Literature DB >> 31659464

Laser fibre, rather than the stone, may harm the scope: retrospective monocentric analysis of 26 pre- and intraoperative factors of flexible ureteroscope (fURS) damage.

Tomasz Ozimek1, Jens Cordes1, Nils Gilbert1, Marie C Hupe1, Judith R Wiessmeyer1, Michael H Schneider1, Axel S Merseburger1, Mario Wolfgang Kramer2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The increasing number of flexible ureteroscopy procedures, the fragility of devices and their repair costs are a burden for urological departments worldwide. The objective was to investigate the impact of 26 pre- and intraoperative factors on reusable flexible ureteroscope (fURS) damage.
METHODS: All procedures were conducted with reusable fURS: Karl Storz Flex-X2 or Olympus URF-V. Statistical analysis was performed in RStudio (1.0.136) with Chi-square test and Mann-Whitney U tests (MWU).
RESULTS: In total, 416 flexible ureteroscopies, performed between September 2013 and June 2017, were analysed. 283 (68.03%) of these were for kidney stone surgery, and 133 (31.97%) for diagnostic purposes. In total, 39 (9.38%) devices were postoperatively deemed defective. The application of reusable laser fibre through fURS was more common in cases with documented defects [17/39 (43.59%) vs. 102/377 (27.06%), p = 0.047]. Other factors such as application of nitinol basket, biopsy via fURS, insertion of access sheath (UAS), as well as stone burden [median kidney stone maximal diameter: 6 mm (min 2.0; max 30.0) vs. 6 mm (min 1.0 vs. max 30.0)] showed no influence on fURS damage rate (p > 0.05). The infundibulopelvic angle (IPA) was steeper in cases with fURS damage as compared to cases without damage [median 44.0° (min 20.0; max 81.0) vs. 55.0 (min 7.0; max 122.0), p < 0.001].
CONCLUSIONS: Application of laser fibre via fURS can be considered as a risk factor of fURS damage. Stone burden, as well as the usage of not-sharp ended devices as nitinol baskets or forceps, is primarily not responsible for fURS damage.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Damage; Flexible ureteroscopy; Infundibulopelvic angle; Laser fibre

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31659464     DOI: 10.1007/s00345-019-02988-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Urol        ISSN: 0724-4983            Impact factor:   4.226


  3 in total

1.  The dilemma of 12/14F ureteral access sheath (UAS) usage: a case control study.

Authors:  Tomasz Ozimek; Judith R Wiessmeyer; Julian P Struck; Marie C Roesch; Nils Gilbert; Jan M Laturnus; Axel S Merseburger; Mario W Kramer
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2022-06-15       Impact factor: 2.090

2.  Durability of current generation flexible ureteroscopes: the experience from a high-volume centre.

Authors:  Chandra Mohan Vaddi; Paidakula Ramakrishna; Soundarya Ganesan; Siddalinga Swamy; Hemnath Anandan; Manas Babu
Journal:  Cent European J Urol       Date:  2022-05-20

3.  Comparative analysis of retrograde intrarenal surgery and modified ultra-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy in management of lower pole renal stones (1.5-3.5 cm).

Authors:  Zhuohang Li; Cong Lai; Arvind K Shah; Weibin Xie; Cheng Liu; Li Huang; Kuiqing Li; Hao Yu; Kewei Xu
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2020-03-16       Impact factor: 2.264

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.