Hermann Brenner1,2,3, Anton Gies2,4, Kevin Selby5. 1. Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany. 2. Division of Preventive Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany. 3. German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany. 4. Medical Faculty Heidelberg, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany. 5. Center for Primary Care and Public Health (unisanté), University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Several recent studies have reported very high estimates of sensitivity and specificity of fecal immunochemical tests (FITs) at seemingly high levels of precision using registry-based follow-up of participants in very large FIT-based screening programs. We aimed to assess the validity of estimates of diagnostic performance parameters derived by this indirect approach. METHODS: We modeled expected values of sensitivity and specificity of colorectal cancer detection in studies using the indirect approach and their deviation from true values under a broad range of plausible assumptions, and we compared these expected values with recently reported estimates of FIT sensitivity and specificity from such studies. RESULTS: Using a sensitivity of 75% and specificity of 93.6% (from studies using a direct approach, i.e., colonoscopy follow-up of all participants), the indirect approach would be expected to yield sensitivities between 84.5% and 91.1% and specificities between 93.4% and 93.6% under a range of realistic assumptions regarding colonoscopic follow-up rates of positive FITs and clinical manifestation rates of preclinical colorectal cancer. DISCUSSION: Very high sensitivities of FITs recently reported with seemingly very high levels of precision by several large-scale registry-based studies, which are in line with expected results based on our model calculations, are likely to be strongly overestimated and need to be interpreted with due caution.
OBJECTIVES: Several recent studies have reported very high estimates of sensitivity and specificity of fecal immunochemical tests (FITs) at seemingly high levels of precision using registry-based follow-up of participants in very large FIT-based screening programs. We aimed to assess the validity of estimates of diagnostic performance parameters derived by this indirect approach. METHODS: We modeled expected values of sensitivity and specificity of colorectal cancer detection in studies using the indirect approach and their deviation from true values under a broad range of plausible assumptions, and we compared these expected values with recently reported estimates of FIT sensitivity and specificity from such studies. RESULTS: Using a sensitivity of 75% and specificity of 93.6% (from studies using a direct approach, i.e., colonoscopy follow-up of all participants), the indirect approach would be expected to yield sensitivities between 84.5% and 91.1% and specificities between 93.4% and 93.6% under a range of realistic assumptions regarding colonoscopic follow-up rates of positive FITs and clinical manifestation rates of preclinical colorectal cancer. DISCUSSION: Very high sensitivities of FITs recently reported with seemingly very high levels of precision by several large-scale registry-based studies, which are in line with expected results based on our model calculations, are likely to be strongly overestimated and need to be interpreted with due caution.
Authors: Mathias M Petersen; Linnea Ferm; Jakob Kleif; Thomas B Piper; Eva Rømer; Ib J Christensen; Hans J Nielsen Journal: Cancers (Basel) Date: 2020-09-12 Impact factor: 6.639
Authors: Noel Pin-Vieito; Laura García Nimo; Luis Bujanda; Begona Román Alonso; María Ángeles Gutierrez-Stampa; Vanessa Aguilar-Gama; Isabel Portillo; Joaquín Cubiella Journal: United European Gastroenterol J Date: 2021-03-01 Impact factor: 4.623