BACKGROUND: Crizotinib has been the standard treatment for patients with anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-rearranged advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). It demonstrated superior progression-free survival (PFS) and higher objective response rates (ORRs) vs. chemotherapy in previously treated and untreated patients with ALK-positive advanced NSCLC. This retrospective analysis reports real-world experience in treatment outcome and toxicity of crizotinib in this group of patients, with a focus on the cardiac toxicity and its management. METHODS: Twenty-two patients diagnosed with ALK-positive NSCLC, either by immunohistochemistry (IHC) or fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), treated at Johns Hopkins Singapore International Medical Centre (JHSIMC) and Tan Tock Seng Hospital (TTSH) in Singapore, were identified and followed for a median of 18 months. Data were collected and analyzed for baseline demographics, PFS, ORR, duration of response, toxicity and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Clinical profile of patients included in the study was similar with clinical trials on crizotinib. Most patients were young of mean age 42, non-smokers and with good performance status. Fifty-nine percent had prior chemotherapy. Fifty percent of patients had brain metastases (BM), either de novo or on progression. ORR of crizotinib was 64% with median total duration of treatment of 8.5 months (range, 2-73+ months). Median PFS for patients treated with first-line crizotinib was 15 months. Most patients with BM had brain radiation. Median time for intracranial progression from the start of crizotinib was 11 months. Those with stable or responding extracranial disease continued crizotinib after radiotherapy to the brain. Median duration of response in this group of patients was 14 months (range, 2-31 months). Median OS among patients treated with upfront crizotinib was not reached, with 7 out of 11 patients still alive at the time of data analysis (n=11, range, 1-73+). Toxicity was manageable with moderate rate of grade 3 or worse toxicity (n=7, 31.8%). Three patients had grade 3-4 neutropenia. Eighteen percent (n=4) of patients developed cardiotoxicities such as bradycardia, prolonged QTc interval and complete heart block. One patient who developed complete heart block required pacemaker insertion. Two patients are long term responders who have been on crizotinib for 68+ and 73+ months. CONCLUSIONS: This retrospective analysis of a real-world experience confirms the therapeutic benefit of crizotinib in advanced ALK-positive NSCLC. Our data showed crizotinib is tolerable and effective, comparable with literature report. Occasional serious cardiac toxicity requires attention. 2019 Journal of Thoracic Disease. All rights reserved.
BACKGROUND: Crizotinib has been the standard treatment for patients with anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-rearranged advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). It demonstrated superior progression-free survival (PFS) and higher objective response rates (ORRs) vs. chemotherapy in previously treated and untreated patients with ALK-positive advanced NSCLC. This retrospective analysis reports real-world experience in treatment outcome and toxicity of crizotinib in this group of patients, with a focus on the cardiac toxicity and its management. METHODS: Twenty-two patients diagnosed with ALK-positive NSCLC, either by immunohistochemistry (IHC) or fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), treated at Johns Hopkins Singapore International Medical Centre (JHSIMC) and Tan Tock Seng Hospital (TTSH) in Singapore, were identified and followed for a median of 18 months. Data were collected and analyzed for baseline demographics, PFS, ORR, duration of response, toxicity and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Clinical profile of patients included in the study was similar with clinical trials on crizotinib. Most patients were young of mean age 42, non-smokers and with good performance status. Fifty-nine percent had prior chemotherapy. Fifty percent of patients had brain metastases (BM), either de novo or on progression. ORR of crizotinib was 64% with median total duration of treatment of 8.5 months (range, 2-73+ months). Median PFS for patients treated with first-line crizotinib was 15 months. Most patients with BM had brain radiation. Median time for intracranial progression from the start of crizotinib was 11 months. Those with stable or responding extracranial disease continued crizotinib after radiotherapy to the brain. Median duration of response in this group of patients was 14 months (range, 2-31 months). Median OS among patients treated with upfront crizotinib was not reached, with 7 out of 11 patients still alive at the time of data analysis (n=11, range, 1-73+). Toxicity was manageable with moderate rate of grade 3 or worse toxicity (n=7, 31.8%). Three patients had grade 3-4 neutropenia. Eighteen percent (n=4) of patients developed cardiotoxicities such as bradycardia, prolonged QTc interval and complete heart block. One patient who developed complete heart block required pacemaker insertion. Two patients are long term responders who have been on crizotinib for 68+ and 73+ months. CONCLUSIONS: This retrospective analysis of a real-world experience confirms the therapeutic benefit of crizotinib in advanced ALK-positive NSCLC. Our data showed crizotinib is tolerable and effective, comparable with literature report. Occasional serious cardiac toxicity requires attention. 2019 Journal of Thoracic Disease. All rights reserved.
Authors: Alice T Shaw; Sai-Hong I Ou; Yung-Jue Bang; D Ross Camidge; Benjamin J Solomon; Ravi Salgia; Gregory J Riely; Marileila Varella-Garcia; Geoffrey I Shapiro; Daniel B Costa; Robert C Doebele; Long Phi Le; Zongli Zheng; Weiwei Tan; Patricia Stephenson; S Martin Shreeve; Lesley M Tye; James G Christensen; Keith D Wilner; Jeffrey W Clark; A John Iafrate Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2014-09-27 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Kimberly L Johung; Norman Yeh; Neil B Desai; Terence M Williams; Tim Lautenschlaeger; Nils D Arvold; Matthew S Ning; Albert Attia; Christine M Lovly; Sarah Goldberg; Kathryn Beal; James B Yu; Brian D Kavanagh; Veronica L Chiang; D Ross Camidge; Joseph N Contessa Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2015-10-05 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Sai-Hong Ignatius Ou; Eunice L Kwak; Christina Siwak-Tapp; Joni Dy; Kristin Bergethon; Jeffrey W Clark; D Ross Camidge; Benjamin J Solomon; Robert G Maki; Yung-Jue Bang; Dong-Wan Kim; James Christensen; Weiwei Tan; Keith D Wilner; Ravi Salgia; A John Iafrate Journal: J Thorac Oncol Date: 2011-05 Impact factor: 15.609
Authors: Federico Cappuzzo; Denis Moro-Sibilot; Oliver Gautschi; Ekaterini Boleti; Enriqueta Felip; Harry J M Groen; Paul Germonpré; Peter Meldgaard; Edurne Arriola; Nicola Steele; Jesme Fox; Patrick Schnell; Arne Engelsberg; Jürgen Wolf Journal: Lung Cancer Date: 2014-12-18 Impact factor: 5.705
Authors: Sai-Hong Ignatius Ou; Wilson P Tong; Michele Azada; Christina Siwak-Tapp; Joni Dy; Jonathan A Stiber Journal: Cancer Date: 2013-03-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Fiona H Blackhall; Solange Peters; Lukas Bubendorf; Urania Dafni; Keith M Kerr; Henrik Hager; Alex Soltermann; Kenneth J O'Byrne; Christoph Dooms; Aleksandra Sejda; Javier Hernández-Losa; Antonio Marchetti; Spasenija Savic; Qiang Tan; Erik Thunnissen; Ernst-Jan M Speel; Richard Cheney; Daisuke Nonaka; Jeroen de Jong; Miguel Martorell; Igor Letovanec; Rafael Rosell; Rolf A Stahel Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2014-07-28 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Amanda J W Gibson; Adrian Box; Michelle L Dean; Anifat A Elegbede; Desiree Hao; Randeep Sangha; D Gwyn Bebb Journal: JTO Clin Res Rep Date: 2021-03-01