Udi Nussinovitch1,2, Shiri Rubin2,3, Yair Levy2,4, Merav Lidar2,5, Avi Livneh2,5,6. 1. Department of Cardiology and Applicative Cardiovascular Research Center (ACRC), Meir Medical Center, Kfar Saba, Israel. 2. Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel. 3. Department of Pediatrics A, Schneider Children's Medical Center of Israel, Petah Tikva, Israel. 4. Department of Medicine E, Meir Medical Center, Kfar Saba, Israel. 5. Rheumatology Unit, The Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, Israel. 6. Department of Medicine F, and the Heller Institute of Medical Research, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, Israel.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Systemic sclerosis (SSc) may affect the heart with microvascular dysfunction and lead to an early cardiac death, but the association between certain repolarization indexes and SSc heart disease remains controversial. Our goal was to evaluate a previously unstudied marker of repolarization dynamics, i.e., QT variability, in patients with SSc and to assess its prognostic implications. METHODS: A total of 17 patients with SSc and 21 healthy controls were included into this prospective study. Electrocardiograms were conducted under strict standards. The QT variability index (QTVI), normalized QT variability (QTVN), and power spectral analysis of QT dynamics, considered as markers of ventricular arrhythmias in a number of other disorders, were determined using designated computer software. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in demographic and cardiac important clinical parameters between the groups. Also, the mean QTVI, QTVN, and power spectral analysis parameters were comparable between the patients with SSc and control subjects. At baseline, the QTVI values of 1 patient with SSc, who experienced ventricular arrhythmia prior to inclusion in the study, were considerably higher compared to other patients with SSc. None of the remaining patients with SSc or the control subjects developed arrhythmia during the follow-up of 8 years. CONCLUSION: Higher than normal QTVI may be found in the minority of patients with SSc. The prognostic significance of this finding is unknown, but it may entail an increased risk of ventricular arrhythmias. Therefore, the value of QTVI as a tool for arrhythmia risk stratification in SSc merits further research.
OBJECTIVE:Systemic sclerosis (SSc) may affect the heart with microvascular dysfunction and lead to an early cardiac death, but the association between certain repolarization indexes and SSc heart disease remains controversial. Our goal was to evaluate a previously unstudied marker of repolarization dynamics, i.e., QT variability, in patients with SSc and to assess its prognostic implications. METHODS: A total of 17 patients with SSc and 21 healthy controls were included into this prospective study. Electrocardiograms were conducted under strict standards. The QT variability index (QTVI), normalized QT variability (QTVN), and power spectral analysis of QT dynamics, considered as markers of ventricular arrhythmias in a number of other disorders, were determined using designated computer software. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in demographic and cardiac important clinical parameters between the groups. Also, the mean QTVI, QTVN, and power spectral analysis parameters were comparable between the patients with SSc and control subjects. At baseline, the QTVI values of 1 patient with SSc, who experienced ventricular arrhythmia prior to inclusion in the study, were considerably higher compared to other patients with SSc. None of the remaining patients with SSc or the control subjects developed arrhythmia during the follow-up of 8 years. CONCLUSION: Higher than normal QTVI may be found in the minority of patients with SSc. The prognostic significance of this finding is unknown, but it may entail an increased risk of ventricular arrhythmias. Therefore, the value of QTVI as a tool for arrhythmia risk stratification in SSc merits further research.
Authors: Anthony J Tyndall; Bettina Bannert; Madelon Vonk; Paolo Airò; Franco Cozzi; Patricia E Carreira; Dominique Farge Bancel; Yannick Allanore; Ulf Müller-Ladner; Oliver Distler; Florenzo Iannone; Raffaele Pellerito; Margarita Pileckyte; Irene Miniati; Lidia Ananieva; Alexandra Balbir Gurman; Nemanja Damjanov; Adelheid Mueller; Gabriele Valentini; Gabriela Riemekasten; Mohammed Tikly; Laura Hummers; Maria J S Henriques; Paola Caramaschi; Agneta Scheja; Blaz Rozman; Evelien Ton; Gábor Kumánovics; Bernard Coleiro; Eva Feierl; Gabriella Szucs; Carlos Alberto Von Mühlen; Valeria Riccieri; Srdan Novak; Carlo Chizzolini; Anna Kotulska; Christopher Denton; Paulo C Coelho; Ina Kötter; Ismail Simsek; Paloma García de la Pena Lefebvre; Eric Hachulla; James R Seibold; Simona Rednic; Jirí Stork; Jadranka Morovic-Vergles; Ulrich A Walker Journal: Ann Rheum Dis Date: 2010-06-15 Impact factor: 19.103
Authors: Irena Andršová; Katerina Hnatkova; Martina Šišáková; Ondřej Toman; Peter Smetana; Katharina M Huster; Petra Barthel; Tomáš Novotný; Georg Schmidt; Marek Malik Journal: Diagnostics (Basel) Date: 2020-12-16
Authors: Ondřej Toman; Katerina Hnatkova; Martina Šišáková; Peter Smetana; Katharina M Huster; Petra Barthel; Tomáš Novotný; Irena Andršová; Georg Schmidt; Marek Malik Journal: Front Physiol Date: 2022-04-01 Impact factor: 4.755
Authors: Veronika Sebestyén; Gabriella Szűcs; Dénes Páll; Dóra Ujvárosy; Tamás Ötvös; Imre Csige; Tamás Pataki; István Lőrincz; Zoltán Szabó Journal: Rheumatology (Oxford) Date: 2020-03-01 Impact factor: 7.580