Hongling Qu1, Yuli Huang2, Shufen Zhao3, Yuanqing Zhou1, Weibiao Lv4. 1. Department of Clinical Laboratory, Shunde Hospital, Southern Medical University (The First People's Hospital of Shunde), Foshan, 528300, Guangdong, People's Republic of China. 2. Department of Cardiology, Shunde Hospital, Southern Medical University (The First People's Hospital of Shunde), Foshan, Guangdong, People's Republic of China. 3. Department of Radiation Oncology, Shunde Hospital, Southern Medical University (The First People's Hospital of Shunde), Foshan, Guangdong, People's Republic of China. 4. Department of Clinical Laboratory, Shunde Hospital, Southern Medical University (The First People's Hospital of Shunde), Foshan, 528300, Guangdong, People's Republic of China. weibiao2004@163.com.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Plasma levels of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) DNA have been employed to predict survival outcomes of patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). However, the prognostic value of subsequent EBV DNA levels (mid or post treatment) for NPC is needed to identify by a large cohort of patients. We performed a meta-analysis of studies including data from 8128 patients to evaluate the prognostic value of EBV DNA in NPC patients. METHODS: We searched PubMed, Web of Science, and the Cochrane library for prospective and retrospective studies. Hazard ratios (HRs) and confidence intervals (CIs) were extracted from the studies or calculated and pooled to assess the association between EBV DNA levels pre-treatment (pre-DNA), mid-treatment (mid-DNA), and post-treatment (post-DNA) on clinical outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 22 studies with 8128 patients was included for analysis. Pre-DNA levels predicted overall survival, progression-free survival, distant metastasis-free survival, and local-regional failure survival with HRs (95% CIs) of 2.70 (2.06, 3.54), 2.70 (2.12, 3.44), 3.49 (2.35, 5.17), and 2.00 (1.45, 2.76), respectively, and the corresponding HRs for post-DNA levels were 4.86 (3.30, 7.17), 6.29 (3.41, 11.60), 5.68 (2.71,11.93), respectively. Mid-DNA levels predicted overall survival and progression-free survival with an HR (95% CI) of 3.02 (1.54, 5.29) and 3.15 (2.05, 4.83). Subgroup analysis showed that the HR of post-DNA wasn't influenced by different detection time of post-DNA (P = 0.22, I2 = 33.2%). CONCLUSION: The EBV DNA levels have a significant prognostic impact in patients with NPC. The effect of post-treatment EBV DNA level dominated that of pre-DNA and mid-DNA levels.
BACKGROUND: Plasma levels of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) DNA have been employed to predict survival outcomes of patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). However, the prognostic value of subsequent EBV DNA levels (mid or post treatment) for NPC is needed to identify by a large cohort of patients. We performed a meta-analysis of studies including data from 8128 patients to evaluate the prognostic value of EBV DNA in NPCpatients. METHODS: We searched PubMed, Web of Science, and the Cochrane library for prospective and retrospective studies. Hazard ratios (HRs) and confidence intervals (CIs) were extracted from the studies or calculated and pooled to assess the association between EBV DNA levels pre-treatment (pre-DNA), mid-treatment (mid-DNA), and post-treatment (post-DNA) on clinical outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 22 studies with 8128 patients was included for analysis. Pre-DNA levels predicted overall survival, progression-free survival, distant metastasis-free survival, and local-regional failure survival with HRs (95% CIs) of 2.70 (2.06, 3.54), 2.70 (2.12, 3.44), 3.49 (2.35, 5.17), and 2.00 (1.45, 2.76), respectively, and the corresponding HRs for post-DNA levels were 4.86 (3.30, 7.17), 6.29 (3.41, 11.60), 5.68 (2.71,11.93), respectively. Mid-DNA levels predicted overall survival and progression-free survival with an HR (95% CI) of 3.02 (1.54, 5.29) and 3.15 (2.05, 4.83). Subgroup analysis showed that the HR of post-DNA wasn't influenced by different detection time of post-DNA (P = 0.22, I2 = 33.2%). CONCLUSION: The EBV DNA levels have a significant prognostic impact in patients with NPC. The effect of post-treatment EBV DNA level dominated that of pre-DNA and mid-DNA levels.