Literature DB >> 31657125

A comparative study on the cellular viability and debridement efficiency of antimicrobial-based wound dressings.

Rui Chen1, Anne-Marie Salisbury1, Steven L Percival1.   

Abstract

A concentrated surfactant gel containing polyhexamethylene biguanide (CSG-PHMB) (CSG: Plurogel) was evaluated for in vitro cell cytotoxicity using the direct contact, extraction, and cell insert assays, along with its ability to breakdown artificial wound eschar and slough, compared with other clinically available wound gels: a wound gel loaded with 0.13% benzalkonium chloride (BXG) and a highly viscous gel loaded with 0.1% polyhexamethylene biguanide (PXG). Following treatment with CSG-PHMB, BXG, and PXG at day 1, the viability of L929 and HDFa cells sharply decreased to lower than 20% of the culture media control in the direct contact assay; however, cell viability of L929 was 128.65 ± 1.41%, 99.90 ± 2.84%*, and 64.08 ± 5.99%* respectively; HDFa was 84.58 ± 10.41%, 19.54 ± 3.06%**, and 96.28 ± 33.67%, respectively, in the extraction assay. In the cell insert model, cell viability of L929 cells were 95.25 ± 0.96%, 47.49 ± 5.37%**, and 48.63 ± 7.00%**, respectively; HDFa cell viability were 92.80 ± 1.29%, 38.86 ± 4.28%**, and 49.90 ± 2.55%** (*: P < .01; **P < .001 compared with CSG-PHMB; cell viability of culture medium without treatment at day 1 was 100%). The cell extraction model on day 1 indicated that CSG-PHMB had higher viability of L929 cells compared with BXG. In addition, the cellular viability results indicated that CSG-PHMB gel exhibited lower cytotoxicity when compared with BXG and PXG in the cell insert model assay. Within the in vitro debridement model, CSG-PHMB exhibited an ability to potentially increase the loosening of the collagen matrix. The reason for this may be because of the concentrated surfactant found within the CSG-PHMB, which has the ability to lower the surface tension, aiding in the movements of fragments and debris in the fluorescent artificial wound eschar model (fAWE).
© 2019 Medicalhelplines.com Inc and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biofilm; cytotoxicity; debridement; surfactant; wound dressing

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31657125      PMCID: PMC7949275          DOI: 10.1111/iwj.13234

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Wound J        ISSN: 1742-4801            Impact factor:   3.315


  30 in total

1.  The structure and composition of chronic wound eschar.

Authors:  A M Thomas; K G Harding; K Moore
Journal:  J Wound Care       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 2.072

2.  Effect of enzymatic debridement with two different collagenases versus mechanical debridement on chronic hard-to-heal wounds.

Authors:  Maria Giuseppina Onesti; Paolo Fioramonti; Pasquale Fino; Valentina Sorvillo; Sara Carella; Nicolò Scuderi
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2015-02-03       Impact factor: 3.315

3.  Study on the debridement efficacy of formulated enzymatic wound debriding agents by in vitro assessment using artificial wound eschar and by an in vivo pig model.

Authors:  Lei Shi; Ryan Ermis; Kan Lam; Jerry Cowart; Paul Attar; Duncan Aust
Journal:  Wound Repair Regen       Date:  2009 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.617

Review 4.  A review of the scientific evidence for biofilms in wounds.

Authors:  Steven L Percival; Katja E Hill; David W Williams; Samuel J Hooper; Dave W Thomas; John W Costerton
Journal:  Wound Repair Regen       Date:  2012 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.617

5.  Effectiveness of a monofilament wound debridement pad at removing biofilm and slough: ex vivo and clinical performance.

Authors:  Gregory S Schultz; Kevin Woo; Dot Weir; Qingping Yang
Journal:  J Wound Care       Date:  2018-02-02       Impact factor: 2.072

6.  Efficacy of a surfactant-based wound dressing on biofilm control.

Authors:  Steven L Percival; Dieter Mayer; Anne-Marie Salisbury
Journal:  Wound Repair Regen       Date:  2017-10-11       Impact factor: 3.617

7.  Bromelain-based enzymatic debridement of chronic wounds: A preliminary report.

Authors:  Yaron Shoham; Yuval Krieger; Eran Tamir; Eldad Silberstein; Alexander Bogdanov-Berezovsky; Josef Haik; Lior Rosenberg
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2018-04-25       Impact factor: 3.315

8.  Slough and biofilm: removal of barriers to wound healing by desloughing.

Authors:  S L Percival; L Suleman
Journal:  J Wound Care       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 2.072

9.  The Immediate and Delayed Post-Debridement Effects on Tissue Bacterial Wound Counts of Hypochlorous Acid Versus Saline Irrigation in Chronic Wounds.

Authors:  John M Hiebert; Martin C Robson
Journal:  Eplasty       Date:  2016-12-01

10.  Self-induced mechanical stress can trigger biofilm formation in uropathogenic Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Eric K Chu; Onur Kilic; Hojung Cho; Alex Groisman; Andre Levchenko
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-10-05       Impact factor: 14.919

View more
  1 in total

1.  A comparative study on the cellular viability and debridement efficiency of antimicrobial-based wound dressings.

Authors:  Rui Chen; Anne-Marie Salisbury; Steven L Percival
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2019-10-27       Impact factor: 3.315

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.