Equine influenza is a leading cause for respiratory illness in equines. Major control measures involve vaccination which requires continuous harmonization owing to antigenic drift. The present study focused on assessing the protective efficacy of an inactivated recombinant equine influenza virus (rgEIV) vaccine candidate adjuvanted with MontanideTM Pet Gel in murine model. The rgEIV was generated using reverse genetics by incorporating HA and NA segments from EIV/H3N8, clade 2-Florida sublineage in an A/WSN/33 /H1N1 backbone and inactivated by formalin. The vaccine was prepared by mixing inactivated rgEIV with MontanideTM Pet Gel adjuvant followed by intranasal inoculation into BALB/c mice intranasally. The immune responses and protective efficacy of the vaccine was evaluated by measurement of antibody titer, immunoglobulin subtyping, cytokines, clinical signs and pathological lesions after immunization and challenge with wild EIV. Serology and cytokine expression pattern indicated that the vaccine activated mixed Th1- and Th2-like responses of vaccine. Booster immunization stimulated strong antibody responses (HAI titre: 192 ± 28.6) at 42 days post immunization and the predominant antibody subtype was IgG1. Upregulation of interferon (IFN)-gamma, interleukin (IL)-12 and IL-2 levels indicates effective induction of Th1 type response. We found that vaccination has protected mice against equine influenza virus challenge as adjudged through a lack of nonappearance of visible clinical signs of disease, no loss of body weight loss, reduced pathology in the lungs and markedly reduced virus shedding from the respiratory tract. Therefore, we conclude that recombinant EIV vaccine candidate adjuvanted with MontanideTM Pet Gel could aid in quick harmonization of the vaccines through replacement of HA and NA genes for control of EIV outbreaks.
Equineinfluenza is a leading cause for respiratory illness in equines. Major control measures involve vaccination which requires continuous harmonization owing to antigenic drift. The present study focused on assessing the protective efficacy of an inactivated recombinant equineinfluenza virus (rgEIV) vaccine candidate adjuvanted with MontanideTM Pet Gel in murine model. The rgEIV was generated using reverse genetics by incorporating HA and NA segments from EIV/H3N8, clade 2-Florida sublineage in an A/WSN/33 /H1N1 backbone and inactivated by formalin. The vaccine was prepared by mixing inactivated rgEIV with MontanideTM Pet Gel adjuvant followed by intranasal inoculation into BALB/c mice intranasally. The immune responses and protective efficacy of the vaccine was evaluated by measurement of antibody titer, immunoglobulin subtyping, cytokines, clinical signs and pathological lesions after immunization and challenge with wild EIV. Serology and cytokine expression pattern indicated that the vaccine activated mixed Th1- and Th2-like responses of vaccine. Booster immunization stimulated strong antibody responses (HAI titre: 192 ± 28.6) at 42 days post immunization and the predominant antibody subtype was IgG1. Upregulation of interferon (IFN)-gamma, interleukin (IL)-12 and IL-2 levels indicates effective induction of Th1 type response. We found that vaccination has protected mice against equineinfluenza virus challenge as adjudged through a lack of nonappearance of visible clinical signs of disease, no loss of body weight loss, reduced pathology in the lungs and markedly reduced virus shedding from the respiratory tract. Therefore, we conclude that recombinant EIV vaccine candidate adjuvanted with MontanideTM Pet Gel could aid in quick harmonization of the vaccines through replacement of HA and NA genes for control of EIV outbreaks.
Entities:
Keywords:
MontanideTM pet gel; adjuvant; equine influenza; reverse genetics; vaccine
Equineinfluenza virus (EIV), a member of the family Orthomyxoviridae
belonging to Influenza A virus genera, is one of the most important respiratory pathogens in
horses, which causes huge economic losses in the equine industry worldwide. EIV is endemic in
the U.S.A. and Europe and outbreaks also frequently occur in other parts of the world [31]. Similar to other influenza A viruses, EIV has 8 single
stranded negative-sense RNA segments and has diverged into two main strains-H7N7 and H3N8;
however, the former strain has not been isolated since the 1980’s [32]. Recently, H3N8 strain has been found circulating globally and has
evolved into various lineages and sub-lineages. Sub-lineage Florida Clade 1 predominates in
United States, while the Florida Clade 2 EIVs have been mainly isolated from Europe and Asia
[14]. Like other influenza viruses, the containment
measures for EIV infection are centered around controlling the movement of animals and
effective vaccination strategies. The inactivated subunit and whole virus vaccines are
currently being used for influenza control [19]. To
ensure optimum protection efficacy, the vaccine must be frequently harmonized with the
currently circulating strain(s) frequently as per the recommendation of the World Organization
for Animal Health (OIE) owing to continuous viral antigenic drift [9]. In this context, plasmid-based reverse genetics technology has been
exploited for the production of recombinant vaccines through replacement of HA and NA genes
corresponding with circulating viruses in the established plasmid backbone [13, 17] (e.g.
A/WSN/33 (H1N1)) [3]. This method aids quick vaccine
harmonization and has the advantage of fast multiplication of recombinant virus in cell
culture/embryonated eggs [17] which saves time and
resources. Additionally, adjuvants play a major role in activating immune responses. Switching
from conventional adjuvants such as alum to novel adjuvants can aid in long lasting cell
mediated immunity (CMI) [22] as well as humoral immune
response [4, 7].
The MontanideTM Pet Gel (MPG) (SEPPIC, Paris, France) is a highly stable
microspherical polymer [7] which provides depot effect
to the antigen and has been used in many vaccine formulations, including vaccines against
influenza viruses [6]. Furthermore, MPG adjuvant also
has a good safety profile in companion animals including horses [4].In our study, the rgEIV (H3N8) seed strain was generated earlier through reverse genetic
engineering [16] (having HA and NA genes of
A/equine/Katra-Jammu/06/08 (H3N8) with the backbone of internal genes from
A/WSN/33 (H1N1)) and utilized after formalin inactivation and adjuvanting
with MPG. The immunogenicity and protective efficacy of rgEIV as a vaccine candidate was
evaluated in BALB/c mice which were challenged with wild virus belonging to same clade as the
HA and NA of the recombinant virus. This is the first study to report of a comprehensive study
of novel MontanideTM Pet Gel adjuvanted inactivated recombinant EIV vaccine.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Bio-safety and ethics statements
All animal studies were approved by the Institute Animal Ethical Committee (IAEC) (vide
approval no. NRCE/CPCSEA/2017-18, dated: 18.09.2017) and the Institute Bio-safety
Committee (vide approval no. NRCE/IBSC/2014/252, dated: 22.09.16) of the ICAR-National
Research Center on Equines (NRCE), India. The guidelines as defined by the Committee for
the Purpose of Control and Supervision of Experiments on Animals (CPCSEA), Ministry of
Environment and Forestry, Government of India were strictly followed for the entire
duration of the experiments. The challenge experiments with wild EIV were carried out
after housing the mice in micro-ventilator cages in a Bio-safety level-III (BSL-III)
facility at the ICAR- NRCE, Hisar, India. Furthermore, the necessary approval from the
IAEC was obtained for non-exercising specific procedures to alleviate pain/suffering
following EIV challenge in BALB/c mice. For the challenge study, EIV was administered
intranasally in mice after intra-peritoneal injection of anesthesia with Xylazine and
Ketamine mixture 100 mg/kg (Xylazine and Ketamine). Prior to experiment, mice were
acclimatized and were provided feed and water (ad libitum) for the
complete period of the study. The bio-hazard materials were safely disposed through the
services of a private partner (Synergy Waste Management Pvt Ltd., Hisar, India).
Mice
Four to five-week-old female BALB/c mice (n=162) were procured from the National
Institute of Nutrition (Hyderabad) and maintained in micro-ventilator cages in the BSL-III
animal facility of the ICAR-NRCE (Hisar, India). Mice were acclimatized and randomly
divided into three groups (A, B and C) each with 54 mice.
Viruses
The wild equineinfluenza virus (A/equine/Katra-Jammu/06/08 (H3N8)),
belonging to clade 2 of Florida sublineage, isolated from the 2008–2009 outbreak [31] from horses was propagated in 10-day-old
embryonated chicken eggs. The wild EIV was quantified by calculating the 50% egg infective
dose (EID50) using the Reed and Munch method [23] which was then used for challenge studies in mice. The rgEIV previously
constructed [16] using reverse genetics was used
for preparation of our vaccine. The rgEIV was rescued using a 6:2 reverse-genetics system
by transfection of co-cultured 293T/MDCK cells with plasmids of HA and NA genes of
A/equine/Katra-Jammu/06/08 (H3N8) cloned into a pHW2000 vector and
other six internal genes of A/WSN/33 (H1N1) cloned in pHW2000 vector (gifted by St. Jude
Children’s Research Hospital, U.S.A.) as described previously [13]. Subsequently, the rgEIV was propagated in 10-day-old embryonated
eggs by inoculating seed virus via the allantoic route and incubating for 72 hr at
35–36°C.
Vaccine formulation
The rgEIV was purified using the sucrose gradient centrifugation method with layers of
60, 30, and 15% sucrose solution. The virus pellet was collected from the interface of 30
and 60% sucrose and dissolved in phosphate buffered saline (PBS). The protein in the virus
pellet contain was quantified using the Bradford Protein Assay kit (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA,
U.S.A.) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The diluted rgEIV was inactivated
with 0.2% (v/v) formalin for three days at 4°C. The inactivation of the virus was verified
by inoculation of inactivated rgEIV preparation in 9–11-day-old embryonated eggs followed
by HA assay of the allantoic fluid. Subsequently, the inactivated ultra-purified rgEIV was
blended with MPG (gifted by SEPPIC, Paris, France), synthesized by stable dispersion of
microspherical particles of sodium polyacrylate in water. The adjuvant was mixed with the
antigen (as per manufacturer’s instructions) at a ratio of 10:90 (w:w) and placed on a
magnetic stirrer at 10°C until consistent the solution was homogenous.
Immunization and challenge
Prior to vaccination, mice were confirmed as sero-negative by haemagglutination
inhibition (HAI) assay. Mice belonging to group A were immunized with the inactivated
rgEIV vaccine candidate. Group B were mock vaccinated with PBS and served as the EIV
infected unvaccinated control. Group C animals were not given any treatment and served as
unimmunized -uninfected control (Table
1). The vaccine dosage −15 µg of viral protein in 200
µl which had been previously standardized for mice on the basis of
single radial immunodiffusion (SRD) content, total protein content of virus was utilized
in the current study [20, 21]. Group A mice were immunized with the vaccine formulation −15
µg of viral protein in 200 µl intramuscularly on both
the flanks on day 0 of the animal experimentation followed by booster doses −15
µg of viral protein on day 21 and 35 post immunization. On day 42 post
immunization, groups A and B were challenged with the wild virus
(A/equine/Katra-Jammu/06/08 (H3N8)) at 5 × 107.24
EID50 in 30 µl, intranasally. Group C mice served as mock
control and were given sterile PBS intranasally on day 42. The mice were observed daily
for clinical signs and body weight gain/loss post challenge. Mice (n=6) from each group
were euthanized on days 1, 3, 5, 9, 14 and 28 post challenge and the gross pathological
changes were observed and scored in situ (where grades 1–3 were given
based on area of consolidation, 1 grade for congestion and 1 grade for grey discoloration
of the lung). The organs (nasal turbinates, trachea, lungs and spleen) were collected for
histopathology (in 10% neutral buffered formalin), virus titration, viral RNA copy number
quantification and cytokine estimation studies (tissues were stored in RNAlater, Qiagen,
Valencia, CA, U.S.A.). Nasal washings were collected using chilled sterile Hank’s balanced
salt solution (HBSS) for virus titration and quantification studies.
Table 1.
Experimental design, immunization and challenge schedule
Groups
Experimental design
Immunization schedule
Mice sacrifice schedule (6 mice per group at each
interval)
√, vaccinated; X, not vaccinated; #, challenged with wild equine influenza virus
(EIV); *, sacrifice of mice.
√, vaccinated; X, not vaccinated; #, challenged with wild equineinfluenza virus
(EIV); *, sacrifice of mice.
Haemagglutination inhibition assay
Sera was collected from each mouse before and after immunization and challenge (i.e. days
0, 21, 35, 42, 43, 45, 47, 51, 56 and 70 post immunization). Blood samples were collected
from retro orbital plexus after applying intraperitoneal anesthesia to each mouse using
xylazine (10 mg) and ketamine (50 mg) at 100 kg/bwt. The collected sera were pooled for
each group in individual interval and an HAI test was carried out following international
protocols [18]. The non-specific haemagglutinins
from test sera were removed by treatment with 0.016 M potassium periodate and excess
periodate in the serum was neutralized by 3% glycerol. The pre-treated and heat
inactivated (56°C for 30 min) serum was used for HAI assays using 4 HA units of ether
treated EIV (A/equine/Katra-Jammu/06/08 (H3N8)).
Serum antibody isotyping
The various antibody subtypes viz., IgG1, IgG2a, IgG2b, IgG3, IgM and
IgA against EIV were estimated by indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) using
mouse monoclonal antibody isotyping reagents –ISO2 (Sigma Aldrich). Briefly, the ELISA
plates -Nunc MaxiSorp (Thermo Fisher Scientific, MA, U.S.A.) were coated overnight with
H3N8 EIV- A/equine/Katra-Jammu/06/08 at 4°C and then blocked with 7.5%
skim milk. The test sera were diluted and added to wells in duplicate (two-fold dilution
from 1:500 onwards) and incubated at 37°C for 1 hr. The wells were washed with PBS
supplemented with 0.05% Tween-20. Isotype-specific reagents (1:1,000 dilution in PBS) were
added followed by incubation at 37°C for 1 hr. Subsequently, the rabbit anti-goat IgG
(1:30,000) labeled with peroxidase was added to all wells and detected by 3,3′, 5,5′
tetramethylbenzidine substrate. The plates were read for absorbance at 450 nm in an ELISA
plate reader. The isotype titer was expressed as log10 value of highest
dilution of serum at which the absorbance was equal or greater than twice the baseline
value of the negative control.
Quantification of mRNA expression of cytokines genes by qRT-PCR
The total RNA was purified from homogenates of 25 mg tissue samples (spleen and lungs)
stored in RNAlater solution (Qiagen) using the RNAeasy mini kit (Qiagen) following
manufacturer’s instructions. The purified RNA was reverse transcribed to synthesize
complementary DNA (cDNA) using the High Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcriptase Kit (# Cat
no.4368814, Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, U.S.A.) using random primer as per the
manufacturer’s instruction. The reaction mixture (25 µl) was prepared
with 1 µg RNA, 10× RT buffer, 0.8 µl 25× dNTP (100 mM),
2.0 µl 10× random primer, 0.5 µl RNase Inhibitor and 1.0
µl MultiScribe Reverse Transcriptase (50 U/µl). The
cytokine gene(s) expressions were measured using TaqMan Cytokine Gene Expression kits
(interferon (IFN)-gamma: Mm01168134_m1; interleukin
(IL)-2: Mm00434256_m1; IL-12 alpha:
Mm00434169_m1; IL-12 beta: Mm01288989_m1; IL-4:
Mm00445259_m1; IL-6: Mm00446190_m1; IL-10:
Mm01288386_m1; tumor necrosis factor (TNF) alpha:
Mm00443258_m1 and GAPDH: 99999915_g1; Applied Biosystems) in a real-time
PCR system (StepOne, Applied Biosystems) using comparative Ct method and Sequence
Detection software v.1.2.2 (Applied Biosystems). The housekeeping glyceraldehyde
3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) gene was included for normalization of the expression of
cytokine genes. The mRNA expression level was determined as a fold increase given by the
formula: Fold change=2-ΔΔCT where, ΔCT is the difference in threshold cycles
for the target and the endogenous control and ΔΔCt=((Ct of target gene in treatment
sample)−(Ct of GAPDH in treatment sample))−((Ct of target gene in control sample)−(Ct of
GAPDH in control sample)). The −ΔΔCT is the difference between ΔCt values for
immunized/challenged and control group. The IFN gamma
(IFN-G) mRNA expression was estimated before vaccination [21,
35 and 42 days post immunization (dpi)] and after challenge [3, 5, 9 and 14 days post
challenge (dpc)]. Other cytokines viz., IL-2, IL-12 alpha, IL-12
beta, IL-4, IL-6, IL-10 and TNF alpha mRNA expressions were
estimated on 42 dpi and after challenge (3, 5, 9 and 14 dpc). The expression of cytokine
genes is represented as the mean fold change.
Histopathological studies
Following fixation of tissues with 10% phosphate buffer formalin for 72 hr at room
temperature, the tissues were processed by conventional methods for dehydration with
ascending grades of alcohol followed by subsequent clearing with benzene, embedding in
paraffin and sectioning (3–4 µm) thickness with a microtome. The sections
were stained by hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining and examined under a microscope
(Nikon model-80i). Grading of scores was done for 6 parameters: 1. Cellular infiltration,
2. Interstitial lesions, 3. Perivascular and peribronchial infiltration, 4. Necrotic
changes, 5. Bronchial lesions and 6. Total histopathological score. Grades of 0 to 5 were
given for each of the parameters with 0 indicating no pathological change while 5
indicating severe histopathological changes as described in our previous studies [20, 21].
Virus titration studies
The lung tissues and nasal washings were clarified in sterile PBS, freeze-thawed once
after which each sample was serially diluted ten-fold in PBS. Subsequently, 100
µl of each dilution was inoculated into the allantoic cavity of
10-day-old embryonated eggs in triplicates. The embryonated chicken eggs were incubated
for 72 hr at 37°C after which an HA assay was performed on the harvested allantoic fluid
and virus titers were calculated using the Reed and Muench method [23]. The titers were finally expressed as log10
EID50/ml.
Virus quantification studies by TaqMan qRT-PCR
The EIV RNA was isolated from stock virus, lung homogenate and tracheal washing of
various groups of mice at various time points (1, 3, 5, 9, 14 and 28 dpi) using the
QIAamp® Viral RNA Mini kit (Qiagen) as per the manufacturer’s instructions.
The quality and quantity of the purified RNA was determined by Nanodrop and stored at
−80°C for further analysis by qRT-PCR. The qRT-PCR assay was carried out using primers
targeting nucleoprotein (NP) gene, TaqMan probe, standards and TaqMan Fast Virus 1-Step
Master Mix (Applied Biosystems) for quantification of virus copy numbers [20].
Statistical analysis
All the data were graphed and statistically analyzed using GraphPad PRISM. A two-way
analysis of variance (ANOVA) by Bonferroni post-hoc test was used to
compare mean values by row. Any value of P<0.05 was considered to be
statistically significant.
RESULTS
Clinical signs and body weight analysis
Subsequent to challenge with wild virus, only group B mice showed marked changes in
behavior and clinical signs of disease viz. ruffled coat appearance,
inappetence, reduced self-grooming, isolation of mice in corners in a crouching position,
malaise, lethargy and dyspnoea. The clinical signs were observed between 3 to 9 dpc at
decreasing intensity. Group A and C mice appeared to be normal. None of the mice from any
of the groups died. The body weight loss was positively correlated with clinical signs as
group B showed loss in body weight upto 8 dpc, with maximum body weight loss observed at 6
dpc (−4.89% ± 0.45) (Fig. 1). Groups A and C did not show any loss in body weight and had almost similar trends
in increasing body weight (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1.
Mean percent changes in body weight challenged with equine influenza virus
(EIV).
Mean percent changes in body weight challenged with equineinfluenza virus
(EIV).
Humoral immune response induced by vaccine
An HAI assay determined that all the mice were seronegative to EIV prior to immunization.
At 21 dp), group A mice showed marked sero-conversion (34.67 ± 6.42). The titers observed
after the 1st and 2nd booster (35 dpi and 42 dpi, respectively) were 69.33 ± 12.84 and 192
± 28.62, respectively (Fig. 2A). Group B and C mice remained seronegative during this period. After challenge with
wild EIV, there was a marked increase in the HAI titres of group A mice as compared to
group B mice. At 3 dpc, group A mice had significantly higher (P<0.01)
titers of 426.67 ± 188.89, when compared to the negligible titers in group B (1.33 ± 1.33)
and higher titers (P<0.01) were maintained until the end of the
experiment in group A (Fig. 2A). Group C mice
continued to be seronegative for the entire duration of the experiment.
Fig. 2.
Immune response generated by vaccine. A: Humoral immune response by
haemagglutination inhibition (HAI) assay for pre and post challenged mice. B: Serum
antibody subclass response in group A mice.
Immune response generated by vaccine. A: Humoral immune response by
haemagglutination inhibition (HAI) assay for pre and post challenged mice. B: Serum
antibody subclass response in group A mice.
Antibody sub-classes generated in response to immunization and challenge
The immune response was characterized by evaluation of subclass switching of
immunoglobulins by isotyping ELISA. The primary immunization stimulated production of
various antibody sub-classes including IgG1, IgG2a, IgG2b, IgG3, IgM and IgA in the serum.
The mean antibody titers observed at 42 dpi (96,000 ± 32,000; 16,000 ± 0; 8,000 ± 0;
12,000 ± 400; 16,000 ± 0 and 1,500 ± 500, respectively for IgG1, IgG2a, IgG2b, IgG3, IgM
and IgA) are shown in Fig. 2B. The significantly
higher (P>0.05) titers of all antibody subclasses were observed in
immunized mice (group A) following challenge with wild H3N8 EIV at 3 dpc onwards and
recorded peak levels (titers–512,000± 0; 96,000 ± 32,000; 64,000 ± 0; 32,000 ± 0; 128,000±
0 and 8,000 ± 0 for IgG1, IgG2a, IgG2b, IgG3, IgM and IgA, respectively) at 14 dpc.
Cytokine responses to vaccine
The expressions of mRNA transcripts of various cytokines were evaluated upon immunization
followed by challenge with wild EIV (Fig. 3). The booster immunization with MPG adjuvanted vaccine (group A mice) stimulated
higher mRNA expression (P<0.001) of IFN-G (~434
fold), IL-4 (~7 fold), IL-12 alpha (~4 fold),
IL-12 beta (~4 fold), IL-6 (~2 fold),
IL-10 (~2 fold) and TNF alpha (1 fold) in spleen at 42
dpi (Fig. 3A and 3C). In the lungs, increased
expression levels of IL-6 (~15 folds), TNF alpha (~3
folds), IL-4 (2 folds) and IL-10 (~1 fold) were observed
in group A mice upon immunization (Fig. 3B). The
expression pattern of cytokines changed following challenge with wild EIV, where a
significant (P<0.001) increased in the mRNA expression of
IL-4 (~18 fold), IL-6 (~5 fold) and
IL-10 (~5 fold), IL-2 (~2 fold) and TNF
alpha (2 fold) were found in spleen at 3 dpc (45 dpi) (Fig. 3C). However, IFN-G level (163
fold) decreased at 3 dpc in the spleen (Fig.
3A). Furthermore, we detected a significant increase in the mRNA expression of
IFN-G (455 fold), IL-4 (~25 fold) and
IL-6 (~6 fold) were observed in lungs of group A mice at 3 dpc (Fig. 3C). A varied level of expression of different
cytokines was also observed in subsequent days after challenge (Fig. 3).
Fig. 3.
Cytokine profiling through relative quantification of gene expression in the spleen
and lungs of immunized animals. A: Mean fold changes in expression of interferon
(IFN)-G in the spleen and lungs. B: Mean fold changes in expression of interleukin
(IL)-2, IL-4, IL-6, IL-10, IL-12α, IL-12β and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α in
spleen of immunized challenged mice. C: Mean fold changes in expression of IL-2,
IL-4, IL-6, IL-10, IL-12α, IL-12β and TNF-α in the lung of immunized challenged
mice. Each value represents mean ± SEM (n=5).
Cytokine profiling through relative quantification of gene expression in the spleen
and lungs of immunized animals. A: Mean fold changes in expression of interferon
(IFN)-G in the spleen and lungs. B: Mean fold changes in expression of interleukin
(IL)-2, IL-4, IL-6, IL-10, IL-12α, IL-12β and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α in
spleen of immunized challenged mice. C: Mean fold changes in expression of IL-2,
IL-4, IL-6, IL-10, IL-12α, IL-12β and TNF-α in the lung of immunized challenged
mice. Each value represents mean ± SEM (n=5).
Gross pathological changes
Characteristic gross changes were noted only in the lungs. Group B mice showed much more
marked changes compared to group A and the lesions could be described as moderate to
severe congestion at 1 dpc, and red hepatization at 3 dpc which turned into grey coloured
hepatization on 5 dpc with larger areas of consolidation (up to 6 × 5 mm) (Fig. 4). At 9 dpc, consolidation had been limited to small foci in apical and middle lobe
and by 14 dpc, the lungs were mild to moderately congested. Lungs showed nearly normal
texture and appearance by 28 dpc. In group A mice congestion seemed to be the only
characteristic change up to 5 dpc after which the lungs regained their normal texture.
Scoring of the lesions revealed that at all intervals mice from group B had the highest
score with a peak at 5 dpc (3.67 ± 0.33), and the highest significant difference in scores
on 3 dpc (P<0.001) (Fig.
4).
Fig. 4.
Mean gross lung lesion scores of group A and B at different intervals after
challenge with equine influenza virus (EIV). Each value represents mean ± SEM
(n=5).
Mean gross lung lesion scores of group A and B at different intervals after
challenge with equineinfluenza virus (EIV). Each value represents mean ± SEM
(n=5).
Histopathology
In the nasal turbinates of mice, histopathological lesions could be observed from 1 dpc
onwards, in both groups A and B, albeit less severe in group A. The lesions in group A
started with deciliation of epithelial lining with goblet cell hyperplasia and mucous
accumulation in the lumen while group B also had impaction of submucosal lumens with
necrotic debris and inflammatory cells. At 3 and 5 dpc, group B mice showed severe
degeneration and vacuolation of epithelium, with its subsequent desquamation into the
lumen and conglomeration with mucous and inflammatory cells (Fig. 5A) whereas, group A animals had mild infiltration of neutrophils at 3 dpc (Fig. 5B), and the lesions were resolved by 5 dpc. No
histopathological changes were observed in the nasal turbinate 9 dpc onwards in group B
animals as well. Lesions in the trachea showed almost the same trend with the presence of
desquamated epithelial cells along with inflammatory cells predominantly macrophages and
lymphocytes in the lumen of group B animals at 3 and 5 dpc (Fig. 6A) and squamous metaplasia of tracheal epithelium by 9 dpc. The intensity of lesions
in respect of infiltration and damage to epithelial lining was far less in group B mice
(Fig. 6B) with no appreciable changes from 9
dpc onwards.
Fig. 5.
Protection of lesions in recombinant equine influenza virus (rgEIV) immunized
BALB/c mice against equine influenza virus (EIV) challenge. A: Group A-Nasal
turbinates showing intact epithelial cells, along with deciliation and submucosal
infiltration of inflammatory cells at 3 dpc (H&E × 400). B: Group-Nasal
turbinates showing degeneration of epithelium, loss of cilia, infiltration of
inflammatory cells in submucosa with goblet cell hyperplasia and mucous accumulation
in lumen at 3 dpc (H&E × 400).
Fig. 6.
Protection conferred by recombinant equine influenza virus (rgEIV) immunization in
BALB/c mice against equine influenza virus (EIV) challenge. A: Group A-Trachea
showing mild degeneration of epithelial cells, accumulation of inflammatory cells in
lamina propria, with mucous in lumen and hyperplasia of goblet cells at 3 dpc
(H&E × 400). B: Group B-Trachea showing severe necrosis of epithelial cells
along with mucous accumulation in lumen at 3 dpc (H&E × 400).
Protection of lesions in recombinant equineinfluenza virus (rgEIV) immunized
BALB/c mice against equineinfluenza virus (EIV) challenge. A: Group A-Nasal
turbinates showing intact epithelial cells, along with deciliation and submucosal
infiltration of inflammatory cells at 3 dpc (H&E × 400). B: Group-Nasal
turbinates showing degeneration of epithelium, loss of cilia, infiltration of
inflammatory cells in submucosa with goblet cell hyperplasia and mucous accumulation
in lumen at 3 dpc (H&E × 400).Protection conferred by recombinant equineinfluenza virus (rgEIV) immunization in
BALB/c mice against equineinfluenza virus (EIV) challenge. A: Group A-Trachea
showing mild degeneration of epithelial cells, accumulation of inflammatory cells in
lamina propria, with mucous in lumen and hyperplasia of goblet cells at 3 dpc
(H&E × 400). B: Group B-Trachea showing severe necrosis of epithelial cells
along with mucous accumulation in lumen at 3 dpc (H&E × 400).Overall maximum lesions were observed in the lungs and they were also scored for
objective quantification. The lesions in the control group mice (group B) which started
with congestion of blood vessels, bronchiolar epithelium necrosis and mild neutrophilic
infiltration at 1 dpc progressed to histiocytic alveolitis along with infiltration of
mainly lymphocytes and macrophages as well as with neutrophils and necrotizing bronchitis
at 3 dpc (Fig. 7B), which further progressed to peribronchiolar and perivascular pneumonitis along
with the collapse of the alveolar space with marked thickening of alveolar septa caused
mainly by extravasation of lymphoplasmacytic infiltrations into alveolar spaces on 5 dpc
(Fig. 7D), while, proliferation of type II
pneumocytes and denuding bronchiolitis were a characteristic finding on 9 dpc. Similar
changes regarding organization of the diffused alveolar damage and squamous metaplasia of
bronchial epithelial cells were discernible at 14 dpc with continuation of proliferation
of type II pneumocytes. None of the mice showed any specific lesions at 28 dpc.
Fig. 7.
Protection conferred by recombinant equine influenza virus (rgEIV) immunization
from lung histopathology in BALB/c mice after challenge with equine influenza virus
(EIV) (H3N8). A: Lung-Group A mice on 3 dpc showed goblet cell hyperplasia along
with denudation of epithelial cells into lumen (H&E × 400). B: Lung-Group B mice
on 3 dpc showing severe necrotizing erosive bronchiolitis with heavy accumulation of
mucous admixed with inflammatory cells and thickening of alveolar septa (H&E ×
400). C: Lungs-Group A mice on 5 dpc showing mild cellular infiltrations along with
evident perivascular and peribronchial cuffing (H&E × 400). D: Group B mice on 5
dpc showing high degree of cellular infiltrations along with severe consolidation
and very much evident perivascular and peribronchial cuffing (H&E × 400).
Protection conferred by recombinant equineinfluenza virus (rgEIV) immunization
from lung histopathology in BALB/c mice after challenge with equineinfluenza virus
(EIV) (H3N8). A: Lung-Group A mice on 3 dpc showed goblet cell hyperplasia along
with denudation of epithelial cells into lumen (H&E × 400). B: Lung-Group B mice
on 3 dpc showing severe necrotizing erosive bronchiolitis with heavy accumulation of
mucous admixed with inflammatory cells and thickening of alveolar septa (H&E ×
400). C: Lungs-Group A mice on 5 dpc showing mild cellular infiltrations along with
evident perivascular and peribronchial cuffing (H&E × 400). D: Group B mice on 5
dpc showing high degree of cellular infiltrations along with severe consolidation
and very much evident perivascular and peribronchial cuffing (H&E × 400).In comparison, vaccinated animals (Group A) showed markedly fewer lesions with
generalized congestion as the only consistent finding at 1 dpc. At 3 dpc mild bronchiolar
degeneration, goblet cell hyperplasia and mild diffused infiltration of lymphocytes,
neutrophils and macrophages (Fig. 7A) was
observed. At 5 dpc the lesions included diffused mild infiltration of lymphocytes, edema
around blood vessels along with perivascular and peribronchial cuffing (Fig. 7C) which was much less intensity as compared
to group B animals. By 9 dpc the mice had nearly regained normal histology barring mild
bronchial degeneration and mild focal lymphocytic infiltration. By 14 dpc, the lung
histology was back to normal.Our findings were substantiated with histopathological scoring for all the lesions where
barring perivascular and peribronchial cuffing, for all parameters mice from the group A
had significant (P<0.05) to highly significant
(P<0.001) reduction in lesion scores compared to group B at 1, 3, 5
and 9 dpc (Fig. 8, Table 2). In terms of cellular infiltration, group B had the highest mean score of
3.17 ± 0.31 at 3 dpc compared to 1.5 ± 0.34 in group A mice (Fig. 8A, Table 2). In
terms of interstitial lesions, Group A had much lower scores than group B on 3 and 5 dpc
(P<0.01) and continued to remain significant on 9 and 14 dpc
(P<0.05) (Fig. 8B, Table 2). With respect to necrotic changes, group
B scores were very significantly higher (P<0.001) compared to group A
mice at 3 dpc (Fig. 8C, Table 2). In terms of bronchial lesions, group B mice showed the
highest overall score with a peak of 3.33 ± 0.21 at 3 dpc and mice from the vaccinated
group (A) showed significantly lower scores (P<0.001) on 3 and 5 dpc
(Fig. 8D, Table 2).
Fig. 8.
Overall histopathological scoring for all the lesions. A: Histopathological lesion
scores for cellular infiltrations in lungs. B: Histopathological lesion scores for
interstitial lesions in lungs. C: Histopathological lesion scores for necrotic
changes in lungs. D: Total histopathological lesion score in lungs
Table 2.
Histopathological lung lesion scores at different intervals in group A and B
mice after challenge with wild H3N8 equine influenza virus
Days post challenge
Cellular infiltrations
Interstitial lesions
Necrotic changes
Total histopathological lesion
Group A
Group B
Group A
Group B
Group A
Group B
Group A
Group B
1
1.17 ± 0.31c)
2.33 ± 0.21
1 ± 0.25
1.83 ± 0.31
0.17 ± 0.17b)
1.67 ± 0.42
1.33 ± 0.21c)
2.33 ± 0.21
3
1.5 ± 0.34b)
2.83 ± 0.31
1.5 ± 0.34a)
3.17 ± 0.31
0.67 ± 0.49a)
3 ± 0.26
1.5 ± 0.22a)
3.17 ± 0.17
5
1.67 ± 0.22
2.67 ± 0.22
1.33 ± 0.21b)
2.83 ± 0.17
0.67 ± 0.42
1.67 ± 0.56
1.67 ± 0.21a)
3 ± 0.26
9
1.17 ± 0.31c)
2.33 ± 0.21
1.17 ± 0.31c)
2.5 ± 0.43
0.33 ± 0.21
1.17 ± 0.54
1.17 ± 0.17
2 ± 0.26
14
0.83 ± 0.17
1.83 ± 0.40
0.17 ± 0.17c)
1.67 ± 0.49
0.17 ± 0.17
0.5 ± 0.34
0.5 ± 0.34
1.33 ± 0.42
28
0.83 ± 0.17
1 ± 0.37
0 ± 0
0.33 ± 0.21
0 ± 0
0 ± 0
0.17 ± 0.17
0.33 ± 0.21
Each value represents mean ± SEM (n=6). a) Indicates significant difference
P<0.001, b) P<0.01, c)
P<0.05, between groups in the same row in two way ANOVA,
Bonnferoni post hoc test.
Overall histopathological scoring for all the lesions. A: Histopathological lesion
scores for cellular infiltrations in lungs. B: Histopathological lesion scores for
interstitial lesions in lungs. C: Histopathological lesion scores for necrotic
changes in lungs. D: Total histopathological lesion score in lungsEach value represents mean ± SEM (n=6). a) Indicates significant difference
P<0.001, b) P<0.01, c)
P<0.05, between groups in the same row in two way ANOVA,
Bonnferoni post hoc test.
Vaccine reduced virus shedding and replication
Group B mice showed the highest virus shedding from tracheal washings as well as residual
virus load on 1 dpc with a titre of 104.78EID50/ml
in nasal washings (Fig. 9A) and 103.50EID50/25 mg from lung tissue (Fig. 9B). The virus titer was observed until 5 dpc
(101.75EID50/ml for nasal washings and
101.25 EID50/25 mg for lung tissue) with decreasing trends. No
virus shedding was detected in group A or C at any of the time points.
Fig. 9.
Equine influenza virus (EIV) titers (Log10 Mean EID50) in
nasal washing and lungs after EIV challenge. A: Residual EIV titer in nasal washings
at various intervals after challenge. B: Residual EIV titer lungs at various
intervals after challenge.
Equineinfluenza virus (EIV) titers (Log10 Mean EID50) in
nasal washing and lungs after EIV challenge. A: Residual EIV titer in nasal washings
at various intervals after challenge. B: Residual EIV titer lungs at various
intervals after challenge.The virus titration studies were validated by quantification of viral RNA copy numbers.
Mice from group B showed mean copy numbers at 1, 3 and 5 dpc in both nasal washings
11,580.6 ± 2,564.7; 9,896.5 ± 2,376.8 and 1,787.3 ± 102.2, respectively and lung tissues
14,196 ± 3,452.8; 10,452 ± 2,134.8 and 6,865 ± 765.2, respectively, which were
significantly higher (P<0.001) than group A (Table 3). Amongst group A animals, higher numbers were observed at 3 dpc (1,054.8 ±
87.8) as compared to 1 dpc (514.5 ± 43.8) in the nasal washings while the copy numbers in
the lungs followed the declining pattern from 1 dpc (5,212 ± 567.8) to 3 dpc (653 ± 156.7)
(Table 3).
Table 3.
Equine influenza virus (EIV) shedding in nasal washings/lungs of group A and
group B mice after challenge
Days post challenge
Nasal washings
Lung tissues
EIV viral RNA copy numbers
Ct values
EIV viral RNA copy numbers
Ct values
Group A
Group B
Group A
Group B
Group A
Group B
Group A
Group B
1
514.5 ± 43.8a)
11,580.6 ± 2,564.7
33.0 ± 0.94a)
23.76 ± 0.58
5,212 ± 567.8a)
14,196 ± 3,452.8
30.4 ± 0.43a)
22.5 ± 0.34
3
1,054.8 ± 87.8a)
9,896.5 ± 2,376.8
32.9 ± 1.1a)
25 ± 0.34
653 ± 156.7a)
10,452 ± 2,134.8
34.7 ± 0.98a)
25.7 ± 0.73
5
6.1 ± 0.3
1,787.3 ± 102.2
36. 43 ± 0.76a)
32 ± 1.04
–
6,865 ± 765.2
–
29 ± 0.16
9
–
7.9 ± 0.3
–
36.21 ± 1.2
–
963 ± 45.5
–
33.5 ± 0.45
14
–
3.3 ± 0.2
–
38.54 ± 0.86
–
–
–
–
28
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Each value represents mean ± SEM (n=6). Significant difference indicated as a)
P<0.001 when groups are compared with group C in the same row
using two way ANOVA, Bonferroni post hoc test. (−) indicates not
detected.
Each value represents mean ± SEM (n=6). Significant difference indicated as a)
P<0.001 when groups are compared with group C in the same row
using two way ANOVA, Bonferroni post hoc test. (−) indicates not
detected.
DISCUSSION
The use of vaccines against Influenza is always a challenge as continuous antigenic drift
and shift requires regular harmonization of virus strain. The present study aimed to
investigate the immunogenicity and protective efficacy of an inactivated recombinant EIV
(H3N8) seed strain generated by reverse genetics for quick vaccine harmonization. The
vaccine candidate was adjuvanted with MPG to improve immune responses. The HA and NA
segments in the constructed virus belonged to Clade 2 of EIV which is one of the OIE
recommended EIV strains for vaccination. The rgEIV vaccine candidate stimulated a strong
antibody response in group A mice with an HAI titers of 192 ± 28.62, at 42 dpi which is 3
times the recommended seroprotective HAI titres established by the OIE [18]. Therefore, we have shown that rgEIV with backbone of
WSN/33 (H1N1) provides adequate stimulation of immune responses indicated through HAI
antibody titers as has also been documented by Bhatia et al. [3] in chicken immunized with rgH5N2 and challenge with
HPAI (H5N1). The rgEIV vaccine candidate also induced higher antibody response as compared
to the aluminum hydroxide (Alum) adjuvanted inactivated whole EIV (H3N8) vaccine which
generated an HAI titer of 138.67 ± 22.69 in mice at 42 dpi [21]. The antibody response in infection control mice (group B) was lower with an
HAI titer of 18.67 ± 4.46 at 5 dpc which increased to 69.33 ± 12.84 at 14 dpc. Almost
similar serological response was also found in previous studies [21]. The MPG adjuvant has been shown to influence the increase in
antibody response of inactivated Rhodococcus equi vaccine in horses without
any adverse effect [7]. Recent studies investigating a
vaccine against Sporothrix schenckii observed significantly higher antibody
production in mice immunized with MPG adjuvanted cell wall protein or recombinant enolase
protein [22, 29]. Cytokine profiling showed a surge in IFN-G , IL-2,
IL-4, IL-6, IL-10 and IL-12 levels in the mice immunized with
the vaccine candidate indicating stimulation of mixed Th1 and Th2 responses. Immunoglobulin
isotyping revealed a prevalence of IgG1 and IgG2a antibodies. The murineIgG1 and IgG2a
subtypes have been shown to be major antibody subtype responsible for upregulating the
antibody response via-Fc receptors [11, 25] and protection against various viruses [1]. The stimulation of Th1-like cytokines by Montanide has
been shown to increase the production of IgG2a which is mainly associated with Th1-like
immune response [10, 15]. Moreover, IL-6 plays an important role in antibody
production by B cells through induction of IL-21 production from CD4+ T
cells [8] and in antigen-specific IgG subclass
switching [27].Increased expression of IFN-G was observed in splenocytes throughout the
immunization period which is indicative of priming of the cellular immune system. MPG has
been documented to stimulate production of IFN-G and
IL-12 in mice [22]. The
upregulation of expression of IFN-G, IL-12 and
IL-2 (only in mice post challenge) suggests the effective induction of
the Th1 type immune response, which is primarily essential for activation of macrophages,
natural killer cells and cytotoxic cells for virus clearance [24, 30]. Moreover,
IL-12 has also been shown to play an important role in the proliferation
of CD8 cells and cytolytic response against influenza [2]. The current vaccine candidate stimulated production of cytokines which lead to
cellular immune response-however aluminum hydroxide adjuvanted vaccines are unable to induce
such immune response [19]. The appropriate
stimulation of immunity was reflected through challenge studies where immunized mice (group
A) showed lower virus titers/copy number which also correlated well with protection from
loss in body weight, no clinical symptoms and less gross and histopathological changes in
target organs. This coincides with other vaccine studies that showed good protective
efficacy [5]. Group B had very high copy numbers in
the nasal washings on 1 and 3 dpc which correlated with lesions in trachea and turbinates
(deciliation, desquamation of epithelium and presence of inflammatory cells in the lumen)
that reached their maximum upto 3 dpc, while viral residual titer numbers which were
detectable upto 5 dpc in the lungs relate with lesions (necrotizing erosive bronchiolitis
and alveolitis) that were seen in maximum intensity upto 5 dpc in the lungs. Pavulraj
et al. [21] also had analogous
EID50 values in nasal washings in the unimmunized group while a very low titer
shedding of virus was observed on 1 dpc with in mice challenged with the H3N8 virus
subsequent to immunization with inactivated virus adjuvanted with alum. Svitek et
al. [26] showed reduced viral load in
nasal washes from 1 dpc onward before disappearing altogether on 6 dpc in ferrets challenged
with H1N1 and H3N2 virus. The group A mice had significantly lower virus quantity as
estimated through EIV RNA copy numbers in both lungs and nasal washings at 1 dpc in
comparison to 3 dpc with no detection of virus in titration studies which indicates higher
shedding of residual viral RNA than group B. Earlier studies on various Influenza A viruses
viz. H3N8 in BALB/c mice [20,
21], H3N2 virus in ferrets [12] and H9N2 in broiler chickens [28] had similar findings.Thus, it can be concluded from the present study that our recombinant equineinfluenza
virus vaccine candidate adjuvanted with MonatanideTM Pet Gel stimulated both Th1
and Th2 mediated immune responses and conferred good protection against equineinfluenza
virus as determined through a lack of visible clinical signs of disease, prevention of body
weight loss, reduced pathology in lungs and markedly reduced virus shedding from respiratory
tract. This can aid in quick harmonization of the vaccines through replacement of HA and NA
genes and help as an exigency measure for control of EIV outbreaks.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors declare that there is no competing conflict of interests.
Authors: Emmie de Wit; Vincent J Munster; Monique I J Spronken; Theo M Bestebroer; Chantal Baas; Walter E P Beyer; Guus F Rimmelzwaan; Albert D M E Osterhaus; Ron A M Fouchier Journal: J Virol Date: 2005-10 Impact factor: 5.103
Authors: Dirk J Lefeber; Barry Benaissa-Trouw; Johannes F G Vliegenthart; Johannis P Kamerling; Wouter T M Jansen; Kees Kraaijeveld; Harm Snippe Journal: Infect Immun Date: 2003-12 Impact factor: 3.441
Authors: Oliver Dienz; Sheri M Eaton; Jeffrey P Bond; Wendy Neveu; David Moquin; Rajkumar Noubade; Eva M Briso; Colette Charland; Warren J Leonard; Gennaro Ciliberto; Cory Teuscher; Laura Haynes; Mercedes Rincon Journal: J Exp Med Date: 2009-01-12 Impact factor: 14.307