Simon R Heller1, John B Buse2, Robert Ratner3, Elizabeth Seaquist4, Lars Bardtrum5, Charlotte Thim Hansen5, Deniz Tutkunkardas5, Alan C Moses6. 1. Academic Unit of Diabetes, Oncology & Metabolism, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, U.K. s.heller@sheffield.ac.uk. 2. University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC. 3. Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Georgetown University Medical School, Washington, DC. 4. Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN. 5. Novo Nordisk A/S, Søborg, Denmark. 6. Novo Nordisk Inc., Plainsboro, NJ.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine if the International Hypoglycaemia Study Group (IHSG) level 2 low glucose definition can identify clinically relevant hypoglycemia in clinical trials and offer value as an end point for future trials. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A post hoc analysis was performed of the SWITCH (SWITCH 1: n = 501, type 1 diabetes; SWITCH 2: n = 721, type 2 diabetes) and DEVOTE (n = 7,637, type 2 diabetes) trials utilizing the IHSG low glucose definitions. Patients in all trials were randomized to either insulin degludec or insulin glargine 100 units/mL. In the main analysis, the following definitions were compared: 1) American Diabetes Association (ADA) 2005 (plasma glucose [PG] confirmed ≤3.9 mmol/L with symptoms); and 2) IHSG level 2 (PG confirmed <3.0 mmol/L, independent of symptoms). RESULTS: In SWITCH 2, the estimated rate ratios of hypoglycemic events indicated increasing differences between treatments with decreasing PG levels until 3.0 mmol/L, following which no additional treatment differences were observed. Similar results were observed for the SWITCH 1 trial. In SWITCH 2, the IHSG level 2 definition produced a rate ratio that was lower than the ADA 2005 definition. CONCLUSIONS: The IHSG level 2 definition was validated in a series of clinical trials, demonstrating its ability to discriminate between basal insulins. This definition is therefore recommended to be uniformly adopted by regulatory bodies and used in future clinical trials.
OBJECTIVE: To determine if the International Hypoglycaemia Study Group (IHSG) level 2 low glucose definition can identify clinically relevant hypoglycemia in clinical trials and offer value as an end point for future trials. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A post hoc analysis was performed of the SWITCH (SWITCH 1: n = 501, type 1 diabetes; SWITCH 2: n = 721, type 2 diabetes) and DEVOTE (n = 7,637, type 2 diabetes) trials utilizing the IHSG low glucose definitions. Patients in all trials were randomized to either insulin degludec or insulin glargine 100 units/mL. In the main analysis, the following definitions were compared: 1) American Diabetes Association (ADA) 2005 (plasma glucose [PG] confirmed ≤3.9 mmol/L with symptoms); and 2) IHSG level 2 (PG confirmed <3.0 mmol/L, independent of symptoms). RESULTS: In SWITCH 2, the estimated rate ratios of hypoglycemic events indicated increasing differences between treatments with decreasing PG levels until 3.0 mmol/L, following which no additional treatment differences were observed. Similar results were observed for the SWITCH 1 trial. In SWITCH 2, the IHSG level 2 definition produced a rate ratio that was lower than the ADA 2005 definition. CONCLUSIONS: The IHSG level 2 definition was validated in a series of clinical trials, demonstrating its ability to discriminate between basal insulins. This definition is therefore recommended to be uniformly adopted by regulatory bodies and used in future clinical trials.
Authors: Hertzel C Gerstein; Jackie Bosch; Gilles R Dagenais; Rafael Díaz; Hyejung Jung; Aldo P Maggioni; Janice Pogue; Jeffrey Probstfield; Ambady Ramachandran; Matthew C Riddle; Lars E Rydén; Salim Yusuf Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2012-06-11 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Steven P Marso; Darren K McGuire; Bernard Zinman; Neil R Poulter; Scott S Emerson; Thomas R Pieber; Richard E Pratley; Poul-Martin Haahr; Martin Lange; Kirstine Brown Frandsen; Rasmus Rabøl; John B Buse Journal: Am Heart J Date: 2016-06-18 Impact factor: 4.749
Authors: Robert T C E Robinson; Nigel D Harris; Robert H Ireland; Stuart Lee; Christopher Newman; Simon R Heller Journal: Diabetes Date: 2003-06 Impact factor: 9.461
Authors: Elaine Chow; Alan Bernjak; Emma Walkinshaw; Alexandra Lubina-Solomon; Jenny Freeman; Ian A Macdonald; Paul J Sheridan; Simon R Heller Journal: Diabetes Date: 2017-01-30 Impact factor: 9.461
Authors: Denise E Bonds; Michael E Miller; Richard M Bergenstal; John B Buse; Robert P Byington; Jeff A Cutler; R James Dudl; Faramarz Ismail-Beigi; Angela R Kimel; Byron Hoogwerf; Karen R Horowitz; Peter J Savage; Elizabeth R Seaquist; Debra L Simmons; William I Sivitz; Joann M Speril-Hillen; Mary Ellen Sweeney Journal: BMJ Date: 2010-01-08
Authors: B E de Galan; R J McCrimmon; M Ibberson; S R Heller; P Choudhary; F Pouwer; J Speight; J Carlton; T R Pieber; M Rosilio; C J Tack; M Müllenborn Journal: Diabet Med Date: 2020-02-05 Impact factor: 4.359