Radek Frič1, Per Kristian Eide2,3. 1. Department of Neurosurgery, Oslo University Hospital - Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway. radek.fric@medisin.uio.no. 2. Department of Neurosurgery, Oslo University Hospital - Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway. 3. Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: As the understanding of pathophysiology behind Chiari malformation still is limited, the treatment of Chiari malformation type 1 remains rather empirical. This may result in suboptimal treatment strategy and outcome in many cases. In this review, we critically address whether the condition known today as Chiari malformation type I should rather be denoted Chiari syndrome. METHODS: The current knowledge of Chiari malformation type 1 is summarized from the historical, etymological, genetic, clinical, and in particular pathophysiological perspectives. RESULTS: There are several lines of evidence that Chiari malformation type 1 represents a condition significantly different from types 2 to 4. Unlike the other types, the type 1 should rather be considered a syndrome, thus supporting the reasons to reappraise the traditional classification of Chiari malformations. CONCLUSION: We propose that Chiari malformation type 1 should rather be denoted Chiari syndrome, while the notation malformation is maintained for types 2-4.
OBJECTIVE: As the understanding of pathophysiology behind Chiari malformation still is limited, the treatment of Chiari malformation type 1 remains rather empirical. This may result in suboptimal treatment strategy and outcome in many cases. In this review, we critically address whether the condition known today as Chiari malformation type I should rather be denoted Chiari syndrome. METHODS: The current knowledge of Chiari malformation type 1 is summarized from the historical, etymological, genetic, clinical, and in particular pathophysiological perspectives. RESULTS: There are several lines of evidence that Chiari malformation type 1 represents a condition significantly different from types 2 to 4. Unlike the other types, the type 1 should rather be considered a syndrome, thus supporting the reasons to reappraise the traditional classification of Chiari malformations. CONCLUSION: We propose that Chiari malformation type 1 should rather be denoted Chiari syndrome, while the notation malformation is maintained for types 2-4.
Authors: Jing Zhuang; Jin Gong; Gary D Hack; Yan-Yan Chi; Yang Song; Sheng-Bo Yu; Hong-Jin Sui Journal: Surg Radiol Anat Date: 2022-06-17 Impact factor: 1.354