Literature DB >> 31659465

Dataset characteristics influence the performance of different interpolation methods for soil salinity spatial mapping.

Mahmood Fazeli Sangani1, Davood Namdar Khojasteh2, Gary Owens3.   

Abstract

This study compared the performance of different interpolation methods for mapping soil salinity of three different agricultural fields having the same land use but different dataset characteristics. Four common spatial interpolation methods including global polynomial interpolation (GPI), inverse distance weighted (IDW), ordinary kriging (OK), and radial basis functions (RBF) were employed for mapping soil EC. The performance of interpolation methods in predicting soil EC was evaluated based on mean bias error, root mean square error, mean absolute percentage error, and coefficient of determinations criteria. Results showed that dataset characteristics, including central tendency and distribution, were significantly different among the studied fields. Experimental semivariogram and fitted model parameters indicated that three studied fields were also different in their spatial dependence strength. Considering all of the performance assessment measures used, the best interpolation method for fields A and C was OK and IDW for field B. The performance of interpolation methods was found to be affected by data characteristics of the studied fields, which were mostly ascribed to management practices. This study suggests in order to obtain accurate mapping of soil salinity in agricultural fields, it is essential to first find the best spatial interpolation method compatible with the characteristics of the collected data from the selected agricultural land.

Keywords:  Deterministic method; Geostatistics; Interpolation; Northern plains of Varamin city

Year:  2019        PMID: 31659465     DOI: 10.1007/s10661-019-7844-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Monit Assess        ISSN: 0167-6369            Impact factor:   2.513


  5 in total

1.  Spatial distribution of soil heavy metal pollution estimated by different interpolation methods: accuracy and uncertainty analysis.

Authors:  Yunfeng Xie; Tong-bin Chen; Mei Lei; Jun Yang; Qing-jun Guo; Bo Song; Xiao-yong Zhou
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2010-10-20       Impact factor: 7.086

Review 2.  The threat of soil salinity: A European scale review.

Authors:  I N Daliakopoulos; I K Tsanis; A Koutroulis; N N Kourgialas; A E Varouchakis; G P Karatzas; C J Ritsema
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2016-08-31       Impact factor: 7.963

3.  Geostatistical interpolation model selection based on ArcGIS and spatio-temporal variability analysis of groundwater level in piedmont plains, northwest China.

Authors:  Yong Xiao; Xiaomin Gu; Shiyang Yin; Jingli Shao; Yali Cui; Qiulan Zhang; Yong Niu
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2016-04-11

4.  Comparison of four spatial interpolation methods for estimating soil moisture in a complex terrain catchment.

Authors:  Xueling Yao; Bojie Fu; Yihe Lü; Feixiang Sun; Shuai Wang; Min Liu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-23       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic.

Authors:  Mary L McHugh
Journal:  Biochem Med (Zagreb)       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 2.313

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.