| Literature DB >> 31658772 |
Luisa Biondi1, Cinzia L Randazzo2, Nunziatina Russo3, Alessandra Pino4, Antonio Natalello5, Koenraad Van Hoorde6,7, Cinzia Caggia8.
Abstract
Two extracts derived from plant material rich in hydrolysable (Tara, T; Caesalpinia spinosa) or condensed (Mimosa, M; Acacia mearnsii) tannins were added to lamb's diet and their effects on meat quality and on microbial population were evaluated; a diet without tannins represented the Control (C). Meat pH, vitamin E, intramuscular fat content and muscle fatty acid composition were determined. Oxidative stability and microbiological analyses were performed on meat samples after 0, 4 and 7 days of refrigerated storage. Psychrotrophic bacteria were identified through MALDI-TOF MS analysis. Regarding meat fatty acids, Tara treatment decreased the percentage of monounsaturated fatty acids. The counts of all microbial groups were similar among dietary treatments at day 0, while a significant reduction of microbial loads was observed in T-group at day 7. Pseudomonas fluorescens group count was significantly affected by T extract supplementation. The MALDI-TOF MS identification revealed the dominance of Pseudomonas fragi species in all samples while Pseudomonas lundensis, Brochothrix thermosphacta and Candida famata were revealed only in control ones. In conclusions, the tannin extract supplementation is a promising dietary strategy to preserve lamb meat quality.Entities:
Keywords: Pseudomonas spp.; condensed tannins; hydrolysable tannins; meat chemical composition; meat shelf-life; meat spoilage
Year: 2019 PMID: 31658772 PMCID: PMC6836261 DOI: 10.3390/foods8100469
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Foods ISSN: 2304-8158
Chemical composition of the basal diet.
| Basal Diet | |
|---|---|
| Dry matter (DM), g/100 g as-fed | 89.65 |
| Crude protein, g/100 g DM | 15.67 |
| Ether extract, g/100 g DM | 2.68 |
| Neutral detergent fibre, g/100 g DM | 30.36 |
| Acid detergent fibre, g/100 g DM | 15.97 |
| Acid detergent lignin, g/100 g DM | 3.62 |
| Ash, g/100 g DM | 7.01 |
| Total tocopherols, μg/g DM | 13.08 |
| α-Tocopherol, % of total tocopherols | 98.75 |
| γ-Tocopherol, % of total tocopherols | 1.16 |
| δ-tocopherol, % of total tocopherols | 0.08 |
| Fatty acids, g/kg DM | |
| 14:0 | 0.06 |
| 16:0 | 5.82 |
| 18:0 | 1.51 |
| 18:1 n-9 | 8.94 |
| 18:2 n-6 | 28.03 |
| 18:3 n-3 | 0.07 |
| 20:0 | 0.16 |
Effect of the dietary treatment 1 on meat quality parameters.
| Item 2 | C | T | M | SEM 3 | Diet Effect |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IMF3, g/100 g muscle | 2.19 | 1.15 | 1.87 | 0.135 | 0.136 |
| pH | 5.94 | 5.88 | 6.00 | 0.040 | 0.490 |
| α-Tocopherol, ng/g of muscle | 258 | 468 | 340 | 44.40 | 0.149 |
| γ-Tocopherol, ng/g of muscle | 1.82 b | 3.40 a | 1.83 | 0.278 | 0.013 |
| δ-Tocopherol, ng/g of muscle | 18.6 | 20.2 | 29.0 | 2.530 | 0.200 |
| Σ Tocopherols, ng/g of muscle | 278 | 492 | 371 | 46.00 | 0.167 |
| SFA, g/100g total FAME | 39.5 | 39.9 | 40.4 | 0.593 | 0.841 |
| MUFA, g/100g total FAME | 47.0 a | 41.4 b | 45.5 a | 0.840 | 0.006 |
| PUFA, g/100g total FAME | 10.3 | 15.6 | 10.9 | 1.120 | 0.093 |
1 C = concentrate-based diet; T and M mean C diet + 4% tannin extract from either Tara or Mimosa. 2 IMF = intramuscular fat; SFA = saturated fatty acids; MUFA = monounsaturated fatty acids; PUFA = polyunsaturated fatty acids; FAME = fatty acid methyl esters. 3 SEM = standard error of mean. a,b Within a row, different superscript letters indicate differences (p ≤ 0.05) between dietary treatments tested using the Tukey’s adjustment for multiple comparisons.
Effect of the dietary treatment and time of storage on the oxidative stability parameters of meat.
| Dietary Treatment (D) 1 | Time of Storage (T) 2 | SEM 3 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C | T | M | 0 | 4 | 7 | D | T | D × T | ||
| L* values | 42.5 | 42.9 | 41.7 | 40.8 b | 42.8 ab | 43.5 a | 0.455 | 0.750 | <0.001 | 0.029 |
| a* values | 12.5 | 12.7 | 12.2 | 13.9 a | 12.2 b | 11.3 b | 0.279 | 0.786 | <0.001 | 0.131 |
| b* values | 11.8 | 11.6 | 10.8 | 11.1 | 11.5 | 11.6 | 0.223 | 0.396 | 0.479 | 0.084 |
| C* values | 17.3 | 17.2 | 16.4 | 17.8 | 16.8 | 16.2 | 0.314 | 0.579 | 0.035 6 | 0.085 |
| H* values | 43.6 | 42.4 | 41.4 | 38.3 c | 43.2 b | 46.0 a | 0.602 | 0.225 | <0.001 | 0.945 |
| MetMb, % of Mb | 48.4 a | 46.0 ab | 43.8 b | 38.3 c | 48.3 b | 51.6 a | 1.02 | 0.048 | <0.001 | 0.499 |
| TBARS 5, mg/kg | 0.76 | 0.83 | 0.71 | 0.18 c | 0.64 b | 1.48 a | 0.106 | 0.857 | <0.001 | 0.884 |
1 C = concentrate-based diet; T and M mean C diet + 4% tannin extract from either Tara or Mimosa. 2 Time 0, 4, 7 = days of storage at 4 °C under aerobic conditions (raw meat slices) 3 SEM = standard error of mean. 4 p values for the effects of the dietary treatment (D), time of storage (T) and of the D × T interaction. 5 Lipid oxidation, measured as TBARS values. 6 No significant differences were found for multiple comparisons using Tukey’s method. a–c Within row, different superscript letters indicate differences (p < 0.05) between dietary treatments or times of storage tested using the Tukey’s adjustment for multiple comparisons.
Figure 1Effect of dietary treatment (Control (C), Tara (T) or Mimosa (M)) and time of storage (days 0, 4 and 7) on microbial counts expressed as log10 CFU/mL: (a) total mesophilic bacteria; (b) total psychrotrophic bacteria; (c) E. coli; (d) Enterobacteriaceae; (e) Pseudomonas spp. a–g: Values with different superscripts are significantly different (p ≤ 0.05).
Figure 2UPGMA (unweighted pair group method with arithmetic mean) dendrogram of the MALDI-TOF MS analyses of seventy-nine randomly selected meat samples. Node values indicate the average percentage of similarity based on MALDI-TOF MS profiles. The tree was made with BioNumerics version 5.1.
Figure 3Occurrence (percentage, %) of dominant spoilage species in meat samples.
Figure 4Occurrence (percentage, %) of dominant spoilage species in Tara (T), Mimosa (M) and Control (C) meat samples during the refrigerated storage.