Ferdous Madadi1,2, Rami Jawad3, Ismail Mousati3, Philip Plaeke4, Guy Hubens5,6. 1. Faculty of Medicine and Health Care, University of Antwerp, Universiteitsplein 1, 2610, Antwerp, Belgium. ferdousmadadi@gmail.com. 2. Antwerp University Hospital, Wilrijkstraat 10, 2650, Edegem, Belgium. ferdousmadadi@gmail.com. 3. Faculty of Medicine and Health Care, University of Antwerp, Universiteitsplein 1, 2610, Antwerp, Belgium. 4. Laboratory of Experimental Medicine and Pediatrics (LEMP), University of Antwerp, Universiteitsplein 1, 2610, Antwerp, Belgium. 5. Department of Abdominal Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital, Wilrijkstraat 10, 2650, Edegem, Belgium. 6. Antwerp Surgical Training, Anatomy and Research Centre (ASTARC), University of Antwerp, Universiteitsplein 1, 2610, Antwerp, Belgium.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The sleeve gastrectomy (SG) has gained popularity which has resulted in a rising number of patients with T2DM to undergo this procedure. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare the long-term effects of SG on T2DM remission with remission seen after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) or gastric banding (GB). METHODS: A literature search was performed in PubMed and Cochrane Library using the following search terms: 'sleeve gastrectomy', 'diabetes', 'gastric bypass' and 'gastric banding'. Studies published between January 2000 and April 2018, and with following inclusion criteria were selected for this review: BMI ≥ 35 kg/m2, age ≥ 18 years, follow-up ≥ 1 year, T2DM. Data was statistically analysed using a random-effects model and results were expressed as odds ratio with 95% confidence interval. RESULTS: After exclusion, 35 out of an initial 748 studies, consisting of 18 138 T2DM patients, remained for inclusion. Of these patients, 2480 underwent a SG. The remaining patients underwent a RYGB (n = 10,597) or GB (n = 5061). One year postoperatively, SG patients reached significantly (OR 0.71, p = 0.003) less T2DM remission than RYGB. After stratifying for different criteria for remission, RYGB still tended to result in higher remission rates, but the difference was not statistically significant. Beyond 1 year of follow-up, the difference between RYGB and SG in terms of T2DM remission decreased. SG was superior to the GB (OR 2.17, p = 0.001) after 1 year of follow-up. CONCLUSION: This review demonstrates important remission of T2DM following SG. Nevertheless, as remission was significantly more often observed following RYGB surgery, the latter procedure remains the gold standard for reaching T2DM remission in patients with concurrent obesity.
BACKGROUND: The sleeve gastrectomy (SG) has gained popularity which has resulted in a rising number of patients with T2DM to undergo this procedure. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare the long-term effects of SG on T2DM remission with remission seen after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) or gastric banding (GB). METHODS: A literature search was performed in PubMed and Cochrane Library using the following search terms: 'sleeve gastrectomy', 'diabetes', 'gastric bypass' and 'gastric banding'. Studies published between January 2000 and April 2018, and with following inclusion criteria were selected for this review: BMI ≥ 35 kg/m2, age ≥ 18 years, follow-up ≥ 1 year, T2DM. Data was statistically analysed using a random-effects model and results were expressed as odds ratio with 95% confidence interval. RESULTS: After exclusion, 35 out of an initial 748 studies, consisting of 18 138 T2DM patients, remained for inclusion. Of these patients, 2480 underwent a SG. The remaining patients underwent a RYGB (n = 10,597) or GB (n = 5061). One year postoperatively, SG patients reached significantly (OR 0.71, p = 0.003) less T2DM remission than RYGB. After stratifying for different criteria for remission, RYGB still tended to result in higher remission rates, but the difference was not statistically significant. Beyond 1 year of follow-up, the difference between RYGB and SG in terms of T2DM remission decreased. SG was superior to the GB (OR 2.17, p = 0.001) after 1 year of follow-up. CONCLUSION: This review demonstrates important remission of T2DM following SG. Nevertheless, as remission was significantly more often observed following RYGB surgery, the latter procedure remains the gold standard for reaching T2DM remission in patients with concurrent obesity.
Authors: Raul J Rosenthal; Alberto Aceves Diaz; Dag Arvidsson; Randal S Baker; Nicola Basso; Drake Bellanger; Camilo Boza; Haicam El Mourad; Michael France; Michel Gagner; Manoel Galvao-Neto; Kelvin D Higa; Jacques Himpens; Colleen M Hutchinson; Moises Jacobs; John O Jorgensen; Gregg Jossart; Muffazal Lakdawala; Ninh T Nguyen; David Nocca; Gerhard Prager; Alfons Pomp; Almino Cardoso Ramos; Raul J Rosenthal; Shashank Shah; Michel Vix; Alan Wittgrove; Natan Zundel Journal: Surg Obes Relat Dis Date: 2011-11-10 Impact factor: 4.734
Authors: Lars Sjöström; Markku Peltonen; Peter Jacobson; Sofie Ahlin; Johanna Andersson-Assarsson; Åsa Anveden; Claude Bouchard; Björn Carlsson; Kristjan Karason; Hans Lönroth; Ingmar Näslund; Elisabeth Sjöström; Magdalena Taube; Hans Wedel; Per-Arne Svensson; Kajsa Sjöholm; Lena M S Carlsson Journal: JAMA Date: 2014-06-11 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: David Benaiges; Juana A Flores Le-Roux; Juan Pedro-Botet; Juan J Chillarón; Marine Renard; Alejandra Parri; José M Ramón; Manuel Pera; Alberto Goday Journal: Int J Surg Date: 2013-02-24 Impact factor: 6.071
Authors: Ralph Peterli; Robert E Steinert; Bettina Woelnerhanssen; Thomas Peters; Caroline Christoffel-Courtin; Markus Gass; Beatrice Kern; Markus von Fluee; Christoph Beglinger Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2012-05 Impact factor: 4.129
Authors: Magdalena Mizera; Michał Wysocki; Katarzyna Bartosiak; Paula Franczak; Hady Razak Hady; Piotr Kalinowski; Piotr Myśliwiec; Michał Orłowski; Rafał Paluszkiewicz; Jerzy Piecuch; Jacek Szeliga; Maciej Walędziak; Piotr Major; Michał Pędziwiatr Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2020-11-05 Impact factor: 4.129