cooper; D Prieto-Alhambra; N K Arden Journal: Osteoarthritis Cartilage Date: 2015-01-09 Impact factor: 6.576