Literature DB >> 31656616

High-dose oral methylprednisolone for the treatment of multiple sclerosis relapses: cost-minimisation analysis and patient's satisfaction.

Ana María Horta-Hernández1, Begoña Esaclera-Izquierdo2, Antonio Yusta-Izquierdo3, Eva Martín-Alcalde1, María Blanco-Crespo1, Adriana Álvarez-Nonay1, Miguel Torralba4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To study the use of high-dose oral methylprednisolone compounded formulation and intravenous methylprednisolone for the treatment of multiple sclerosis relapses. To compare both routes of methylprednisolone administration related to cost and patient's satisfaction with the treatment.
METHODS: A retrospective cohort observational study was performed from January 2012 to December 2016. All multiple sclerosis relapses treated with high-dose oral methylprednisolone compounded formulation or intravenous methylprednisolone were studied. Patient's acceptance grade of the treatment was analysed with a survey based on the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication. A cost-minimisation analysis using real world data from our hospital was performed to compare the high-dose oral methylprednisolone formulation and intravenous administration.
RESULTS: 92 patients were included (88% had recurrent remitting multiple sclerosis). Median Expanded Disability Status Scale score was 2 (IRC: 1-3.5). 162 relapses were treated: 77 with intravenous methylprednisolone and 85 with high-dose oral methylprednisolone formulation. The most frequent prescriptions were 1000 mg intravenous methylprednisolone and 1250 mg oral methylprednisolone during 4 days. Recovery from relapse was achieved in 91% of patients in the intravenous group and 93% in the oral group. The survey revealed that 79% of patients preferred the oral route because of convenience (P<0.001) and global satisfaction (P<0.04). Real world data demonstrated savings of €61 708 (91%) using the high-dose oral methylprednisolone formulation during the study period.
CONCLUSIONS: High-dose oral methylprednisolone compounded formulation was a cost-effective alternative compared with methylprednisolone intravenous administration. Moreover, patients with multiple sclerosis preferred the oral compounded formulation for the treatment of relapses. © European Association of Hospital Pharmacists (unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2019. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cost-minimization analysis; multiple sclerosis; patient’s satisfaction; relapse; treatment

Year:  2018        PMID: 31656616      PMCID: PMC6788278          DOI: 10.1136/ejhpharm-2018-001499

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Hosp Pharm        ISSN: 2047-9956


  16 in total

1.  Oral corticosteroids for multiple sclerosis relapse.

Authors:  Giancarlo Comi; Marta Radaelli
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2015-09-05       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  New insights into the burden and costs of multiple sclerosis in Europe: Results for Spain.

Authors:  Celia Oreja-Guevara; Gisela Kobelt; Jenny Berg; Daniela Capsa; Jennifer Eriksson
Journal:  Mult Scler       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 6.312

3.  Treatment experience, burden and unmet needs (TRIBUNE) in MS study: results from five European countries.

Authors:  Korinna Karampampa; Anders Gustavsson; Carolin Miltenburger; Benjamin Eckert
Journal:  Mult Scler       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 6.312

4.  Similar biological effect of high-dose oral versus intravenous methylprednisolone in multiple sclerosis relapses.

Authors:  L Grau-López; A Teniente-Serra; M Tintoré; A Rovira; L Ramió-Torrenta; L Brieva; A Saiz; A Cano; O Carmona; J V Hervás; E M Martínez-Cáceres; C Ramo-Tello
Journal:  Mult Scler       Date:  2014-08-21       Impact factor: 6.312

Review 5.  Consensus statement on the treatment of multiple sclerosis by the Spanish Society of Neurology in 2016.

Authors:  A García Merino; J Ramón Ara Callizo; O Fernández Fernández; L Landete Pascual; E Moral Torres; A Rodríguez-Antigüedad Zarrantz
Journal:  Neurologia       Date:  2016-05-06       Impact factor: 3.109

6.  Treatment experience, burden, and unmet needs (TRIBUNE) in multiple sclerosis: the costs and utilities of MS patients in Canada.

Authors:  Korinna Karampampa; Anders Gustavsson; Carolin Miltenburger; Christian M Kindundu; Daniel H Selchen
Journal:  J Popul Ther Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2012-01-10

Review 7.  Oral versus intravenous steroids for treatment of relapses in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Jodie M Burton; Paul W O'Connor; Marika Hohol; Joseph Beyene
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-12-12

8.  A randomized clinical trial of oral versus intravenous methylprednisolone for relapse of MS.

Authors:  C Ramo-Tello; L Grau-López; M Tintoré; A Rovira; L Ramió i Torrenta; L Brieva; A Cano; O Carmona; A Saiz; F Torres; P Giner; C Nos; A Massuet; X Montalbán; E Martínez-Cáceres; J Costa
Journal:  Mult Scler       Date:  2013-10-21       Impact factor: 6.312

9.  Validation of a general measure of treatment satisfaction, the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM), using a national panel study of chronic disease.

Authors:  Mark J Atkinson; Anusha Sinha; Steven L Hass; Shoshana S Colman; Ritesh N Kumar; Meryl Brod; Clayton R Rowland
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2004-02-26       Impact factor: 3.186

10.  Measuring treatment satisfaction in MS: Is the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication fit for purpose?

Authors:  Patrick Vermersch; Jeremy Hobart; Catherine Dive-Pouletty; Sylvie Bozzi; Steven Hass; Patricia K Coyle
Journal:  Mult Scler       Date:  2016-07-11       Impact factor: 6.312

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.