| Literature DB >> 31658658 |
Juan A Jiménez-Tejada1, Adrián Romero2,3, Jesús González4, Nandu B Chaure5, Andrew N Cammidge6, Isabelle Chambrier7, Asim K Ray8, M Jamal Deen9,10.
Abstract
In this work, the topic of the detrimental contact effects in organic thin-film transistors (OTFTs) is revisited. In this case, contact effects are considered as a tool to enhance the characterization procedures of OTFTs, achieving more accurate values for the fundamental parameters of the transistor threshold voltage, carrier mobility and on-off current ratio. The contact region is also seen as a fundamental part of the device which is sensitive to physical, chemical and fabrication variables. A compact model for OTFTs, which includes the effects of the contacts, and a recent proposal of an associated evolutionary parameter extraction procedure are reviewed. Both the model and the procedure are used to assess the effect of the annealing temperature on a nickel-1,4,8,11,15,18,22,25-octakis(hexyl)phthalocyanine (NiPc6)-based OTFT. A review of the importance of phthalocyanines in organic electronics is also provided. The characterization of the contact region in NiPc6 OTFTs complements the results extracted from other physical-chemical techniques such as differential scanning calorimetry or atomic force microscopy, in which the transition from crystal to columnar mesophase imposes a limit for the optimum performance of the annealed OTFTs.Entities:
Keywords: contact effects; device parameters; evolutionary multi-objective optimization; modeling; nickel phthalocyanine; thin-film transistor
Year: 2019 PMID: 31658658 PMCID: PMC6843424 DOI: 10.3390/mi10100683
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Micromachines (Basel) ISSN: 2072-666X Impact factor: 2.891
Figure 1Phthalocyanine molecule.
Figure 2Differential scanning calorimetry of pristine powder for both heating (endothermic) and cooling (exothermic). The powder is collected from a spin-coated sample.
Figure 3Two-dimensional AFM micrographs of the surfaces of the thin films of : (A) as-prepared, prior to heat treatment; heat treatment during two hours at (B) 50 °C, (C) 100 °C and (D) 150 °C.
Parameters of the OTFTs.
| Parameter | Samples (Annealing Temperature, °C) | Extracted From | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| As-Prepared | 50 | 100 | 150 | ||
| Average particle size (μm) | 100 ± 10 | 200 ± 20 | 400 ± 20 | 1500 ± 100 | AFM data |
| Surface roughness (nm) | 1.52 | 17.80 | 42.62 | 65.19 | AFM data |
| μ0 (cm2/Vs) | 2.30 × 10−4 | 2.16 × 10−3 | 4.93 × 10−5 | 1.29 × 10−4 | (5), (18), (20) |
|
| 0.402 | 0.116 | 0.971 | 0.619 | (5), (18), (20) |
| 4.18 × 10−7 | 5.90 | 14.5 | 12.1 | (5), (18), (20) | |
| - | 6.91 | 13.1 | - | (10) | |
| α [A/V(mk+1+γ] | - | 1.08 × 10−10 | 1.81 × 10−12 | - | (10) |
| VSS (V) | −8.88 | −3.41 | −20.4 | −21.2 | (5), (18), (20) |
| mk | 1.98 | 1.10 | 1.64 | 2.00 | (5), (18), (20) |
| MC(−20 V) [A/Vmk] | 1.48 × 10−9 | 4.21 × 10−9 | 1.90 × 10−9 | 8.91 × 10−9 | (5), (18), (20) |
| MC(−30 V) [A/Vmk] | 1.04 × 10−9 | 6.38 × 10−9 | 2.80 × 10−9 | 4.47 × 10−8 | (5), (18), (20) |
| MC(−40 V) [A/Vmk] | 6.82 × 10−10 | 7.72 × 10−9 | 4.62 × 10−9 | 4.96 × 10−8 | (5), (18), (20) |
| MC(−50 V) [A/Vmk] | 6.46 × 10−10 | 1.00 × 10−8 | 6.48 × 10−9 | 5.70 × 10−8 | (5), (18), (20) |
Figure 4Output characteristics of organic thin-film transistors (OTFTs) at different annealing temperatures. (a–d) Comparison of experimental curves (symbols) and our calculations using Equations (5) and (18) (solid lines) at different annealing temperatures: (a) as-prepared; (b) 50 °C; (c) 100 °C; and (d) 150 °C. is swept from −20 (bottom) to −50 V (top) with a −10 V step. (e) Output characteristics at = −50 V of transistors annealed at different temperatures.
Figure 5Comparison of experimental (symbols) and calculated (solid lines) transfer characteristics at different drain voltages in OTFTs annealed at different temperatures: (a) = −6 V; (b) = −40 V. Note that the left side figures contain the same values as the right side figures, but with different scale (logarithmic and linear).
Figure 6Contact curves in OTFTs at different annealing temperatures. (a–d) Comparison of curves calculated with Equation (20) (symbols) and Equation (18) (solid lines) at different annealing temperatures: (a) as-prepared; (b) 50 °C; (c) 100 °C; and (d) 150 °C. (e) Comparison of curves calculated with Equation (20) (symbols) and Equation (18) (solid lines) at = −50 V and different annealing temperatures.
Figure 7Comparative study of the annealed devices. (a) On-off current ratio; (b) threshold voltage ; (c) γ values; (d) mobility evaluated at [ in ].
Figure 8Mobility calculated using Equation (2) for different values at different annealing temperatures.
Figure 9(a–d) Extracted values of (empty symbols) at different annealing temperatures. The solid lines show the trend that must follow for the Equations (5) and (18) to fit the experimental curves of Figure 5. In (b,c), the lines also follow the trend given in Equation (10). The black symbol drawn on the -axis of each figure represents the value of extracted with the evolutionary procedure.