Adam M Leventhal1,2, Nicholas I Goldenson3, Junhan Cho3, Matthew G Kirkpatrick3, Rob S McConnell3, Matthew D Stone4, Raina D Pang3, Janet Audrain-McGovern5, Jessica L Barrington-Trimis3. 1. Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California; adam.leventhal@usc.edu. 2. Departments of Psychology and. 3. Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California. 4. Department of Family Medicine and Public Health, School of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California; and. 5. Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) are available in nontraditional flavors (eg, fruit and candy) that are banned in combustible cigarettes in the United States. Whether adolescent use of e-cigarettes in nontraditional flavors prospectively predicts continuation of vaping and progression to more frequent vaping is unknown. METHODS: High school students in Los Angeles, California, completed 5 semiannual surveys (2014-2017 [10th grade to 12th grade]). Among past-6-month e-cigarette users at survey waves 1 to 4 (N = 478), e-cigarette flavor (or flavors) used was coded into 2 mutually exclusive categories at each wave (use of ≥1 nontraditional flavors [fruit, candy, sweet or dessert, buttery, blends or combinations, and other] versus exclusive use of tobacco, menthol or mint, or flavorless). Flavor used during waves 1 to 4 was modeled as a time-varying, time-lagged regressor of vaping status and frequency outcomes 6 months later at waves 2 to 5. RESULTS: Across waves 1 to 4, there were 739 (93.8%) observations of nontraditional-flavor use and 49 (6.2%) observations of exclusive use of tobacco, mint or menthol, or flavorless e-cigarettes. Use of e-cigarettes in nontraditional flavors (versus only tobacco, mint or menthol, or flavorless) was positively associated with vaping continuation (64.3% vs 42.9%; adjusted odds ratio = 3.76 [95% confidence interval 1.20 to 10.31]) and past-30-day number of puffs per nicotine vaping episode (mean: 3.1 [SD 5.5] vs 1.5 [SD 3.8]; adjusted rate ratio = 2.41 [95% confidence interval 1.08 to 5.92]) 6 months later. Flavor used was not associated with the subsequent number of past-30-day vaping days or episodes per day. CONCLUSIONS: Adolescents who vaped e-cigarettes in nontraditional flavors, compared with those who exclusively vaped tobacco-flavored, mint- or menthol-flavored, or flavorless e-cigarettes, were more likely to continue vaping and take more puffs per vaping occasion 6 months later.
OBJECTIVES: Electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) are available in nontraditional flavors (eg, fruit and candy) that are banned in combustible cigarettes in the United States. Whether adolescent use of e-cigarettes in nontraditional flavors prospectively predicts continuation of vaping and progression to more frequent vaping is unknown. METHODS: High school students in Los Angeles, California, completed 5 semiannual surveys (2014-2017 [10th grade to 12th grade]). Among past-6-month e-cigarette users at survey waves 1 to 4 (N = 478), e-cigarette flavor (or flavors) used was coded into 2 mutually exclusive categories at each wave (use of ≥1 nontraditional flavors [fruit, candy, sweet or dessert, buttery, blends or combinations, and other] versus exclusive use of tobacco, menthol or mint, or flavorless). Flavor used during waves 1 to 4 was modeled as a time-varying, time-lagged regressor of vaping status and frequency outcomes 6 months later at waves 2 to 5. RESULTS: Across waves 1 to 4, there were 739 (93.8%) observations of nontraditional-flavor use and 49 (6.2%) observations of exclusive use of tobacco, mint or menthol, or flavorless e-cigarettes. Use of e-cigarettes in nontraditional flavors (versus only tobacco, mint or menthol, or flavorless) was positively associated with vaping continuation (64.3% vs 42.9%; adjusted odds ratio = 3.76 [95% confidence interval 1.20 to 10.31]) and past-30-day number of puffs per nicotine vaping episode (mean: 3.1 [SD 5.5] vs 1.5 [SD 3.8]; adjusted rate ratio = 2.41 [95% confidence interval 1.08 to 5.92]) 6 months later. Flavor used was not associated with the subsequent number of past-30-day vaping days or episodes per day. CONCLUSIONS: Adolescents who vaped e-cigarettes in nontraditional flavors, compared with those who exclusively vaped tobacco-flavored, mint- or menthol-flavored, or flavorless e-cigarettes, were more likely to continue vaping and take more puffs per vaping occasion 6 months later.
Authors: Allison C Hoffman; Raydel Valdes Salgado; Carolyn Dresler; Rachel Williams Faller; Christopher Bartlett Journal: Tob Control Date: 2016-09-15 Impact factor: 7.552
Authors: Kathleen R Case; Melissa B Harrell; Adriana Pérez; Alexandra Loukas; Anna V Wilkinson; Andrew E Springer; MeLisa R Creamer; Cheryl L Perry Journal: Addict Behav Date: 2017-05-12 Impact factor: 3.913
Authors: Adam M Leventhal; David R Strong; Matthew G Kirkpatrick; Jennifer B Unger; Steve Sussman; Nathaniel R Riggs; Matthew D Stone; Rubin Khoddam; Jonathan M Samet; Janet Audrain-McGovern Journal: JAMA Date: 2015-08-18 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Nicholas I Goldenson; Matthew G Kirkpatrick; Jessica L Barrington-Trimis; Raina D Pang; Julia F McBeth; Mary Ann Pentz; Jonathan M Samet; Adam M Leventhal Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2016-09-22 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: H Isabella Lanza; Adam M Leventhal; Junhan Cho; Jessica L Braymiller; Evan A Krueger; Rob McConnell; Jessica L Barrington-Trimis Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2020-08-28 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Lin Li; Ron Borland; Kenneth Michael Cummings; Geoffrey T Fong; Shannon Gravely; Danielle M Smith; Maciej L Goniewicz; Richard J O'Connor; Mary E Thompson; Ann McNeill Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2021-08-18 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Teresa W Wang; Andrea S Gentzke; Linda J Neff; Emily V Glidden; Ahmed Jamal; Eunice Park-Lee; Chunfeng Ren; Karen A Cullen; Brian A King; Karen A Hacker Journal: JAMA Netw Open Date: 2021-06-01
Authors: Kimberly G Wagoner; Jessica L King; Amir Alexander; Hollie L Tripp; Erin L Sutfin Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-05-01 Impact factor: 3.390