Literature DB >> 31659071

Comparison of Urine and Plasma Biomarker Concentrations Measured by Aptamer-Based versus Immunoassay Methods in Cardiac Surgery Patients.

Lidiya Z Kukova1, Sherry G Mansour1, Steven G Coca2, Christina A de Fontnouvelle1, Heather R Thiessen-Philbrook3, Michael G Shlipak4, Joe M El-Khoury5, Chirag R Parikh6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Protein detection assays are invaluable tools in the field of biomarker discovery. However, only immunoassays are widely used and can measure 10-20 analytes per biosample. The novel SOMAmer-based assay uses nucleotide aptamer technology to measure over 1300 analytes per biosample. We compared the SOMAmer-based platform to traditional approaches to quantify analytes in a clinical setting with paired samples before and after cardiac surgery.
METHODS: In a substudy of the Translational Research Investigating Biomarker Endpoints in Acute Kidney Injury cohort, 54 individuals with acute kidney injury after cardiac surgery were identified. Preoperative and postoperative plasma and urine samples that had been previously evaluated for biomarker concentrations via immunoassays were analyzed via SOMAmer-based assay.
RESULTS: Spearman correlations were estimated when >50% of biomarker values were within detectable ranges by immunoassay (plasma biomarkers: preoperative, 26/33; postoperative, 31/33; urine biomarkers: preoperative, 13/16; postoperative, 16/16). Overall, 27% of reportable plasma preoperative biomarkers displayed correlations ≥0.75 between immunoassay and SOMAmer measurements; 23% displayed correlations of 0.50-0.75, and 50% displayed correlations <0.50. In urine these values were 15%, 39%, and 46%, respectively. Forty-two percent of reportable plasma postoperative biomarkers displayed correlations ≥0.75, 16% displayed correlations 0.50-0.75, and 42% displayed correlations <0.50. In urine, these values were 19%, 25%, and 56%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: In cardiac surgery patients, the SOMAmer-based assay detects proteins with moderate to strong correlation to current immunoassay methods. The correlations in urine are weaker than those in plasma. SOMAmer-based assay technology should be further evaluated in multiple settings as a high-throughput screening tool for biomarker discovery.
© 2019 American Association for Clinical Chemistry.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31659071     DOI: 10.1373/jalm.2018.028621

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Lab Med        ISSN: 2475-7241


  7 in total

1.  Comparative Analysis of Alzheimer's Disease Cerebrospinal Fluid Biomarkers Measurement by Multiplex SOMAscan Platform and Immunoassay-Based Approach.

Authors:  Jigyasha Timsina; Duber Gomez-Fonseca; Lihua Wang; Anh Do; Dan Western; Ignacio Alvarez; Miquel Aguilar; Pau Pastor; Rachel L Henson; Elizabeth Herries; Chengjie Xiong; Suzanne E Schindler; Anne M Fagan; Randall J Bateman; Martin Farlow; John C Morris; Richard Perrin; Krista Moulder; Jason Hassenstab; Jasmeer Chhatwal; Hiroshi Mori; Yun Ju Sung; Carlos Cruchaga
Journal:  J Alzheimers Dis       Date:  2022       Impact factor: 4.160

2.  Comparison of Aptamer-Based and Antibody-Based Assays for Protein Quantification in Chronic Kidney Disease.

Authors:  Carolina Lopez-Silva; Aditya Surapaneni; Josef Coresh; Jochen Reiser; Chirag R Parikh; Wassim Obeid; Morgan E Grams; Teresa K Chen
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2022-02-23       Impact factor: 10.614

Review 3.  Aptamers Targeting Cardiac Biomarkers as an Analytical Tool for the Diagnostics of Cardiovascular Diseases: A Review.

Authors:  Natalia Komarova; Olga Panova; Alexey Titov; Alexander Kuznetsov
Journal:  Biomedicines       Date:  2022-05-06

4.  Comparison of proteomic methods in evaluating biomarker-AKI associations in cardiac surgery patients.

Authors:  Richard X Liu; Heather R Thiessen-Philbrook; Ramachandran S Vasan; Josef Coresh; Peter Ganz; Joseph V Bonventre; Paul L Kimmel; Chirag R Parikh
Journal:  Transl Res       Date:  2021-07-31       Impact factor: 7.012

Review 5.  Chemical Modification of Aptamers for Increased Binding Affinity in Diagnostic Applications: Current Status and Future Prospects.

Authors:  Jan P Elskens; Joke M Elskens; Annemieke Madder
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-06-25       Impact factor: 5.923

6.  Assessment of variability in the plasma 7k SomaScan proteomics assay.

Authors:  Julián Candia; Gulzar N Daya; Toshiko Tanaka; Luigi Ferrucci; Keenan A Walker
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-10-13       Impact factor: 4.996

Review 7.  Nucleic Acid Nanotechnology for Diagnostics and Therapeutics in Acute Kidney Injury.

Authors:  Yiwen Ying; Qian Tang; Da Han; Shan Mou
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-03-13       Impact factor: 5.923

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.