| Literature DB >> 31656510 |
Hui Chin Koo1, Z Hadirah2, A Airina2, R Nurul Alifatul Amrina2, N Faziela2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Dietary composition is the cornerstone of weight management. This study aimed to investigate the effect of nutrient intakes on anthropometric profiles among university students.Entities:
Keywords: Anthropometric measurements; fiber; macronutrients; malaysian university students; micronutrients
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31656510 PMCID: PMC6794514 DOI: 10.4314/ahs.v19i2.50
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Afr Health Sci ISSN: 1680-6905 Impact factor: 0.927
Demographic characteristics, anthropometric profiles and prevalence of under- and over-reported of energy intake among students (n=411)
| Variables | Total (n=411) | Male (n=155) | Female (n=256) |
| Median (IqR) | Median (IqR) | Median (IqR) | |
| Age (years) | 21.0 (3.0) | 22.0 (3.0) | 21.0 (3.0) |
| Malay | 286 (69.6) | 111 (71.6) | 175 (68.4) |
| Indian | 95 (23.1) | 35 (22.6) | 60 (23.4) |
| Chinese | 26 (6.3) | 8 (5.2) | 18 (7.0) |
| Others | 4 (1.0) | 1 (0.6) | 3 (1.2) |
| Body mass index (kg/m2) | 23.0 (6.9) | 23.3 (7.3) | 22.7 (6.9) |
| Percentage of body fat (%) | 29.7 (10.6) | 21.7 (11.1) | 32.1 (7.6) |
| Visceral fat | 4.5 (5.5) | 6.0 (7.5) | 4.0 (4.5) |
| Waist circumference (cm) | 76.0 (17.0) | 80.0 (15.0) | 74.0 (14.0) |
| Underweight | 26 (6.3) | 8 (5.2) | 18 (7.0) |
| Normal weight | 180 (43.8) | 66 (42.6) | 114 (44.5) |
| Overweight | 119 (29.0) | 44 (28.4) | 75 (29.3) |
| Obese | 86 (20.9) | 37 (23.8) | 49 (19.2) |
| Under-reporting | 34 (8.3) | 13 (8.4) | 21 (8.2) |
| Normal-reporting | 371 (90.3) | 140 (90.3) | 231 (90.2) |
| Over-reporting | 6 (1.5) | 2 (1.3) | 4 (1.6) |
Significantly different between boys and girls:
U=5866, z=−11.973, p<0.001
U=13428, z=−5.500, p<0.001
U=12842, z=−5.998, p<0.001
Overall nutrient intakes obtained by three-day 24-hour dietary recalls of the respondents (n=371)
| Nutrient intakes | Sex | Mean | SD | Range | RNI (%) | |
| Min | Max | |||||
| Energy (g) | Male (n=155) | 2280 | 48.2 | 1812 | 2988 | 93.4 |
| Female (n=256) | 1984 | 76.8 | 1534 | 2657 | 99.2 | |
| Protein (g) | Male (n=155) | 65.8 | 30.0 | 16.3 | 136.3 | 106.1 |
| Female (n=256) | 57.9 | 57.6 | 12.4 | 130.6 | 105.3 | |
| Carbohydrate (g) | Male (n=155) | 235.4 | 74.2 | 172.3 | 289.0 | - |
| Female (n=256) | 212.7 | 64.2 | 145.5 | 280.6 | ||
| Fat (g) | Male (n=155) | 62.1 | 26.7 | 13.8 | 205.9 | - |
| Female (n=256) | 54.5 | 23.5 | 16.8 | 157.3 | ||
| Dietary fibre (g) | Male (n=155) | 2.2 | 1.8 | 0 | 10.7 | 11.0 |
| Female (n=256) | 2.2 | 1.5 | 0 | 8.0 | 11.0 | |
| Calcium (mg) | Male (n=155) | 412.2 | 213.3 | 17.5 | 1148.0 | 51.5 |
| Female (n=256) | 370.6 | 201.2 | 47.4 | 1230.4 | 46.3 | |
| Zinc (mg) | Male (n=155) | 5.2 | 3.5 | 0.2 | 27.8 | 77.6 |
| Female (n=256) | 4.2 | 2.4 | 0 | 15.5 | 85.7 | |
| Vitamin C (mg) | Male (n=155) | 19.7 | 22.8 | 0.13 | 130.0 | 28.1 |
| Female (n=256) | 25.4 | 28.5 | 0 | 226.1 | 36.3 | |
| Thiamine (mg) | Male (n=155) | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.1 | 2.3 | 58.3 |
| Female (n=256) | 0.8 | 0.9 | 0.1 | 1.9 | 72.7 | |
| Riboflavin (mg) | Male (n=155) | 1.2 | 1.1 | 0.2 | 12.0 | 92.3 |
| Female (n=256) | 1.1 | 0.8 | 0.2 | 9.0 | 100 | |
| Niacin (mg) | Male (n=155) | 11.7 | 5.7 | 2.1 | 35.5 | 73.1 |
| Female (n=256) | 10.2 | 4.9 | 0.7 | 32.9 | 72.9 | |
| Folate (µg) | Male (n=155) | 59.6 | 42.0 | 2.3 | 343.7 | 14.9 |
| Female (n=256) | 53.6 | 39.2 | 0 | 349.2 | 13.4 | |
RNI: Recommended Nutrient Intakes for Malaysia 2005; significantly different between male and female
p<0.05
*p<0.01
p<0.001
Summary of stepwise linear regression for nutrient intakes predicting various anthropometric measurements (n=371)
| Nutrient | Body mass | Body fat | Waist circumference | Visceral fat | ||||
| Standardized | Standardized | Standardized | Standardized β | |||||
| Protein | 0.056 | 0.279 | 0.015 | 0.709 | 0.026 | 0.600 | 0.045 | 0.901 |
| Carbohydrate | −0.101 | 0.134 | −0.064 | 0.234 | −0.113 | 0.080 | −0.099 | 0.135 |
| Fat | −0.040 | 0.541 | 0.056 | 0.286 | −0.042 | 0.504 | −0.041 | 0.526 |
| Fiber | −0.042 | 0.492 | −0.031 | 0.520 | −0.080 | 0.177 | −0.040 | 0.503 |
| Calcium | −0.043 | 0.505 | −0.087 | 0.091 | −0.015 | 0.806 | −0.028 | 0.662 |
| Zinc | −0.006 | 0.919 | 0.023 | 0.610 | 0.048 | 0.385 | −0.005 | 0.928 |
| Vitamin C | 0.037 | 0.526 | 0.003 | 0.954 | 0.025 | 0.664 | 0.040 | 0.489 |
| Thiamin | −0.020 | 0.680 | −0.006 | 0.882 | −0.028 | 0.552 | −0.016 | 0.739 |
| Riboflavin | 0.115 | 0.089 | −0.132 | 0.014* | 0.094 | 0.145 | 0.118 | 0.073 |
| Niacin | −0.161 | 0.027* | −0.180 | 0.002** | −0.134 | 0.054 | −0.131 | 0.065 |
| Folate | 0.101 | 0.074 | 0.030 | 0.500 | 0.091 | 0.092 | 0.083 | 0.135 |
Adjusted regression coefficient for age, sex and race; Nutrient intakes were adjusted for energy according to the residual adjustment method (Willet et al., 1997) and included in the models as residual value; Model assumptions were fulfilled; There were no interactions among independent variables; No multicollinearity detected
Coefficient of determination (R2)= 0.271
Coefficient of determination (R2)= 0.645
Coefficient of determination (R2)= 0.386
Coefficient of determination (R2)= 0.341.