| Literature DB >> 31659534 |
Avinash A Adsul1, Jaykumar J Chavan2, Nikhil B Gaikwad3, Rajaram V Gurav3, Ghansham B Dixit3, Shrirang R Yadav3.
Abstract
The study aimed to develop an efficient, rapid, and large-scale in vitro regeneration system for propagation, conservation, and restoration of an endemic and critically endangered herb, Ceropegia mohanramii. The cultures were established using nodal explants on Murashige and Skoog's (MS) medium supplemented with 6-benzylaminopurine (BAP: 1.0 mg/l). Nodal buds cultured on MS medium supplemented with BAP (2.0 mg/l) along with indole-3-butyric acid (IBA, 0.5 mg/l) resulted with production of maximum number of shoots (17.1 ± 1.2) in hundred percent of the cultures. MS medium supplemented with BAP (2.0 mg/l) along with diverse concentrations of indole-3acetic acid (IAA) promoted the in vitro flowering. In vitro regenerated shoots were transferred to one-half MS medium fortified with singular supplementation of auxins, where IBA (1.5 mg/l) served optimal for production of maximum number of roots (5.7 ± 0.6). In vitro derived plantlets were hardened under controlled conditions in a glasshouse and subsequently transferred to soil. Over 1200 saplings were transplanted to eight different localities of the Western Ghats where over 76% survival is recorded after 1 year of transplantation.Entities:
Keywords: Ceropegia mohanramii; Conservation; Endangered; Endemic; Micropropagation; Ornamental; Restoration
Year: 2019 PMID: 31659534 PMCID: PMC6821145 DOI: 10.1186/s43141-019-0003-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Genet Eng Biotechnol ISSN: 1687-157X
Efficiency of different cytokinins and auxins on shoot proliferation and in vitro rooting of C. mohanramii
| Sr. no. | Plant growth regulator (mg/l) | Response (%) | No. of shoots ± SE | No. of roots ± SE | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BAP | TDZ | IBA | IAA | ||||
| 1 | PGR free | 00 | 00 | – | |||
| 2 | 1.0 | – | – | – | 65 | 1.3 ± 0.3ns | – |
| 3 | 2.0 | – | – | – | 90 | 6.1 ± 0.3** | – |
| 4 | 3.0 | – | – | – | 90 | 4.4 ± 0.6** | – |
| 5 | 4.0 | – | – | – | 75 | 4.0 ± 0.6** | – |
| 6 | – | 1.0 | – | – | 60 | 1.5 ± 02ns | – |
| 7 | – | 2.0 | – | – | 75 | 3.2 ± 0.5* | – |
| 8 | – | 3.0 | – | – | 70 | 2.0 ± 0.4* | – |
| 9 | – | 4.0 | – | – | 65 | 1.3 ± 0.4ns | – |
| 10 | – | – | 0.5 | – | 85 | – | 2.0 ± 0.4* |
| 11 | – | – | 1.0 | – | 85 | – | 2.2 ± 0.4* |
| 12 | – | – | 1.5 | – | 95 | – | 5.7 ± 0.6** |
| 13 | – | – | 2.0 | – | 80 | – | 3.8 ± 0.3** |
| 14 | – | – | – | 0.5 | 75 | – | 3.5 ± 0.2** |
| 15 | – | – | – | 1.0 | 65 | – | 3.0 ± 0.6* |
| 16 | – | – | – | 1.5 | 60 | – | 2.1 ± 0.8* |
| 17 | – | – | – | 2.0 | 60 | – | 2.0 ± 0.2* |
| 18 | 2.0 | – | 0.5 | – | 100 | 17.1 ± 1.2** | – |
| 19 | 2.0 | – | 1.0 | – | 95 | 10.2 ± 0.6** | – |
| 20 | 2.0 | – | 1.5 | – | 95 | 10.2 ± 0.3** | – |
| 21 | 2.0 | – | 2.0 | – | 80 | 4.2 ± 0.6** | – |
| 22 | 2.0 | – | – | 0.5 | 75 | 4.5 ± 0.2** | – |
| 23 | 2.0 | – | – | 1.0 | 80 | 5.3 ± 0.5** | – |
| 24 | 2.0 | – | – | 1.5 | 85 | 4.1 ± 0.9** | – |
| 25 | 2.0 | – | – | 2.0 | 80 | 4.0 ± 0.5** | – |
Mean ± S.E. of 20 replicates per treatment. Values are significantly different when compared by Dunnett multiple comparison test (ns non-significant, *P < 0.05 and **P < 0.01)
Fig. 1Micropropagation of C. mohanramii. a Shoot initiation (MS + BAP 1.0 mg/l). b, c Shoot multiplication (MS + BAP 2.0 + IBA 0.5 mg/l). d In vitro flowering (MS + BAP 2.0 + IAA 1.5 mg/l). e In vitro rooting (½ MS + IBA 1.5 mg/l). f Hardened plant
Fig. 2Reintroduction of micropropagated plantlets into natural localities. a, b Large-scale hardening. c Reintroduced plantlets. d Regeneration in natural habitat
Reintroduction profile of micropropagated plantlets of C. mohanramii at different localities of the Western Ghats
| Sr. no. | Name of the locality | GPS readings | No. of saplings transferred | No. of saplings survived | Survival rate (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. | Gijkada, (Radhanagari WLS) | N 16, 19.304′ E 73, 52.786′ | 160 | 113 | 70.6 |
| 2. | Guhagar | N 17, 13.663′ E 73, 24.823′ | 130 | 75 | 57.6 |
| 3. | Pochari | N 17, 09.570′ E 73, 27.045′ | 80 | 69 | 86.2 |
| 4. | Ratnagiri | N 16, 56.122′ E 73, 18.203′ | 80 | 61 | 76.2 |
| 5. | Pavas | N 16, 52.826′ E 73, 19.649′ | 140 | 121 | 86.4 |
| 6. | Ganpatipule I | N 17, 07.135′ E 73, 16.602′ | 145 | 100 | 68.9 |
| 7. | Ganpatipule II | N 17, 07.34′ E 73, 16′ 31.02″ | 268 | 194 | 72.3 |
| 8. | Shiroda | N 15, 55′ 52.02″ E 75, 43′ 25.32″ | 210 | 187 | 89.0 |
| Total | 1213 | 920 | 76.6 | ||