Literature DB >> 31656011

The "MICE" scoring system in differentiating the identical twins leptospirosis and hantavirus infection.

Selçuk Kaya1, Gürdal Yılmaz2, Murat Aydın2, Firdevs Aksoy2, Iftihar Koksal2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To develop a practical scoring system to assist clinicians in differentiating leptospirosis and hantavirus infections, whose epidemiological, clinical, and laboratory characteristics are literally like identical twins.
METHODS: The study population consisted of 162 patients admitted to hospital with a confirmed diagnosis of leptospirosis (LG group, n = 92) and hantavirus infections (HG, group = 70) between January 2000 and January 2019. The two groups were compared in terms of demographic, clinical and laboratory features. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were determined from ROC analysis for findings of significance in the diagnosis of leptospirosis, and a scoring system for diagnosis was developed ("MICE" score). During the development of this scoring system, we were careful to employ parameters that would not affect one another statistically, to reflect the involvement of very different systems (such as the hematological, hepatic, renal, and musculoskeletal systems) due to the multisystemic effect of the disease in the organism, and to ensure that the system should be simple to apply and understand. Accordingly, five parameters, serum WBC, creatinine, creatine kinase, total bilirubin, and C-reactive protein, were employed in the "MICE" scoring system.
RESULTS: Three cut-off values were determined using ROC analysis for the five parameters included in the MICE system. Accordingly, scores of 0, 1, or 2 were given based on the values WBC (/μL): ≤ 7500, 7500-15,000, and > 15,000; total bilirubin (mg/dL): ≤ 3, 3-10, and > 10; CRP (mg/dL): ≤ 5, 5-15, and > 15; creatinine (mg/dL): ≤ 1.5, 1.5-3, and > 3; CK (U/L): ≤ 500, 500-1000, > 1000. AUC was calculated as 0.964 at ROC analysis, while the most noteworthy cut-off point was obtained when MICE score was ≥ 3, exhibiting 93.5% sensitivity, 92.9% specificity, PPV 94.5% and NPV 91.5%. A test score ≥ 3 was regarded as positive. In addition, our patients were evaluated using other current scoring systems in addition to "MICE," and our scoring system exhibited a greater diagnostic power in our subjects.
CONCLUSIONS: Leptospirosis and hantavirus infections can be accurately predicted by the MICE scoring system. Early diagnosis and rational treatment will also help to lower the mortality rates in these diseases.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hantavirus infection; Identical twins; Leptospirosis; MICE scoring system

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31656011     DOI: 10.1007/s15010-019-01366-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Infection        ISSN: 0300-8126            Impact factor:   3.553


  20 in total

Review 1.  Human hantavirus infections: epidemiology, clinical features, pathogenesis and immunology.

Authors:  Tobias Manigold; Pablo Vial
Journal:  Swiss Med Wkly       Date:  2014-03-20       Impact factor: 2.193

2.  Clinical and biochemical differences between hantavirus infection and leptospirosis: a retrospective analysis of a patient series in Belgium.

Authors:  Emma Bakelants; Willy Peetermans; Katrien Lagrou; Wouter Meersseman
Journal:  Acta Clin Belg       Date:  2019-03-18       Impact factor: 1.264

3.  Leptospirosis versus hantavirus infections in the Netherlands and in Belgium, 2000 to 2014.

Authors:  J Clement; M Van Esbroeck; K Lagrou; J Verschueren; N P Sunil-Chandra; M Van Ranst
Journal:  Euro Surveill       Date:  2014-09-25

Review 4.  Hantavirus infection: a global zoonotic challenge.

Authors:  Hong Jiang; Xuyang Zheng; Limei Wang; Hong Du; Pingzhong Wang; Xuefan Bai
Journal:  Virol Sin       Date:  2017-01-23       Impact factor: 4.327

5.  [Hantavirus infection: two case reports from a province in the Eastern Black Sea Region, Turkey].

Authors:  Selçuk Kaya; Gürdal Yılmaz; Sükrü Erensoy; Dilek Yağçı Çağlayık; Yavuz Uyar; Iftihar Köksal
Journal:  Mikrobiyol Bul       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 0.622

6.  An outbreak of leptospirosis among reserve military recruits, Hulu Perdik, Malaysia.

Authors:  Vasantha Kumari Neela; Nurul Natasya Azhari; Narcisse Joseph; Noraini Philip Mimie; Siti Nur Alia Ramli; Nooreen Farzana Mustapha; Siti Nabilah Ishak; Farah Shafawati Mohd-Taib; Muhammad Afif Yusof; Mohd Nasir Mohd Desa; Garba Bashiru; Zamberi Sekawi
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2019-01-24       Impact factor: 3.267

Review 7.  Hemorrhagic Fever with Renal Syndrome: Pathogenesis and Clinical Picture.

Authors:  Hong Jiang; Hong Du; Li M Wang; Ping Z Wang; Xue F Bai
Journal:  Front Cell Infect Microbiol       Date:  2016-02-03       Impact factor: 5.293

8.  Utility of modified Faine's criteria in diagnosis of leptospirosis.

Authors:  Kanchana Bandara; Manjula Manoji Weerasekera; Chinthika Gunasekara; Nilantha Ranasinghe; Chamil Marasinghe; Neluka Fernando
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2016-08-24       Impact factor: 3.090

9.  Thai-Lepto-on-admission probability (THAI-LEPTO) score as an early tool for initial diagnosis of leptospirosis: Result from Thai-Lepto AKI study group.

Authors:  Theerapon Sukmark; Nuttha Lumlertgul; Sadudee Peerapornratana; Kamol Khositrangsikun; Kriang Tungsanga; Visith Sitprija; Nattachai Srisawat
Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis       Date:  2018-03-19

10.  Clinical and Epidemiological Status of Leptospirosis in a Tropical Caribbean Area of Colombia.

Authors:  Vaneza Tique; Salim Mattar; Jorge Miranda; Misael Oviedo; Angel Noda; Eney Montes; Virginia Rodriguez
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-05-29       Impact factor: 3.411

View more
  2 in total

1.  Pericarditis as a cardiac manifestation of acute leptospirosis.

Authors:  M Zechel; M Franz; M Baier; S Hagel; B T Schleenvoigt
Journal:  Infection       Date:  2020-08-10       Impact factor: 3.553

2.  An evaluation of suspected cases of Hantavirus infection admitted to a tertiary care university hospital in Düzce, Turkey, between 2012 and 2018

Authors:  Nevin İnce; Kürşad Öne; Tansu Sav; Mehmet Ali Sungur; Dilek Menemenlioğlu
Journal:  Turk J Med Sci       Date:  2021-02-26       Impact factor: 0.973

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.