Heidi Schwellnus1, Yukari Seko2, Gillian King1,3, Patricia Baldwin4, Michelle Servais4. 1. Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. 2. School of Professional Communication, Ryerson University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. 3. Department of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. 4. Thames Valley Children's Centre, London, Ontario, Canada.
Abstract
Aims: This qualitative descriptive study explored perceived impacts of solution-focused coaching in pediatric rehabilitation (SFC-peds) from the viewpoint of experienced therapists. Methods: Semi-structured in-depth interviews were conducted with six participants (four occupational therapists and two physical therapists) who had incorporated SFC-peds into their practice for three years or longer. Participants were asked to describe perceived differences SFC-peds has made to their clinical practice, service provision, and relationships with clients and families. Interview transcripts were analyzed using the method of thematic analysis. Results: Three major themes, each with subthemes, were identified: 1) changes in therapists' perception of their roles; 2) increased service effectiveness; and 3) enhanced client capacity. Through long-term engagement with SFC-peds, participants have experienced a role shift from an expert adviser to a collaborative facilitator who assists clients and families with capacity building and self-discovery of solutions for their everyday environments.Conclusions: The findings suggest that SFC-peds can help participants reframe professional expertise and integrate principles of family-centred care into their day-to-day practice. Individual- and system-level support, along with flexibility in service structures and processes, may be needed to further the implementation of SFC-peds in service delivery.
Aims: This qualitative descriptive study explored perceived impacts of solution-focused coaching in pediatric rehabilitation (SFC-peds) from the viewpoint of experienced therapists. Methods: Semi-structured in-depth interviews were conducted with six participants (four occupational therapists and two physical therapists) who had incorporated SFC-peds into their practice for three years or longer. Participants were asked to describe perceived differences SFC-peds has made to their clinical practice, service provision, and relationships with clients and families. Interview transcripts were analyzed using the method of thematic analysis. Results: Three major themes, each with subthemes, were identified: 1) changes in therapists' perception of their roles; 2) increased service effectiveness; and 3) enhanced client capacity. Through long-term engagement with SFC-peds, participants have experienced a role shift from an expert adviser to a collaborative facilitator who assists clients and families with capacity building and self-discovery of solutions for their everyday environments.Conclusions: The findings suggest that SFC-peds can help participants reframe professional expertise and integrate principles of family-centred care into their day-to-day practice. Individual- and system-level support, along with flexibility in service structures and processes, may be needed to further the implementation of SFC-peds in service delivery.