| Literature DB >> 31658787 |
Jie Liu1,2, Rongrong Wang3, Xinyu Wang4,5, Lvzhu Yang6,7, Yang Shan8, Qun Zhang9, Shenghua Ding10,11.
Abstract
The effects of high-pressure homogenization (HPH) on the structural, physical, and rheological properties of lily pulp (15%, w/w) were investigated. Different pressures ranging from 0 MPa to 100 MPa were used. The focus was on evaluating the changes in the particle size distribution (PSD), structure, pulp sedimentation behavior, serum cloudiness (SC), total soluble solids (TSS), color, and rheological behavior of the pulps. PSD analysis showed that the diameter of suspended lily particles significantly decreased with an increasing homogenization pressure. The suspended particles observed through optical microscopy became small after homogenization, highlighting the effect of HPH on disrupting the suspended particles. Compared with the untreated pulp, the SC and sedimentation velocity of the homogenized pulps decreased due to the disruption of the suspended particles. The effects of HPH on the sedimentation index and SC exhibited an asymptotic behavior similar to that of the changes in the particle size of lily pulp. Moreover, HPH processing reduced the viscosity of lily pulp and increased the TSS and lightness of the homogenized pulps. HPH significantly modified the structural, physical, and rheological properties of lily pulp. The pulp homogenized above 60 MPa had good suspension stability. This finding indicates that HPH technology can be used to improve the stability of lily pulp.Entities:
Keywords: high-pressure homogenization; lily pulp; physical properties; rheological properties
Year: 2019 PMID: 31658787 PMCID: PMC6835810 DOI: 10.3390/foods8100472
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Foods ISSN: 2304-8158
Figure 1Effect of high-pressure homogenization (NH = non-homogenized; 0–100 MPa) on particle size distribution (PSD) (a) and cumulative diameter percentiles (Dv10, Dv50, and Dv90) (b) of lily pulp. Dv10, Dv50, and Dv90 indicated that 10%, 50% or 90% of the particles fell below the specified diameter. Different letters in the column indicated that the samples were significantly different (p < 0.05).
Figure 2Effect of pressure of high-pressure homogenization on the microstructure of lily pulp. The scale bar shows 1000 μm.
Figure 3Macroscopic observations of NH (non-homogenized) sample and high-pressure homogenization (0–100 MPa) processed samples after 3, 6, and 12 d at 25 °C: (A) 100 MPa; (B) 80 MPa; (C) 60 MPa; (D) 40 MPa; (E) 20 MPa; (F) 0 MPa; (G) NH, and each capital letter (A to G) refers to a triplicate of tubes.
Figure 4Effect of high-pressure homogenization on the sedimentation index (IS) of lily pulp (20–100 MPa) during 30 days of storage at 25 °C: the dashed curves are the models described in Table 1.
Mathematical modeling of the sedimentation index (IS) of the homogenized lily pulp during 30 days of storage at 25 °C.
| Treatments | IS = ISequilibrium + (ISinitial − ISequilibrium)·e−k·t | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ISequilibrium | ISinitial | k |
| |
| 20 MPa | 28.00 | 64.09 | 0.77 | 0.95 |
| 40 MPa | 28.67 | 75.69 | 0.86 | 0.99 |
| 60 MPa | 32.33 | 44.91 | 0.38 | 0.98 |
| 80 MPa | 31.67 | 47.78 | 0.52 | 0.99 |
| 100 MPa | 33.33 | 62.97 | 0.78 | 0.99 |
IS in % and t in days.
Figure 5Effect of high-pressure homogenization on serum cloudiness (SC) of lily pulp (a) and the dashed curve is SC of the pulps was modeled as a function of homogenization pressure (b). Different letters in the column indicated that the samples were significantly different (p < 0.05).
Mathematical modeling of serum cloudiness (SC) as a function of the homogenized pressure (0–100 MPa) in lily pulp.
| Model | SC = SCequilibrium + (SCinitial − SCequilibrium)·e−k·p |
|---|---|
| SCequilibrium | 0.27 |
| SCinitial | 0.95 |
| K | 0.03 |
| R2 | 0.93 |
SC in % and p (pressure) in MPa.
Figure 6Effect of high-pressure homogenization on the total soluble solids (TSS) content of lily pulp. Different letters in the column indicate that the samples were significantly different (p < 0.05).
Mean (±SD) values of lightness (L*), redness (a*), yellowness (b*), and total color differences (ΔE) of the NH (non-homogenized) sample and high-pressure homogenization (0–100 MPa) processed lily pulps.
| Treatments |
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NH | 67.03 ± 0.19 c | −3.30 ± 0.03 ab | 2.48 ± 0.10 a | - |
| 0 MPa | 67.78 ± 0.26 b | −3.31 ± 0.03 ab | 2.02 ± 0.03 b | 0.88 ± 0.08 d |
| 20 MPa | 67.81 ± 0.28 b | −3.32 ± 0.04 bc | 1.99 ± 0.03 b | 0.92 ± 0.10 d |
| 40 MPa | 68.80 ± 0.27 a | −3.32 ± 0.02 bc | 1.53 ± 0.01 c | 2.01 ± 0.09 b |
| 60 MPa | 69.11 ± 0.16 a | −3.26 ± 0.02 a | 1.40 ± 0.04 de | 2.34 ± 0.05 a |
| 80 MPa | 68.60 ± 0.22 a | −3.38 ± 0.03 d | 1.51 ± 0.02 cd | 1.85 ± 0.06 c |
| 100 MPa | 68.67 ± 0.06 a | −3.37 ± 0.02 cd | 1.44 ± 0.05 d | 1.94 ± 0.01 bc |
Different letters in the same column indicate significant difference (p < 0.05) between treatments.
Figure 7Steady shear flow curves (σ × γ) of lily pulp treated by high pressure homogenization (0–100 MPa) and NH (non-homogenized) sample.
Herschel–Bulkley model parameters of the control and homogenized lily pulps (0–100 MPa, 25 °C).
| Treatments |
|
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NH | 0.772 ± 0.030 a | 0.088 ± 0.007 a | 0.826 ± 0.015 f | 0.996 |
| 0 MPa | 0.497 ± 0.011 b | 0.053 ± 0.004 b | 0.870 ± 0.014 e | 0.997 |
| 20 MPa | 0.234 ±0.008 c | 0.023 ± 0.002 c | 0.947 ± 0.017 d | 0.996 |
| 40 MPa | 0.218 ± 0.007 d | 0.019 ± 0.002 d | 0.972 ± 0.015 c | 0.997 |
| 60 MPa | 0.167 ± 0.007 e | 0.015 ± 0.001 e | 0.980 ± 0.017 b | 0.996 |
| 80 MPa | 0.142 ± 0.005 f | 0.013 ± 0.001 f | 0.984 ± 0.019 a | 0.995 |
| 100 MPa | 0.125 ± 0.006 g | 0.012 ± 0.001 f | 0.986 ± 0.017 a | 0.996 |
Different letters in the same column indicate significant difference (p < 0.05) between treatments.
Figure 8Apparent viscosity (η) of lily pulp treated by high-pressure homogenization (0–100 MPa) and NH (non-homogenized) sample.