Interventional radiology has been constantly developing in terms of the techniques, materials, and methods of intervention. It interacts with all areas of medicine, always with the ultimate goal of ensuring the well-being of patients. Advances in imaging techniques, especially in the last two decades, have led to a paradigm shift in the field of urological imaging interventions. Many urologic diseases that were previously treated only surgically can now be effectively managed using minimally invasive image-guided techniques, often with shorter hospital stays and requiring only local anesthesia or conscious sedation.
Interventional radiology has been constantly developing in terms of the techniques, materials, and methods of intervention. It interacts with all areas of medicine, always with the ultimate goal of ensuring the well-being of patients. Advances in imaging techniques, especially in the last two decades, have led to a paradigm shift in the field of urological imaging interventions. Many urologic diseases that were previously treated only surgically can now be effectively managed using minimally invasive image-guided techniques, often with shorter hospital stays and requiring only local anesthesia or conscious sedation.
Image-guided interventions performed by interventional radiologists have changed the
management of various abdominal conditions, urologic conditions in
particular([1]-[5]). The number of potential applications of such
interventions is growing because of their minimally invasive nature, the minimal
morbidity associated with the procedures, and the fact that their use can shorten
hospital stays. Some traditional diagnostic procedures have evolved to become
state-of-the-art therapeutic techniques, which include a wide range of vascular and
nonvascular applications. Interventional radiology techniques continue to play an
important role in drainage procedures, urolithiasis management, dilatation of the
renal pelvis, tumor ablation, and the treatment of renovascular diseases. Multiple
imaging modalities are used for these purposes, primarily fluoroscopy,
ultrasonography, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and digital
subtraction angiography. It is important that a close multidisciplinary
collaboration be maintained among urologists, nephrologists, and interventional
radiologists([6]). This pictorial essay examines various aspects of
interventional uroradiology.
OBSTRUCTIVE UROPATHY
Interruption of the normal flow of urine is one of the most common causes of acute
and chronic renal failure (Figure 1), requiring
the use a procedure that has the objective of restoring physiological urine flow.
Drainage of the urinary tract can be accomplished by a number of techniques and
devices, including retrograde or anterograde percutaneous insertion of the double J
catheter (JJ stenting), percutaneous nephrostomy, and, more recently, the use of
ureteral prostheses. Percutaneous JJ stenting restores physiological urinary
drainage without the need for an external catheter (Figure 2). Although it has a high success rate, the techniques involved
have not been widely disseminated([7]).
Figure 1
Contrast-enhanced coronal and axial computed tomography of the abdomen
(A and B, respectively), showing marked
bilateral hydronephrosis, caused by a mass (sarcoma) in the prostate
gland, invading both ureteral orifices and making cystoscopic JJ
stenting impossible.
Figure 2
Planning of percutaneous JJ stenting with ultrasound of the urinary tract
in the hemodynamics room (A). X-ray showing adequate
positioning of both ends of the JJ stent after the procedure
(B).
Contrast-enhanced coronal and axial computed tomography of the abdomen
(A and B, respectively), showing marked
bilateral hydronephrosis, caused by a mass (sarcoma) in the prostate
gland, invading both ureteral orifices and making cystoscopic JJ
stenting impossible.Planning of percutaneous JJ stenting with ultrasound of the urinary tract
in the hemodynamics room (A). X-ray showing adequate
positioning of both ends of the JJ stent after the procedure
(B).One major advance was the development of metallic mesh stents. Such stents, including
expandable balloons, as well as self-expanding, thermoplastic, and coated stents,
have been used in the treatment of various conditions, such as benign and malignant
ureteral stenoses([8]).The advantages of interventional radiology procedures include a lower risk of
complications and the fact that they can be performed under local anesthesia and
sedation, minimizing the risks of adverse post-anesthesia events in comparison with
general anesthesia, especially in critically illpatients.
MACROSCOPIC HEMATURIA
Hematuria, which can be microscopic or macroscopic, is a common medical problem,
identified on screening tests in up to 18% of asymptomatic individuals. Various
pathological renal vascular processes have been associated with hematuria, including
aneurysm or pseudoaneurysm of the renal artery, fibromuscular dysplasia, nutcracker
syndrome, arteriovenous malformation, vasculitis, thrombosis of the renal artery or
vein, and neoplasia([9]).Embolization is a minimally invasive procedure, in which the lumen of a vessel is
occluded by embolization material, with reported success rates of up to
90%([6]).
Indications include, but are not limited to, persistent hematuria resulting from a
pseudoaneurysm (Figure 3), post-biopsy
arteriovenous fistula, renal tumors (Figure 4),
recurrence of prostate cancer (Figure 5),
vascular malformations, and surgical or accidental trauma. The materials typically
used for this purpose are collagen hemostatic sponges and vascular
coils([6]).
Figure 3
Renal angiography showing pseudoaneurysm after partial nephrectomy
(A), evolving to macroscopic hematuria. Embolization
with vascular coils (B).
Figure 4
Patient with macroscopic hematuria who had been diagnosed with renal
neoplasia that was refractory to treatment and were not candidates for
surgery. Renal angiography showing a vascularized, poorly delimited
tumor (A). The patient was treated with embolization.
Follow-up renal angiography showing regression of the findings,
indicating the success of the procedure (B).
Figure 5
Pre- and post-treatment angiography with selective embolization
(A and B, respectively), showing good
results in patients with previously resected prostate cancer, presenting
hematuria due to locoregional tumor recurrence.
Renal angiography showing pseudoaneurysm after partial nephrectomy
(A), evolving to macroscopic hematuria. Embolization
with vascular coils (B).Patient with macroscopic hematuria who had been diagnosed with renal
neoplasia that was refractory to treatment and were not candidates for
surgery. Renal angiography showing a vascularized, poorly delimited
tumor (A). The patient was treated with embolization.
Follow-up renal angiography showing regression of the findings,
indicating the success of the procedure (B).Pre- and post-treatment angiography with selective embolization
(A and B, respectively), showing good
results in patients with previously resected prostate cancer, presenting
hematuria due to locoregional tumor recurrence.Nutcracker syndrome is characterized by a set of signs and symptoms secondary to
compression of the left renal vein (Figure 6).
The compression point occurs most commonly between the superior mesenteric artery
and the aorta. Until recently, the treatment was restricted to conventional open
surgery, although it can now be performed with less invasive endovascular
methods([10]), as depicted in Figure 7.
Figure 6
Sagittal and axial computed tomography angiography (A and
B, respectively), showing compression of the left renal
vein between the aorta and the superior mesenteric artery (nutcracker
syndrome) in a patient with varicocele.
Figure 7
Angiography showing endovascular treatment with dense foam and fibered
coils (A,B) in a patient with nutcracker
syndrome.
Sagittal and axial computed tomography angiography (A and
B, respectively), showing compression of the left renal
vein between the aorta and the superior mesenteric artery (nutcracker
syndrome) in a patient with varicocele.Angiography showing endovascular treatment with dense foam and fibered
coils (A,B) in a patient with nutcracker
syndrome.
RETROPERITONEAL HEMATOMA
Spontaneous ruptures of the renal parenchyma, resulting in retroperitoneal hematoma,
are caused by tumors in 50-60% of cases. Angiomyolipoma and renal adenocarcinoma
account for two thirds of all such tumors. In addition to the rich vascularization
of these tumors, there are structural changes in the vessel walls that predispose
them to rupture. Treatment approaches include superselective arterial embolization,
tumor enucleation, and, in some cases, nephrectomy. Embolization should be
considered the initial treatment of choice in symptomatic
patients([11]).
TREATMENT OF TUMORS
Among the many options for the treatment of benign and malignant tumors affecting
multiple organs, image-guided percutaneous ablation is become increasingly more
widely accepted([4]), especially in patients who are at high surgical
risk (Figure 8). There are currently a number
of thermal and non-thermal ablation modalities available([9]), including
radiofrequency ablation, microwave ablation, cryoablation, high-intensity focused
ultrasound, laser ablation, irreversible electroporation, chemical ablation (with
ethanol or acetic acid), and brachytherapy (Figure
9).
Figure 8
In-phase gradient-echo coronal magnetic resonance imaging of the abdomen,
showing renal cell carcinoma in the right mid-kidney (A).
Follow-up magnetic resonance imaging after percutaneous ablation,
showing regression of the tumor (B).
Figure 9
Axial computed tomography of the abdomen, showing percutaneous ablation
of a renal cell carcinoma.
In-phase gradient-echo coronal magnetic resonance imaging of the abdomen,
showing renal cell carcinoma in the right mid-kidney (A).
Follow-up magnetic resonance imaging after percutaneous ablation,
showing regression of the tumor (B).Axial computed tomography of the abdomen, showing percutaneous ablation
of a renal cell carcinoma.In patients with recurrent prostate cancer, who typically present with hematuria,
selective embolization is safe and should be considered the treatment of choice,
because it usually precludes the need for emergency surgery in such critically illpatients([12]).
TREATMENT OF SECONDARY HYPERTENSION
The prevalence of secondary hypertension ranges from 3% to 5%. Among the various
causes are renovascular disease and primary hyperaldosteronism resulting from a
unilateral aldosterone-producing adenoma (Figure
10).
Figure 10
Primary hyperaldosteronism in a patient diagnosed with functional adrenal
adenoma in a single adrenal gland (arrow), visualized on
contrast-enhanced fat-saturated T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging
of the abdomen (A). Percutaneous ablation, performed as an
alternative to laparoscopic treatment, provided improvement in the
clinical and imaging parameters. Follow-up magnetic resonance imaging
showing the success of the procedure (B).
Primary hyperaldosteronism in a patient diagnosed with functional adrenal
adenoma in a single adrenal gland (arrow), visualized on
contrast-enhanced fat-saturated T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging
of the abdomen (A). Percutaneous ablation, performed as an
alternative to laparoscopic treatment, provided improvement in the
clinical and imaging parameters. Follow-up magnetic resonance imaging
showing the success of the procedure (B).Renal artery stenosis is found in 2% of the general population and in 40% of the
population at high risk for cardiovascular disease. For hemodynamically significant
stenosis, characterized by a trans-stenotic pressure gradient ≥ 20 mmHg, the
preferred treatment is recanalization, which involves balloon angioplasty, with or
without stenting. The technical success of renal angioplasty depends on the nature
of the stenosis and the underlying causal factor, ranging from 40% in stenosis
caused by arteriosclerosis to 90% in that caused by fibromuscular dysplasia. The
success rate for angioplasty is higher with stenting than
without([6]).The estimated prevalence of aldosterone-producing adenoma in hypertensivepatients
with incidentalomas is 1.6-5.0%. In young patients with hypertension, the clinical
suspicion of aldosterone-producing adenoma is increased in the presence of
refractory hypertension, hypokalemia, or a positive family history. Although the
conventional treatment for functional adrenal adenomas is surgical resection,
percutaneous ablation has been shown to be a good option for laparoscopic
treatment([13],[14]), as shown in Figure
11.
Figure 11
Axial computed tomography of the abdomen, showing percutaneous ablation
of an adrenal adenoma.
Axial computed tomography of the abdomen, showing percutaneous ablation
of an adrenal adenoma.
VASCULAR EMBOLIZATION
In patients complaining of low back pain and infertility who present with varicocele,
vascular embolization has been shown to be an excellent treatment modality. The
approach is either jugular or femoral. After diagnostic angiography, the veins are
embolized. The clinical results of technically successful percutaneous internal
sperm embolization are similar to those of surgical treatment([1]).Priapism can be the result of a variety of factors and is often treatable. During the
initial evaluation, it is essential to differentiate the causes of high and low
flow, given that the pathophysiology and treatment are different. Selective
embolization of an arteriocavernosal fistula with absorbable or nonabsorbable
materials is effective, producing better results, as well as having a lower rate of
complications, than does surgical ligation([15]).
CONCLUSION
Image-guided interventional radiology procedures are now part of contemporary urology
practice. They are minimally invasive treatment strategies with low morbidity rates.
The expectation is for even greater expansion, with new applications and imaging
techniques. It is important that non-interventional radiologists and urologists
become familiar with the variety of interventional radiology procedures that can be
performed, so that an ever greater number of patients can benefit.
Authors: Gianpaolo Carrafiello; Andrea Coppola; Giuseppe De Marchi; Federico Fontana; Filippo Piacentino; Mario Petrillo; Alessandro Taborelli; Salvatore Alessio Angileri; Genti Xhepa; Nicola Macchione; Alessandro Bacuzzi; Alberto Marconi; Anna Maria Ierardi Journal: Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol Date: 2017-12-12 Impact factor: 2.740